Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:43:14.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Growth and Development in Conventional and No-Tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael S. Defelice ,
William W. Witt  and
Michael Barrett
Michael S. Defelice
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
William W. Witt
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Michael Barrett
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Monoculture velvetleaf had greater dry weight, growth rate, leaf area index, and height than velvetleaf grown in association with conventional or no-tillage corn. Velvetleaf planted 5 weeks after corn had significantly lower dry weight, leaf area index, and height compared to velvedeaf planted at the same time as corn. The combination of interference from corn and delayed planting caused a significant reduction in velvetleaf population at the end of the season, delayed the date of 50% velvetleaf flowering, increased the number of days required for 50% flowering, and reduced the number of capsules per plant. Velvetleaf dry weight/hectare and leaf area index increased as plant population increased. Velvetleaf dry weight, leaf area, capsules, and seed/plant decreased as plant density increased. There were no differences in vegetative or reproductive growth between velvetleaf grown in conventional or no-tillage areas.

Keywords

Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medic. #3 ABUTHcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3369A’Interferenceleaf area indexvelvetleaf growth rateABUTH
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 609 - 615
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] : I. Growth Weed Res. 23:91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Dekker, J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1983. Interference between velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] : II. Population dynamics. Weed Res. 23:103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bauman, T. T., Williams, J. L. Jr., and Schreiber, M. M. 1980. Growth analysis of soybean (Glycine max) in competition with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 28:729–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Harper, J. L. and Gajic, D. 1961. Experimental studies of the mortality and plasticity of a weed. Weed Res. 1:91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Higgens, R. A., Staniforth, D. W., and Pedigo, P. C. 1984. Effects of weed density and defoliated or undefoliated soybeans (Glycine max) on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) development. Weed Sci. 32:511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hill, J. D. and Blevins, R. L. 1973. Quantitative soil moisture use in corn grown under conventional and no-tillage methods. Agron. J. 65:945–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. LaCroix, L. J. and Staniforth, D. W. 1964. Seed dormancy in velvetleaf. Weeds. 12:171–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Martin, J. R. 1984. Weed problems in Kentucky. Weed Control Spotlight. Univ. Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 2:1.Google Scholar
10. Moschler, W. W., Shear, G. M., Martens, D. C., Jones, G. D., and Wilmouth, R. R. 1972. Comparative yield and fertilizer efficiency of no-tillage and conventionally tilled corn. Agron. J. 64:229–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Oliver, L. R. 1979. Influence of soybean (Glycine max) planting date on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) competition. Weed Sci. 27:183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Slack, C. H., Blevins, R. L., and Rieck, C. E. 1978. Effect of soil pH and tillage on persistence of simazine. Weed Sci. 26:145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Spencer, N. R. 1984. Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae), History and Economic Impact in the United States. Econ. Bot. 38:407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Watson, D. J. 1966. Leaf growth in relation to crop yield in Milthorpe, F. L., ed. The Growth of Leaves. Butterworths Scientific Publications, London, England.Google Scholar