Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:20:11.851Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Control in Sugarbeets with Herbicides and Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. A. Wicks  and
F. N. Anderson
G. A. Wicks
Affiliation:
North Platte Station at North Platte, University of Nebraska
F. N. Anderson
Affiliation:
Scotts Bluff Station at Mitchell, University of Nebraska
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of five herbicide and three in-the-row cultivation treatments on weed control and sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield were studied at Mitchell and North Platte, Nebraska, during 1966 and 1967. Preplant soil incorporation treatments of 5-amino-4-chloro-2-phenyl-3(2H)-pyridazinone (pyrazon) + N,N,dimethyltri-decylamine salt of 7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]heptane-2,3-dicarboxylic acid (endothall), and S-ethyl N-ethylthiocyclohexanecarbamate (cycloate), and postemergence application of pyrazon + 2,2-dichloropropionic acid (dalapon) resulted in better weed control and more sucrose per acre than S-propyl butylethylthiocarbamate (pebulate) applied preplant and soil-incorporated, and the untreated check treatment. Herbicide-treated plots kept weed-free by handweeding did not differ from the handweed check in sucrose production. Rotary hoeing improved weed control and increased sucrose yields as compared to flextine harrowing and the no in-the-row cultivation treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 456 - 459
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Comes, R. D., Bohmont, D. W., and Alley, H. P. 1961. Movement and persistence of endothall (3,6-endoxohexahydroph-thalic acid) as influenced by soil texture, temperature, and moisture levels. J. Am. Soc. Sugar Beet Technol. 11:287–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Knake, E. L., Slife, F. W., and Seif, R. D. 1965. The effect of rotary hoeing on performance of preemergence herbicides. Weeds 13:72–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Frank, R. 1967. Pyrazon, a selective herbicide for sugarbeets. Weeds 15:197–201.Google Scholar
4. Sullivan, E. F., Abrams, R. L., and Wood, R. R. 1963. Weed control in sugarbeets by combinations of thiolcarbamate herbicides. Weeds 11:258–260.Google Scholar
5. Wicks, G. A. and Anderson, F. N. 1964. Effectiveness of PEBC, DATC, and endothall for controlling weeds in sugarbeets in western Nebraska. J. Am. Soc. of Sugar Beet Technol. 13:81–95.Google Scholar
6. Wicks, G. A. and Somerhalder, B. R. 1964. Combination of pyrazon with dalapon, FW 925, and TD 273 for postemergence weed control in sugarbeets. North Centr. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 21:64.Google Scholar