Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:43:40.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transplanting maize and sorghum reduces Striga hermonthica damage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Andreas Oswald ,
Joel K. Ransom ,
Jürgen Kroschel  and
Joachim Sauerborn
Joel K. Ransom
Affiliation:
CIMMYT, P.O. Box 5186 Lazimpat, Kathmandu, Nepal
Jürgen Kroschel
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, University GH Kassel, Steinstrasse 19, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
Joachim Sauerborn
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Production and Agroecology in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim (380), D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Striga hermonthica is a major threat to cereal production in western Kenya and other parts of the world. In laboratory experiments, maize and sorghum showed some resistance to late Striga attachment and parasitism. Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 in western Kenya to assess the effect of transplanting maize and sorghum, under rain-fed field conditions, on grain yield and Striga parasitism. In transplanted sorghum, Striga emergence was not reduced and sorghum failed to produce grain yield in three out of four seasons. Transplanting maize in all experiments significantly increased grain yield compared to direct seeding. The improved productivity was largely associated with less Striga attachment. Striga densities were considerably lower if maize seedlings were more than 17 d old at transplanting, with decreasing levels of Striga with increasing age of the maize seedlings. Seedlings transplanted before they were 15 d old did not reduce Striga attachment. Transplanting maize under rain-fed conditions is probably only suitable for small areas that are highly infested with Striga, due to its high labor requirements. Under these conditions, crop yield can be more than doubled. An incentive to using this method by small-scale farmers would be that the main input at risk is their own labor. However, the establishment of nurseries and the timing of the transplanting operation require a certain level of farm management that could constrain the adoption of this technique.

Keywords

Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benthmaize = corn, Zea mays L. ‘Hybrid 511’sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘Seredo’Parasitic weedsintegrated weed management
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 49 , Issue 3 , June 2001 , pp. 346 - 353
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Andrews, F. W. 1945. The parasitism of Striga hermonthica Benth. on Sorghum spp. under irrigation. I. Preliminary results and the effect of heavy and light irrigation on Striga attack. Ann. Appl. Biol. 32:193–200.Google Scholar
Berner, D. K., Ikie, F. O., and Aigbokhan, E. I. 1995. Some control measures for Striga hermonthica utilizing critical infection period on maize and sorghum. Pages 267–272 In Jewell, D. C., Waddington, S. R., Ransom, J. K., and Pixley, K. V., eds. Maize Research for Stress Environments. Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conf. Mexico, D. F.: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Cechin, I and Press, M. C. 1993. The influence on growth and photosynthesis of sorghum infected with Striga hermonthica from different provenances. Weed Res. 34:289–298.Google Scholar
Dawoud, D. A., Sauerborn, J., and Kroschel, J. 1996. Transplanting of sorghum: a method to reduce yield losses caused by the parasitic weed Striga . Pages 777–785 In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research—Proceedings of the Sixth Parasitic Weed Symposium. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia.Google Scholar
Graves, J. D., Press, M. C., and Steward, G. R. 1989. A carbon balance model of the sorghum-Striga hermonthica host parasite association. Plant Cell Environ. 12:101–107.Google Scholar
Gurney, A. L., Press, M. C., and Scholes, J. D. 1999. Infection time and density influence the response of sorghum to the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica . New Phytol. 143:573–580.Google Scholar
Maranthée, J. P. 1991. Transplant techniques put maize on the fast track. Ceres FAO Rev. 132 (23): 8–9.Google Scholar
Oliver, A., Benhamou, N., and Leroux, G. D. 1991. Mechanisms of resistance to Striga hermonthica in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Pages 127–136 In Ransom, J. K., Musselman, L. J., Worsham, A. D., and Parker, C., eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Parasitic Weeds. Nairobi: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Press, M. C., Gurney, A. L., Frost, D. L., and Scholes, J. D. 1996. How does the parasitic angiosperm Striga hermonthica influence host growth and carbon relations. Pages 301–310 In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research—Proceedings of the Sixth Parasitic Weed Symposium. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia.Google Scholar
Ransom, J. K., Odhiambo, G. D., Eplee, R. E., and Diallo, A. O. 1996. Estimates from field studies of the phytotoxic effects of Striga spp. on maize. Pages 327–333 In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research—Proceedings of the Sixth Parasitic Weed Symposium. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia.Google Scholar
Rehm, S. 1989. Hirsen. Pages 79–86 In Rehm, S., ed. Spezieller Pflanzenbau in den Tropen und Subtropen. Stuttgart, Germany: Eugen Ulmer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. W. and Hanway, J. J. 1984. How a Corn Plant Develops. Ames, IA: Cooperative Extension Service, Special Report 48.Google Scholar
Sauerborn, J. 1991. Parasitic Flowering Plants—Ecology and Management. Weikersheim, Germany: Josef Margraf. 127 p.Google Scholar
Scheffer, K. 1988. Neue Möglichkeiten der Fruchtfolgegestaltung und Biomasseproduktion durch das Pflanzverfahren bei Vermaidung von Bodenerosion, Nitrateintrag und Gülleüberdüngung. VDLUFA-Schriftenreihe 28, Kongreßband 1988, Teil II. pp. 431–422.Google Scholar
Singh, L., Ndikawa, R., and Rao, M. R. 1991. Integrated approach to Striga management on sorghum in North Cameroon. Pages 223–231 In Ransom, J. K., Musselman, L. J., Worsham, A. D., and Parker, C., eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Parasitic Weeds. Nairobi, Kenya: CIMMYT.Google Scholar
Tinh, N. H., Hao, P. X., Harrington, L., and Read, M. 1993. Winter M in the Red River Delta of Northern Vietnam: Problems and Prospects. Bangkok, Thailand: National Maize Research Institute (Vietnam) and CIMMYT. 49 p.Google Scholar
Touré, M., Oliver, A., Ntare, B. R., and St-Pierre, C. A. 1996. The influence of sowing date and irrigation of cowpea on Striga gesnerioides emergence. Pages 787–794 In Moreno, M. T., Cubero, J. I., Berner, D., Joel, D., Musselman, L. J., and Parker, C., eds. Advances in Parasitic Plant Research—Proceedings of the Sixth Parasitic Weed Symposium. Cordoba, Spain: Junta de Andalucia.Google Scholar