Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:27:06.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) are Allelopathic to Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gerald R. Leather
Gerald R. Leather*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., P.O. Box 1209 Frederick, MD 21701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory, greenhouse, and field studies were conducted to determine the allelopathic potential of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars to suppress weed germination and growth. Germination of wild mustard [Brassica kaber (DC.) L.C. Wheeler var. pinnatifida (Stokes) L.C. Wheeler] seeds at 25 C in undiluted aqueous extracts of sunflower leaf tissue was inhibited 75%, but was stimulated by up to 150% at 10- and 100-fold dilutions. Stem-tissue extracts at all concentrations stimulated wild mustard seed germination. The germination response of other weed species varied with the sunflower cultivar and concentration of tissue extract. In sand culture, leachates of dried sunflower leaf and stem tissue inhibited broadleaf - weed seedling growth, but had little or no effect on the growth of grass weeds. Sunflower root exudates inhibited seedling growth, but were less effective than leaf and stem tissue leachates. Germination of weed seeds was unaffected by root exudates. Over a 5 -yr period, weed density and percent ground cover increased less in field plots of sunflower than in control plots.

Keywords

Weed seedgerminationseedling growth
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 37 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Altieri, M. A. and Doll, J. D. 1978. The potential of allelopathy as a tool for weed management in crop fields. PANS 24:495–502.Google Scholar
2. Baranov, V. I. 1980. Interaction of phenolic compounds with metallic ions in regulation of growth. Sov. Plant Physiol. 27: 805–811.Google Scholar
3. Bell, D. T. 1974. The influence of osmotic pressure in tests for allelopathy. Trans. 111. State Acad. Sci. 67:312–317.Google Scholar
4. Bell, D. T. and Koeppe, D. E. 1972. Noncompetitive effects of giant foxtail on the growth of corn. Agron. J. 64:321–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cochran, V. L., Elliott, L. F., and Papendick, R. I. 1977. The production of phytotoxins from surface crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41:903–908.Google Scholar
6. Colton, C. E. and Einhellig, F. A. 1980. Allelopathic mechanisms of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic., Malvaceae) on soybean. Am. J. Bot. 67:1407–1413.Google Scholar
7. Dzubenko, N. N. and Petrenko, N. I. 1971. On biochemical interaction of cultivated plants and weeds. Pages 60–66 in Grodzinsky, A. M., ed. Physiological - Biochemical Basis of Plant Interactions in Phytocenoses, Vol. 2. Naukova Dumka, Kiev. (In Russian).Google Scholar
8. Einhellig, F. A. and Rasmussen, J. A. 1973. Allelopathic effects of Rumex crispus on Amaranthus retroflexus, grain sorghum and field corn. Am. Midl. Nat. 90:79–86.Google Scholar
9. Fay, P. K. and Duke, W. B. 1977. An assessment of allelopathic potential in Avena germ plasm. Weed Sci. 25:224–228.Google Scholar
10. Funke, G. L. 1941. Essai de phytosociologie experimentale. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 76:19–21.Google Scholar
11. Goldsmith, F. B. and Harrison, C. M. 1976. Description and analysis of vegetation. Pages 85–155 in Chapman, S. B., ed. Methods in Plant Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
12. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D.I. 1950. The water - culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Manual 347 (rev. ed.). 32.Google Scholar
13. Klein, R. R. and Miller, D. A. 1980. Allelopathy and its role in agriculture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11:43–56.Google Scholar
14. Koeppe, D. E., Rohrbaugh, L. M., Rice, E. L., and Wender, S. H. 1970. Tissue age and caffeoylquinic acid concentration in sunflower. Phytochemistry 9:297–301.Google Scholar
15. Koeppe, D. E., Southwick, L. M., and Bittell, J. E. 1976. The relationship of tissue chlorogenic acid concentrations and leaching of phenolics from sunflowers grown under varying phosphate nutrient conditions. Can. J. Bot. 54:593–599.Google Scholar
16. Lazauskas, P. and Balinevichiute, Z. 1972. Influence of the excretions from Vicia villosa Roth seeds on germination and primary growth of some crops and weeds. Pages 76–79 in Grodzinsky, A. M., ed. Physiological - Biochemical Basis of Plant Interactions in Phytocenoses, Vol. 3. Naukova Dumka. Kiev. (In Russian).Google Scholar
17. Lockerman, R. H. and Putnam, A. R. 1979. Evaluation of allelopathic cucumbers (Cucumis sativus) as an aid to weed control. Weed Sci. 27:54–57.Google Scholar
18. Lockerman, R. H. and Putnam, A. R. 1981. Growth inhibitors in cucumber plants and seeds. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 106:418–422.Google Scholar
19. Massantini, F., Caporali, F., and Zellini, G. 1977. Evidence for allelopathic control of weeds in lines of soybean. Pages 23–28 in Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. (EWRS) Symposium on the Different Methods of Weed Control and Their Integration, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
20. Maun, M. A. 1977. Suppressing effect of soybeans on barnyard grass. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:485–490.Google Scholar
21. McCalla, T. M. and Norstadt, F. A. 1974. Toxicity problems in mulch tillage. Agric. Environ. 1:153–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Nielsen, K. F., Cuddy, T. F., and Woods, W. B. 1960. The influence of the extract of some crops and soil residues on germination and growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:188–197.Google Scholar
23. Overland, L. 1966. The role of allelopathic substances in the “smother crop” barley. Am. J. Bot. 53:423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Prutenskaya, N. I. 1972. Presence of inhibitors and stimulators of Sinapis arvensis L. in germinating seeds of cultivated plants. Pages 73–75 in Grodzinsky, A. M., ed. Physiological-Biochemical Basis of Plant Interactions in Phytocenosis, Vol. 3. Naukova Dumka. Kiev. (In Russian).Google Scholar
25. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1974. Biological suppression of weeds: Evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumbers. Science 185:370–372.Google Scholar
26. Putnam, A. R. and Duke, W. B. 1978. Allelopathy in agroecosystems. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 16:431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Rasmussen, J. A. and Einhellig, F. A. 1975. Noncompetitive effects of common milkweed, Asclepias syriaca L., on germination and growth of grain sorghum. Am. Midl. Nat. 94:478–483.Google Scholar
28. Rice, E. L. 1974. Allelopathy. Academic Press Inc., New York. 353.Google Scholar
29. Rice, E. L. 1979. Allelopathy - An update. Bot. Rev. 45:15–109.Google Scholar
30. Tsuzuki, E., Katsuki, A., Shida, S., and Nagatomo, T. 1977. On the growth inhibitors contained in buckwheat plants. II. The effects of water and organic solvent extracts on the growth of rice seedlings. Bull. Fac. Agric. Univ. Miyazaki 24:41–46.Google Scholar
31. Wallihan, E. F. 1966. Iron. Pages 203–212 in Chapman, H. D., ed. Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils. Div. Agric. Sci., Univ. Calif., Berkeley.Google Scholar
32. Wilson, R. E. and Rice, E. L. 1968. Allelopathy as expressed by Helianthus annuus and its role in old-field succession. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 95:432–448.Google Scholar