Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:09:12.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tolerance of Cicer Milkvetch (Astragalus cicer) Seedlings to Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charley E. Townsend  and
Edward E. Schweizer
Charley E. Townsend
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Edward E. Schweizer
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Crops Res. Lab., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Tolerance of cicer milkvetch (Astragalus cicer L.) seedlings to 2,4-DB [4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butyric acid], 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid], and phenoxy-diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)-phenoxy] propanoic acid} mixtures was evaluated in greenhouse and field experiments. In the greenhouse, seedlings in the cotyledonary and primary-leaf stages of growth were more susceptible to 2,4-DB alone and to combinations of 2,4-DB plus diclofop than seedlings in the second- through the fifth-leaf stages. All rates of 2,4-D with or without diclofop (1.7 kg ae/ha rate) reduced seedling growth at all stages of development. In the field, 2,4-DB with or without diclofop did not reduce seedling growth. Seedling growth was suppressed by 2,4-D alone at rates of 1.02 and 1.36 kg ae/ha throughout the growing season. All combinations of 2,4-D plus diclofop suppressed seedling growth, but the suppression was particularly apparent at rates of 0.68 kg ae/ha or higher of 2,4-D.

Keywords

2,4-D2,4-DBphenoxy-diclofop mixturesstand lossdiclofop-phenoxy mixtures
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Davis, A. M. 1972. Selenium accumulation in Astragalus species. Agron. J. 64:751–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Davis, A. M. 1973. Protein, crude fiber, tannin, and oxalate concentrations of some introduced Astragalus species. Agron. J. 65:613–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Devine, T. E., Seaney, R. R., Linscott, D. L., Hagin, R. D., and Brace, N. 1975. Results of breeding for tolerance to 2,4-D in birdsfoot trefoil. Crop Sci. 15:721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Moyer, J. R., Smoliak, S., and Johnston, A. 1979. Tolerance of seedling cicer milkvetch to herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:1155–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Peters, E. J. 1964. Preemergence, preplanting, and postemergence herbicides for alfalfa and birdsfoot trefoil. Agron. J. 56:415–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Peters, E. J. and Lowance, S. A. 1971. Establishment of crown-vetch with herbicides. Agron. J. 63:230–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Peters, E. J. and Lowance, S. A. 1972. Bromoxynil, chloroxynil, and 2,4-DB for establishing alfalfa and medium red clover. Weed Sci. 20:140–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua), and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 25:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1980. The basis of the antagonistic effect of 2,4-D on diclofop methyl toxicity to wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 28:371–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Townsend, C. E. 1980. Registration of Monarch cicer milkvetch. Crop Sci. 20:670–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Townsend, C. E., Christensen, D. K., and Dotzenko, A. D. 1978. Yield and quality of cicer milkvetch forage as influenced by cutting frequency. Agron. J. 70:109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Williams, M. C., James, L. F., and Bleak, A. T. 1976. Toxicity of introduced nitro-containing Astragalus to sheep, cattle and chicks. J. Range Manage. 29:30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar