Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:46:38.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of Bentazon in Soybeans and Common Cocklebur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. D. Wills*
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and Forest. Exp. Sta., Stoneville, MS 38776

Abstract

Translocation of 14C-labeled and toxicity of nonradiolabeled bentazon [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4)3H-one 2,2-dioxide] was determined for common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum Wallr.) and soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Significantly greater 14C-movement and herbicide toxicity occurred in common cocklebur growing in wet soil at field capacity than in dry soil near the wilting point. In common cocklebur there was a trend toward greater bentazon toxicity and 14C-translocation at high temperature (35 C) and high relative humidity (RH) (96%) than at low temperature (25 C) and low RH (35%). ‘Lee 68’ soybeans were injured less than 10% by bentazon under any environmental condition of this study. Translocation of 14C was primarily acropetal in both common cocklebur and soybeans. Herbicide movement was affected by leaf maturity with the greatest movement of 14C resulting from 14C-bentazon applied to the most mature common cocklebur leaf near the base of the shoot and to soybeans at the youngest fully expanded leaf near the apex of the shoot. Bentazon was more toxic and 14C translocation was greater in the soybean cultivar ‘Hurrelbrink’ than ‘Hill’ or Hill X Hurrelbrink cross.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersen, R.N. 1964. Differential response of corn inbreds to simazine and atrazine. Weeds 12:6061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Andersen, R.N., Lueschen, W.E., Warnes, D.D., and Nelson, W.W. 1974. Controlling broadleaf weeds in soybeans with bentazon in Minnesota. Weed Sci. 22:136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Barrentine, W.L. and McWhorter, C.G. 1972. Cocklebur control with BAY-94337 and bentazon in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:104.Google Scholar
4. Burnside, O.C. 1972. Tolerance of soybean cultivars to weed competition and herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:294297.Google Scholar
5. Crafts, A.S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. Calif. Agric. Exp. Sta. Manual 35.143 pp.Google Scholar
6. Gossett, B.J., Reinhardt, L.R., and Byrd, W.P. 1972. Cocklebur control in soybeans with 2,4-DB and chloroxuron. Weed Sci. 20:489491.Google Scholar
7. Hayes, R.M. and Wax, L.M. 1975. Differential intraspecific responses of soybean cultivars to bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:516521.Google Scholar
8. Mahoney, M.D. and Penner, Donald. 1975. Bentazon translocation and metabolism in soybean and navy bean. Weed Sci. 23:265271.Google Scholar
9. Mahoney, M.D. and Penner, Donald. 1975. The basis for bentazon selectivity in navy bean, cocklebur, and black nightshade. Weed Sci. 23:272276.Google Scholar
10. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1966. Cocklebur control in soybeans with 2,4-DB. Weeds 14:187190.Google Scholar
11. McWhorter, C.G. and Hartwig, E.E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:5659.Google Scholar
12. Nalewaja, J.D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K.A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504507.Google Scholar
13. Osgood, R.V., Romanowski, R.R., and Hilton, H.W. 1972. Differential tolerance of Hawaiian sugarcane cultivars to diuron. Weed Sci. 20:537539.Google Scholar
14. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1965. Losses in agriculture. Agricultural Handbook No. 291. 120 pp.Google Scholar
15. Wax, L.M., Bernard, R.L., and Hayes, R.M. 1974. Response of soybean cultivars to bentazon, bromoxynil, chloroxuron, and 2,4–DB. Weed Sci. 22:3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Weishar, A.L., Carter, C.W., and Veenstra, M.A. 1971. BAS 3512-H, a new postemergence broadleaf herbicide for soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:50.Google Scholar
17. Wuerzer, B., Thompson, J., and Daniel, J.W. 1972. Application rate and timing of BAS 3512-H in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:108110.Google Scholar
18. Zaunbrecher, S.J. and Rogers, R.L. 1972. A study of the herbicidal activity of BASF-3512-H. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:107.Google Scholar