Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:52:05.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Uptake and Translocation of Fluazifop in Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Lester D. Grafstrom Jr.
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58105

Abstract

Experiments were conducted on uptake and translocation of butyl ester of 14C-fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl]oxy]phenoxy] propanoic acid} in green foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. # SETVI]. Absorption of 14C-fluazifop reached 67.6% 12 h after treatment with the petroleum oil additive compared to 44.0% when applied alone. Maximum 14C-fluazifop absorption detected was 74.2% after 48 h with the oil additive compared to 58.6% after 72 h when applied alone. Translocation of 14C-fluazifop was greater when applied with the oil additive than alone, but translocation did not increase after 12 h. Absorption and translocation of 14C-fluazifop by green foxtail was greater when applied with the oil additive than alone in all environments. The oil additive overcame the reduced absorption of 14C-fluazifop applied alone with low temperature (20 C), relative humidity (40%), and soil fertility (0.25× strength Hoagland's solution), but not the reduced absorption and translocation with an increase in stress to −10 bars. 14C-fluazifop lost as vapors from the treated green foxtail leaf was 4.1% when applied alone compared to 0.6% when applied with an oil additive.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R. N. 1982. Comparisons of four herbicides applied for grass control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37: 8082.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13-8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cranmer, J. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Environment and BAS 9052 phytotoxicity. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:26.Google Scholar
5. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1985. Uptake and translocation of fluazifop by three annual grasses. Weed Sci. 33:612617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dexter, A. G., Nalewaja, J. D., Rasmusson, D. D., and Buchli, J. 1981. Survey of wild oats and other weeds in North Dakota in 1978 and 1979. North Dakota Res. Rpt. No. 79. 80 pp.Google Scholar
7. Dortenzio, W. A. and Norris, R. F. 1980. The influence of soil moisture on the foliar activity of diclofop. Weed Sci. 28:534539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hendley, P., Dicks, J. W., Monaco, T. J., Slyfield, S. M., Tummon, O. J., and Barrett, J. C. 1985. Translocation and metabolism of pyridinyloxyphenoxy propionate herbicides in rhizomatous quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci. 33:1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R. and Acnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Circ. 347. 32 pp.Google Scholar
10. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. McWhorter, C. G. 1979. The effect of surfactant and environment on the toxicity of metriflufen to soybeans (Glycine max) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci. 27:675679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Nalewaja, J. D., Miller, S. D., and Dexter, A. G. 1982. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide combinations. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 37:7780.Google Scholar
13. Ready, E. L., Bates, J. J., and Ekeh, M. K. 1981. Fluazifop (PP 009): A new selective herbicide for control of perennial and annual grasses. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:112.Google Scholar
14. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., Rogers, L., and Mowers, R. P. 1983. Performance of BAS 9052 applied to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:796800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Reynolds, D. A. and Dexter, A. G. 1983. Effect of environment on grass control from postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:40.Google Scholar
16. Therkilsen, J. A., Ekeh, M. K., Palmer, W. H., and Herberger, J. P. 1981. Fluazifop (PP 009): Control of quackgrass in soybeans in the north central region. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 36:112113.Google Scholar
17. Thomas, A. G., ed. 1982. The 1981 weed survey of cultivated land in Manitoba. Publ. No. 82–1. Agric. Canada, Regina. 124 pp.Google Scholar
18. Veenstra, M. A., Vesecky, J. F., and Hendrick, L. W. 1978. BAS 9052-OH, a new postemergence grass herbicide for soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:69.Google Scholar
19. Wills, G. D. 1984. Toxicity and translocation of sethoxydim in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) as effected by environment. Weed Sci. 32:2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar