Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T07:17:01.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxicity, Absorption, Translocation, and Metabolism of 2,4-D in Yellow Nutsedge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

V. M. Bhan
Affiliation:
U. P. Agricultural University, Pantnager, India
E. W. Stoller
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service
F. W. Slife
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

Abstract

We sprayed yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus L.) with 0.56, 1.12, and 2.24 kg/ha of (2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) at the two and four-leaf stages in both field and growth chamber studies. Compared to non-treated plants, these rates significantly reduced shoot weight, rhizome weight, and rhizome number 12 days after application. There were no significant differences in these growth responses among the rates tested, when applied one, two, and three times at consecutive 12-day intervals. We pretreated two and four-leaf plants with 0.56, 1.12, and 2.24 kg/ha of 2,4-D immediately before foliar application of 14C-2,4-D. The increase in pretreatment rates decreased the percentage of the applied radioactivity which was absorbed and translocated. Of the radioactivity absorbed, a rather constant percentage translocated from the treated area in the different treatments. The radioactivity translocated from the application site for at least 288 hr after treatment. Less than 19% of the 14C-2,4-D applied was absorbed into the leaves 24 hr after application. Ninety-eight to 100% of the methanol-soluble radioactivity that translocated to developing leaves, rhizomes, and roots chromatographed identically to 14C-2,4-D.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, O. 1958. Studies on the absorption and translocation of amitrol (2-amino-1,2,4-triazole) by nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.). Weeds 6:370385.Google Scholar
2. Bell, R. S. and Bannister, E. J. 1955. Chemical control of northern nutgrass in potato fields. No. East. Weed Contr. Conf. 9:231234.Google Scholar
3. Bell, R. S., Lachman, W. H., Rahn, E. M. and Sweet, R. D. 1962. Life history studies as related to weed control in Northeast. 1. Nutgrass. Rhode Island Agr. Sta. Bull. 364. 33 p.Google Scholar
4. Bhan, V. M. 1966. Effect of chemical and mechanical practices on control of nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus L.) in rotation, fallow-gram. Ind. J. Agron. 11:211215.Google Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. 1967. Herbicide behaviour in the plant, p. 75110. In: Audus, L. J. (Ed.) The Physiology and Biochemistry of Herbicides. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
7. Hauser, E. W. 1963. Response of purple nutsedge to amitrole, 2,4-D and EPTC. Weeds 11:251252.Google Scholar
8. Hauser, E. W. and Thompson, J. T. 1956. Progress report of the differential response of the nutgrasses (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) to herbicides and disking. Proc. So. Weed Conf. 9:211219.Google Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method of growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
10. Orsenigo, J. R. and Smith, O. 1953. The chemical control of northern nutgrass, Cyperus esculentus L. No. East Weed Contr. Conf. 7:329339.Google Scholar
11. Slife, F. W., Key, J. L., Yamaguchi, S., and Crafts, A. S., 1962. Penetration, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T in wild and cultivated cucumber plants. Weeds 10:2935.Google Scholar
12. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Federal Extension Service and Economic Research Service. 1968. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds, 1965. ARS 34–102, 85 p.Google Scholar