Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:28:04.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of Different 2,4-D, Bentazon, Diclofop, or Diclofop-Methyl Combinations in Oat (Avena sativa) and Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Chris Hall
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Lloyd V. Edgington
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Clayton M. Switzer
Affiliation:
Dep. Environ. Biol., Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1

Abstract

Oat (Avena sativa L. ‘Elgin′) and soybean (Glycine max L. ‘Evans′) were treated with 14C-diclofop-methyl {methyl ester of 2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propionic acid]} or 14C-diclofop alone or in combination with 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] or bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] and 14C-2,4-D alone or in combination with diclofop-methyl or diclofop. More radioactivity was recovered in the treatment zone after 14C-diclofop-methyl applications, alone or in combination, than after similar 14C-diclofop treatments in oat and soybean. Basipetal movement of radioactivity was 4 and 1% and acropetal movement was 1 and 4% in oat and soybean, respectively, regardless of the diphenyl ether treatment or time. Addition of 2,4-D or bentazon did not reduce translocation of radioactivity from 14C-diclofop-methyl treatments in either plant species. Basipetal movement of radioactivity from 14C-diclofop-methyl was greater than from 14C-diclofop in both oat and soybean. The addition of diclofop-methyl or diclofop did not affect the pattern or amount of 14C-2,4-D radioactivity translocated. In oats, radioactivity appeared to accumulate within the intercalary meristematic region with 14C-2,4-D and 14C-diphenyl-ether applications. Diclofop-methyl at 1 kg/ha applied either to an entire oat plant at the three-leaf stage or the apical meristemic region resulted in plant mortality. The extent to which transport contributes to diclofop-methyl efficacy is questioned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brezeanu, A. G., Davis, D. G., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1976. Ultrastructural effects and translocation of methyl-2-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy-phenoxy)propanoate in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oat (Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 54:20382048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chow, P.N.P. 1974. Evaluation of Hoe 23408 mixtures for control of wild oats and green foxtail in barley. Res. Rep. Can. Weed Comm. (Western Section). pp. 352353.Google Scholar
3. Crafts, A. A. and Yamaguchi, S. 1958. Comparative tests on the uptake and distribution of labelled herbicides by Zebrina pendula and Tradescantia fluminensis . Hilgardia 27:421454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Fang, S. C. and Butts, J. S. 1954. Studies in plant metabolism. 3. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of radioactive 2,4-D in corn and wheat plants. Plant Physiol. 29:5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Forde, B. J. 1965. Differentiation and continuity of the phloem in the leaf intercalary meristem of Lolium perenne . Am. J. Bot. 52:953961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Friesen, H. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., and VandenBorn, W. H. 1976. Hoe 23408, a new selective herbicide for wild oats and green foxtail in wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:567578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Gallup, A. H. and Gustafson, F. G. 1952. Absorption and translocation of radioactive 2,4-dichloro-5-iodo-phenoxyacetic acid by green plants. Plant Physiol. 27:603612.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Gogan, G. W., Jennings, V. M., and Staniforth, D. W. 1977. Soybean herbicide evaluations across Iowa. 1976. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:7781.Google Scholar
9. Hill, B. D., Todd, B. G., and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. Effect of 2,4-D on the hydrolysis of diclofop-methyl in wild oat (Avena fatua . Weed Sci. 28:725729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Jacobsen, L. 1951. Maintenance of iron supply in nutrient solutions by single addition of ferric potassium ethylenediamine tetra-acetate. Plant Physiol. 26:411413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Olson, W. A. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1981. Antagonistic effects of MCPA on wild oat (Avena fatua) control with diclofop. Weed Sci. 29:566571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Olson, W. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1982. Effect of MCPA on 14C-diclofop uptake and translocation. Weed Sci. 30:5963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. O'Sullivan, P. A., Friesen, H. A., and VandenBorn, W. H. 1976. Influence of herbicides for broadleaved weeds and adjuvants with diclofop-methyl on wild oat control. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:117125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Qureshi, F. A. and VandenBorn, W. H. 1979. Spray droplet distribution and herbicide uptake in sequential applications of diclofop-methyl and MCPA for weed control in barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:9398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Qureshi, F. A. and VandenBorn, W. H. 1979. Interaction of diclofop-methyl and MCPA on wild oats (Avena fatua . Weed Sci. 27:202205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Shimabukuro, M. A., Shimabukuro, R. H., Nord, W. S., and Hoerauf, R. F. 1978. Physiological effects of methyl-2-(4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy)propanoate on oat, wild oat and wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 8:199207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shimabukuro, R. H., Hoerauf, R. H., and Walsh, W. C. 1980. Antagonism of auxin-induced growth responses by diclofop in whole plants and tissue culture. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 100.Google Scholar
18. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop-methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua), and green foxtail (Setaria viridis . Weed Sci. 25:382385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop-methyl toxicity to wild oat (Avena fatua . Weed Sci. 28:371377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Van Der Zweep, W. 1961. The movement of labelled 2,4-D in young barley plants. Weed Res. 1:258266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Walter, H., Koch, W., and Muller, F. 1980. Einfluss des applikationsortes auf die penetration und translokation von diclofop-methyl bei flughafer (Avena sativa L.). Weed Res. 20:325331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Woldetatios, T. and Harvey, R. G. 1977. Diclofop and bentazon interactions on soybeans and annual weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:4243.Google Scholar
23. Woldetatios, T. and Harvey, R. G. 1980. Effects of bentazon, diclofop, and bentazon plus diclofop on the uptake of 14C-bentazon and 14C-diclofop in corn, giant foxtail (Setaria faberii Herrm.) and soybeans. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 102.Google Scholar