Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T06:04:48.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volatility of Trifluralin from Field Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. B. Hollingsworth
E. B. Hollingsworth*
Affiliation:
South. Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two methods of obtaining air samples were used over 4-month periods in 1976 and 1977 to quantitate trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) vapors arising from a silt loam. With the first method, only the air from an enclosure covering 0.37 m2 of soil was sampled. The second method used air probes to sample the air above the field. Rainfall and resultant soil moisture were related to trifluralin vaporization from field soil. Soon after trifluralin incorporation (0.84 kg/ha) and, while the soil was relatively dry, there was very little herbicide vaporization. Trifluralin vapors accumulated rapidly during a period in which several centimeters of rain fell, but with continued precipitation the vapor density declined. The influence of rainfall and resultant soil moisture upon vaporization became less apparent as the soil concentration of the herbicides declined. Less than 0.5% of the applied trifluralin was detected as vapors during each 4-month period.

Keywords

Vapor lossvapor densitysoil moisture
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 224 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.Google Scholar
2. Harper, L. A., White, A. W. Jr., Bruce, R. R., Thomas, A. W., and Leonard, R. A. 1976. Soil and microclimate effects on trifluralin volatilization. J. Environ. Qual. 5:236–242.Google Scholar
3. Ketchersid, M. L., Bovey, R. W., and Merkel, M. G. 1969. The detection of trifluralin vapors in air. Weed Sci. 17:484–485.Google Scholar
4. Parochetti, J. V. and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469–473.Google Scholar
5. Parka, S. J. and Tepe, J. B. 1969. The disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Parr, J. F. and Smith, S. 1973. Degradation of trifluralin under laboratory conditions and soil anaerobiosis. Soil Sci. 115:55–63.Google Scholar
7. Savage, K. E. 1973. Nitralin and trifluralin persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 21:285–288.Google Scholar
8. Spencer, W. F. and Cliath, M. M. 1974. Factors affecting vapor loss of trifluralin from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:987–991.Google Scholar
9. Thompson, J. F. 1972. Manual of Analytical Methods. Sect. 8-B, Sampling and analysis of pesticides in air. Pages 1–12. Primate and Pesticide Effects Laboratory. EPA, Perrine, Florida.Google Scholar
10. Zimdahl, R. L. and Gwynn, S. M. 1977. Soil degradation of three dinitroanilines. Weed Sci. 25:247–251.Google Scholar