Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:38:17.881Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Toward a comprehensive information system to assist invasive species management in Hawaii and Pacific Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark Fornwall  and
Lloyd Loope
Lloyd Loope
Affiliation:
USGS Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, P.O. Box 369, Makawao, Maui, HI 96768
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The need for coordinated regional and global electronic databases to assist prevention, early detection, rapid response, and control of biological invasions is well accepted. The Pacific Basin Information Node (PBIN), a node of the National Biological Information Infrastructure, has been increasingly engaged in the invasive species enterprise since its establishment in 2001. Since this time, PBIN has sought to support frontline efforts at combating invasions, through working with stakeholders in conservation, agriculture, forestry, health, and commerce to support joint information needs. Although initial emphasis has been on Hawaii, cooperative work with other Pacific islands and countries of the Pacific Rim is already underway and planned.

Keywords

Miconia calvescensbiological surveysdata integrationinformation servicesdecision support systems
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 52 , Issue 5 , October 2004 , pp. 854 - 856
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

References

Literature Cited

Allison, A. 2003. Biological surveys—new perspectives in the pacific. Org. Divers. Evol 3:103–110.Google Scholar
Allison, A. and Miller, S. E. 2000. Hawaii biological survey: museum resources in support of conservation. Pages 281–290 in Raven, P. H. and Williams, T. eds. Nature and Human Society: The Quest for a Sustainable World. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences and Natural Research Council.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. C. 2001. The science of risk assessment for phytosanitary regulation and the impact of changing trade regulations. BioScience 51:148–153.Google Scholar
Daehler, C. C. and Denslow, J. 2004. A risk assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawaii and other Pacific islands. Conserv. Biol 18:360–368.Google Scholar
D'Antonio, C. M. and Dudley, T. L. 1995. Biological invasions as agents of change on islands versus mainlands. Pages 123–134 in Vitousek, P., Loope, L., and Adsersen, H. eds. Biological Diversity and Ecosystem Function on Islands. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Denslow, J. S. 2003. Weeds in paradise: thoughts on the invasibility of tropical islands. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard 90:119–127.Google Scholar
Holt, A. 1996. An alliance of biodiversity, health, agriculture, and business interests for improved alien species management in Hawaii. Pages 155–160 in Sandlund, O. T., Schei, P. J., and Viken, A. eds. Proceedings of the Norway/UN Conference on Alien Species. Trondheim, Norway: Directorate for Nature Management and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research. www.hear.org/alienspeciesinhawaii/articles/norway.htm.Google Scholar
Kreith, M. and Golino, D. 2003. Regulatory framework and institutional players. Pages 19–33 in Sumner, D. A. ed. Exotic Pests and Diseases: Biology and Economics for Biosecurity. Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.Google Scholar
Loope, L. L. 1998. Hawaii and Pacific islands. Pages 747–774 in Mac, M. J., Opler, P. A., Puckett Haecker, C. E., and Doran, P. D. eds. Status and Trends of the Nation's Biological Resources. Volume 2. Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey. www.hear.org/AlienSpeciesInHawaii/articles/hawaii_and_the_Pacific.pdf.Google Scholar
Loope, L. L. 2004. New Zealand's border protection quarantine and surveillance: a potential model for Hawaii. Ecol. Restor 22:69–70.Google Scholar
Loope, L. L., Howarth, F. G., Kraus, F., and Pratt, T. K. 2001. Newly emergent and future threats of alien species to Pacific landbirds and ecosystems. Stud. Avian Biol 22:291–294.Google Scholar
Loope, L. L. and Reeser, D. W. 2002. Crossing boundaries at Haleakala: addressing invasive species through partnerships. Pages 29–34 in Harmon, D. ed. Crossing Boundaries in Park Management, Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Research and Resource Management in Parks and on Public Lands; April 2001.Google Scholar
[NRC] National Research Council. 1993. A Biological Survey for the Nation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 205 p.Google Scholar
[PCAST] President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. 1998. Teaming with Life: Investing in Science to Understand and Use America's Living Capital. www.whitehouse.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/Environment/html/teamingcove.html.Google Scholar
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A., and Halloy, S. R. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manage 57:239–251.Google Scholar
Vanderwoude, C. 2003. Testimony: Parliament of Australia, Senate, Inquiry into the Regulation, Control and Management of Invasive Species and the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Amendment (Invasive Species) Bill 2002, Submission List, No. 19. www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/ecita_ctte/invasive_species/submissions/sublist.htm.Google Scholar
Van Driesche, J. 2002. Using the internet to build a conservation network. Conservation in Practice. Summer 2002. www.hear.org/articles/cip_summer2002v3n3_hear.pdf.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. 1981. Island Populations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 286 p.Google Scholar