Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:27:58.958Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Translocation and Fate of Dicamba, Picloram, and Triclopyr in Horsenettle, Solanum carolinense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard M. Gorrell ,
Samuel W. Bingham  and
Chester L. Foy
Richard M. Gorrell
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Samuel W. Bingham
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Chester L. Foy
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., and Weed Sci., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine the extent of translocation from the foliage to fleshy roots, the inherent toxicity, and the fate of radiolabeled and nonlabeled dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr in horsenettle. Roots of horsenettle acted as the major sink for photosynthate accumulation at the 0.2- to 0.5-bloom growth stages as determined by autoradiography. Dicamba, picloram, and triclopyr were translocated into the roots of horsenettle and accumulation continued for at least 16 days. 14C associated with each herbicide found in the roots ranged from 1.3% at 4 days to 3.8% at 16 days. After 16 days, slightly more 14C from plants treated with dicamba and triclopyr (3.8 and 3.6%) than picloram (3.0%) was translocated to roots. These compounds were metabolized slowly in the foliage and roots as determined by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) and autoradiography. In translocation studies with horsenettle shoots, picloram at 1.12 kg/ha killed the treated and untreated shoots and roots. Dicamba and triclopyr at the highest rates killed the treated shoots and partially destroyed the root system. Symptoms were noted on the untreated shoots, but full recovery occurred at 8 weeks. Since each of the herbicides was metabolized slowly and only slight differences in their translocation were observed, the relatively higher herbicidal effectiveness of picloram must be attributed to its greater inherent potency.

Keywords

dicamba, 3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acidpicloram, 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acidtriclopyr, [(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinyl)oxy] acetic acidSolanum carolinense L. #3 SOLCA
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , July 1988 , pp. 447 - 452
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Agbakoba, C.S.O. and Goodin, J. R. 1969. Effect of stage of growth of field bindweed on absorption and translocation of 14C-labeled 2,4-D and picloram. Weed Sci. 17:436–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Banks, P. A., Kirby, M. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1977. Influence of postemergence and subsurface layered herbicides on horsenettle and peanuts. Weed Sci. 25:5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Broadhurst, N. A., Montgomery, M. L., and Freed, V. H. 1966. Metabolism of 2-methoxy-3,6-dichlorobenzoic acid (dicamba) by wheat and bluegrass plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 14:585–588.Google Scholar
4. Burchfield, H. P., Johnson, D. C., and Storrs, E. E. 1965. Guide to the Analysis of Pesticide Residues. U.S. Dep. Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington, DC. Vol. 1. Sec. IV B.1(1)-B-2.Google Scholar
5. Chang, F. Y. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Translocation and metabolism of dicamba in Tartary buckwheat. Weed Sci. 19:107–112.Google Scholar
6. Chang, F. Y. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1971. Dicamba uptake, translocation, metabolism, and selectivity. Weed Sci. 19:113–117.Google Scholar
7. Chang, F. Y. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1968. Translocation of dicamba in Canada thistle. Weed Sci. 16:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometric 11:1–42.Google Scholar
9. Eliasson, L. 1972. Response of Populus tremula to picloram and other translocated herbicides. Physiol. Plant. 27:101–104.Google Scholar
10. Eliasson, L. and Hallmen, U. 1973. Translocation and metabolism of picloram and 2,4-D in Populus tremula . Physiol. Plant. 28:182–187.Google Scholar
11. Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1978. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) fleshy roots in pasture Weed Sci. 29:586–589.Google Scholar
12. Hoffman, G. O., Merkle, M. C., and Haas, R. H. 1972. Controlling mesquite with Tordon 225 mixture herbicide in Texas backland prairie. Down Earth 27(4):16–19.Google Scholar
13. Ilnicki, R. D., Tisdell, T. F., Fertig, S. N., and Furrer, A. H. Jr. 1962. Life History Studies as Related to Weed Control in the Northeast. 3–Horsenettle. Northeast Reg. Publ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. Rhode Island, Kingston. Bull. 368. 54 pp.Google Scholar
14. Meikle, R. W., Williams, E. A., and Redemann, C. T. 1966. Metabolism of Tordon herbicide (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) in cotton and decomposition in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 14:384.Google Scholar
15. Palmer, R. D. and Miears, F. 1975. Horsenettle control in pasture of Sabine County, Texas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:82–90.Google Scholar
16. Quimby, P. C. Jr. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1971. Selectivity of dicamba in wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Sci. 19:598–601.Google Scholar
17. Radosevich, S. R. and Bayer, D. E. 1979. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on triclopyr, picloram, and 2,4,5-T translocation. Weed Sci. 27:22–27.Google Scholar