Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:43:54.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control with Fluazifop and Residues in Cucurbit Crops (Cucumis sp.) and Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea batatas)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Nancy Y. Parker ,
Thomas J. Monaco ,
Ross B. Leidy  and
Thomas J. Sheets
Nancy Y. Parker
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7509
Thomas J. Monaco
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7509
Ross B. Leidy
Affiliation:
Pestic. Residue Res. Lab., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7509
Thomas J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Pestic. Residue Res. Lab., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695–7509
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid} controlled annual grasses in cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L. ‘Calypso’ and ‘Poinsett’), cantaloupe (Cucumis melo L. ‘Edisto 47’), zucchini squash (Cucurbita pepo L. ‘Elite’), and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L. ‘Jewel’) when applied as single or repeated applications of 0.3 or 0.6 kg ai/ha during 1982 and 1983 in North Carolina. All crops were generally tolerant to fluazifop and yields were equal to cultivated controls in all but one experiment. Residues detected in the various crops by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) decreased as time elapsed between application and harvest increased. Approximately 1 ppm (w/w) of fluazifop was detected in cucumbers at 8 days after application, but residues were below the least detectable limit (0.05 ppm) when cucumbers, squash, and cantaloupe were harvested at 18 to 29 days after application. Fluazifop concentrations were 0.06 ppm or less in sweet potatoes at 55 days after application, and no fluazifop was detected at 84 days after application. Small cucumbers (<12 cm long) had greater fluazifop residues than larger fruit (>12 cm long) 20 days following application.

Keywords

Cucumis sativus L.C. melo L.Cucurbita pepo L.HPLC
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , May 1985 , pp. 405 - 410
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1975. Pesticide Analytical Manual. Vol. 1. Methods Which Detect Multiple Residues, Section 141. U.S. Dep. Health, Education, and Food and Drug Admin. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S. 1960. Evidence for hydrolysis of esters of 2,4-D during absorption by plants. Weeds 8:19–25.Google Scholar
3. Doll, J. D., Simkins, G. S., Bhomik, P. C., and Prost, D. C. 1983. Selective postemergence quackgrass (Agropyron repens L.) control in soybeans. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 19.Google Scholar
4. Driver, J. and Frans, R. 1982. Selective postemergence control of johnsongrass in soybeans and cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:27.Google Scholar
5. Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1983. Three postemergence grass selective herbicides for weed control in first year alfalfa. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 23.Google Scholar
6. Hendley, P., Dicks, J. W., Monaco, T. J., Slyfield, S. M., Tummon, O. J., and Barrett, J. C. 1985. Translocation and metabolism of pyridinyloxyphenoxy-propionate herbicides in rhizomatous quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 33: 11–24.Google Scholar
7. Jeffcoat, B. and Harris, W. N. 1973. Selectivity and mode of action of ethyl (±)-2-(N-benzoyl-3,4-dichloroanilino)-propioate in the control of Avena fatua in cereals. Pestic. Sci. 4:891–899.Google Scholar
8. Johnson, E. L. 1983. Rules and registration. Federal Register 48(82):19026.Google Scholar
9. Locascio, S. J. and Stall, W. M. 1982. Pre and postemergence weed control in cucumber and squash. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:112.Google Scholar
10. Monaco, T. J. 1982. Postemergence grass herbicides in vegetables. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:141.Google Scholar
11. Plowman, R. E., Stonebridge, W. C., and Hawtree, J. N. 1980. Fluazifop-butyl a new selective herbicide for the control of annual and perennial grass weeds. Proc. Brit. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds. Pages 29–37.Google Scholar
12. Porter, D. J. and Harvey, R. G. 1983. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) control in soybeans with postemergence herbicides. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 18.Google Scholar
13. Porter, W. C. 1982. Competition between sweet potatoes and annual weeds. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 35:110.Google Scholar
14. Velovitch, J. J. and Slife, F. W. 1983. Uptake, translocation and metabolism of fluazifop-butyl in foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) Beauv.) and common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.). Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 74.Google Scholar