Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:56:36.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Weed Communities of Snap Bean Fields in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2024

Pavle Pavlovic
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, U.S.A.
Jed B. Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
Nicholas E. Korres
Affiliation:
ORISE Established Science Fellow, USDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, Urbana, IL, U.S.A.
Rui Liu
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, U.S.A.
Carolyn J. Lowry
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Penn State University, University Park, PA, U.S.A.
Ed Peachey
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, U.S.A.
Barbara Scott
Affiliation:
Associate Scientist, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE, U.S.A.
Lynn M. Sosnoskie
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, U.S.A.
Mark J. VanGessel
Affiliation:
Professor, University of Delaware, Georgetown, DE, U.S.A.
Martin M. Williams II*
Affiliation:
Ecologist, USDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, Urbana, IL, U.S.A.
*
*Author for correspondence: Martin M. Williams II, Ecologist, USDA-ARS Global Change and Photosynthesis Research Unit, Urbana, IL, U.S.A. (Email: [email protected])
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Weeds are one of the greatest challenges to snap bean production. Anecdotal observation posits certain species frequently escape the weed management system by the time of crop harvest, hereafter called residual weeds. The objectives of this work were to 1) quantify the residual weed community in snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown for processing across the major growing regions in the U.S., and 2) investigate linkages between the density of residual weeds and their contributions to weed canopy cover. In surveys of 358 fields across the Northwest (NW), Midwest (MW), and Northeast (NE), residual weeds were observed in 95% of the fields. While a total of 109 species or species-group were identified, one to three species dominated the residual weed community of individual fields in most cases. It was not uncommon to have >10 weeds m-2 with a weed canopy covering >5% of the field’s surface area. Some of the most abundant and problematic species or species-group escaping control included amaranth species (such as smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L.), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.), and waterhemp [Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer]), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), large crabgrass [Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop.], and ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea Jacq.). Emerging threats include hophornbeam copperleaf (Acalypha ostryifolia Riddell) in the MW and sharppoint fluvellin [Kickxia elatine (L.) Dumort.] in the NW. Beyond crop losses due to weed interference, the weed canopy at harvest poses a risk to contaminating snap bean products with foreign material. Random forest modeling predicts the residual weed canopy is dominated by common lambsquarters, large crabgrass, carpetweed (Mollugo verticillata L.), I. hederacea, amaranth species, and A. ostryifolia. This is the first quantitative report on the weed community escaping control in U.S. snap bean production.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America 2024