Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:23:28.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Triallate Accumulation in Wild Oat and Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. H. Thiele  and
R. L. Zimdahl
G. H. Thiele
Affiliation:
Weed Res. Lab., Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
R. L. Zimdahl
Affiliation:
Weed Res. Lab., Dep. Bot. and Plant Pathol., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of entire barley (Hordeum vulgare ‘Moravian’) seedlings exposed to triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)-diisopropylthiocarbamate] vapor for 5 days after a 5-day germination period resulted in a linear rate of accumulation of triallate, while wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seedlings accumulated triallate for 1/2 to 2 days after exposure with no net accumulation thereafter. Similar accumulation patterns were shown for a similar exposure period when barley and wild oat were seeded 1.3 cm below a triallate-treated soil layer in the greenhouse. More triallate accumulated in wild oat and barley when they were planted in a triallate-treated soil layer than below. Since barley accumulated greater amounts of triallate without injury than wild oat, differential uptake of triallate was not the reason for selectivity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 1976 , pp. 183 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F.M. and Crafts, A.S. 1973. Thiocarbamates. Pages 289–309, in Ashton, F.M. and Crafts, A.S., Mode of Action of Herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, N. Y. Google Scholar
2. Banting, J.D. 1970. Effect of diallate and triallate on wild oat and wheat cells. Weed Sci. 18:80–84.Google Scholar
3. Bowler, D.J. 1973. Economic benefits from controlling wild oats. Span 16:79–81.Google Scholar
4. Fang, S.C. 1969. Thiocarbamates. Pages 147–165 in Kearney, P.C. and Kaufman, D.D., eds. Degradation of herbicides. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, N.Y. Google Scholar
5. Friesen, H.A., Banting, J.D., and Walker, D.R. 1962. The effect of placement and concentration of 2,3-DCDT. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:91–104.Google Scholar
6. Holroyd, J. 1964. Field investigation concerning the selective phytotoxicity of diallate to Avena spp. in wheat and barley. Weed Res. 4:142–166.Google Scholar
7. Nalewaja, J.D. 1970. Wild oats: A presistent and competitive weed. Weeds Today 1(2):10–13.Google Scholar
8. Nalewaja, J.D. 1968. Uptake and translocation of diallate in wheat, barley, flax and wild oat. Weed Sci. 16:309–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Parker, C. 1963. Factors affecting the selectivity of 2,3-dichloroallyldiisopropylthiocarbamate (diallate) against Avena spp. in wheat and barley. Weed Res. 3:259–276.Google Scholar