Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:26:53.726Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Susceptibility of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Various Postemergence Grass Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joe E. Street  and
Charles E. Snipes
Joe E. Street
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Charles E. Snipes
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Mississippi Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 4-yr study was conducted to evaluate the response of rice (Oryza sativa L. 'Starbonnet′) to sethoxydim {2-[1-(ethoxyimino)butyl]-5-[2-(ethylthio)propyl-3-hydroxy-2-cyclohexen-1-one}, haloxyfop {2-[4-[13-chloro-5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid}, fluazifop {(±)-2-[4-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-pyridinyl] oxy] phenoxy] propanoic acid}, and quizalofop {(±)-2-[4-(6-chloro-2-quinoxalynyloxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid}. In general, rice was more sensitive when herbicides were applied at panicle initiation than at the tillering stage of development. Quizalofop severely reduced rice yield when applied wih a surfactant. Applied at tillering, sethoxydim at 210 g ai/ha did not reduce rice height, grain yield, milling yield, or seed quality.

Keywords

Tolerancesethoxydimfluazifophaloxyfopquizalofop
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 5 , September 1987 , pp. 686 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adair, R. C., Bollich, C. N., Bowman, D. H., Jodon, N. E., Johnston, T. H., Webb, B. D., and Atkins, J. G. 1973. Rice breeding and testing methods in the United States. Pages 22–75 in Rice in the United States: Varieties and Production. Agric. Handb. No. 289. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Google Scholar
2. Anderson, R. N. 1976. Response of monocotyledons to HOE 22870 and HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:266–269.Google Scholar
3. Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinney, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J. 69:911–913.Google Scholar
4. Derr, J. F., Monaco, T. J., and Sheets, T. J. 1985. Response of three grass species to fluazifop. Weed Sci. 33:693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Friesen, H. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. HOE 23408, a new selective herbicide for wild oats and green foxtail in wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:567–578.Google Scholar
6. Hosaka, H., Inaba, H., and Ishikawa, H. 1984. Response of monocotyledons to BAS 9052 OH. Weed Sci. 32:28–32.Google Scholar
7. Kunze, O. R. 1985. Effect of environment and variety on milling qualities of rice. Pages 37–47 in Anonymous. Rice Grain Quality and Marketing. Int. Rice Res. Inst., Manila, Philippines.Google Scholar
8. Snipes, C. E. and Street, J. E. 1987. Fenoxaprop for postemergence barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 35:224–227.Google Scholar
9. Snipes, C. E. and Street, J. E. 1987. Rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to fenoxaprop. Weed Sci. 35:401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Street, J. E. and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1983. Effect of growth stage on rice (Oryza sativa) tolerance to acifluorfen. Weed Sci. 31:672–673.Google Scholar
11. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua), and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 25:382–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar