Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:15:34.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sulfentrazone sorption, desorption, and mineralization in soils from two tillage systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Krishna N. Reddy  and
Martin A. Locke
Martin A. Locke
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sulfentrazone sorption kinetics, desorption, and mineralization were evaluated in surface 7.5 cm of soils collected from long-term conventional-till (CT) and no-till (NT) plots. The soils used were Miami silt loam and Drummer silty clay loam from Illinois and Dundee silt loam from Mississippi. Sulfentrazone sorption kinetics in Dundee silt loam CT and NT soils were adequately described by a simple two-site equilibrium/kinetic model. Rapid initial sorption (within 1 h) was followed by a slower sorption and equilibrium, largely achieved by 72 h of shaking, with a negligible increase in sorption thereafter. The sorption Kf ranged from 1.02 to 3.44 among the six CT and NT soils. The Kf values were greater for NT compared to their respective CT soils. Overall, Kf values were higher in Drummer silty clay loam followed by Dundee silt loam and Miami silt loam soil. The N values were less than unity in all soils indicating nonlinear sorption. Sulfentrazone desorption was hysteretic with a very low rate of desorption. The total amount desorbed in four desorptions ranged from 58 to 72% of that sorbed. Less than 2.1% of applied 14C-sulfentrazone was mineralized to 14CO2 in Dundee silt loam CT and NT soils during a 77–d incubation. Relatively low mineralization of sulfentrazone suggests poor adaptability of native microbial populations that have not been exposed to this herbicide. Higher sorption and lower desorption of sulfentrazone in NT soils compared to CT soils suggest that NT systems (which tend to increase plant residues) may prolong sulfentrazone residence time in soil.

Keywords

SulfentrazoneAryltriazolinoneadsorptiondegradationdistribution coefficient
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , August 1998 , pp. 494 - 500
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bartha, R. and Pramer, D. 1965. Features of a flask and method for measuring the persistence and biological effects of pesticides in soil. Soil Sci. 100: 68–70.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. L. and Frye, W. W. 1993. Conservation tillage: an ecological approach to soil management. Adv. Agron. 51: 33–78.Google Scholar
Clay, S. A. and Koskinen, W. C. 1990. Characterization of alachlor and atrazine desorption from soils. Weed Sci. 38: 74–80.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Physiological basis for differential sensitivity to sulfentrazone by sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalis). Weed Sci. 44: 12–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PMC Corporation. 1995. Technical Bulletin of Sulfentrazone. Philadelphia: FMC Corporation. 6 p.Google Scholar
Gaston, L. A., Locke, M. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1996. Sorption and degradation of bentazon in conventional- and no-till Dundee soil. J. Environ. Qual. 25: 120–126.Google Scholar
Goetz, A. J., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hajek, B. F. 1989. Sorption and mobility of chlorimuron in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 37: 428–433.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45: 733–738.Google Scholar
Koskinen, W. C. and Harper, S. S. 1990. The retention process: mechanisms. Pages 51-77 in Cheng, H. H., ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modeling. SSSA Book Series 2. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Leung, L. Y., Lyga, J. W., and Robinson, R. A. 1991. Metabolism and distribution of the experimental triazolone herbicide F6285 [1–[2,4–dichloro-5–[N-(mcthylsulfonyl)amino]phenyl]-1,4–dihydro-3–mcthyl-4–(difluoromethyl)-5H-triazol-5–one] in the rat, goat, and hen. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39: 1509–1514.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. 1992. Sorption-desorption kinetics of alachlor in surface soil from two soybean tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual. 21: 558–566.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Bryson, C. T. 1997. Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci. 45: 307–320.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A., Gaston, L. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1996. Alachlor biotransformation and sorption in soil from two soybean tillage systems. J. Agric. Food Chem. 44: 1128–1143.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Harper, S. S. 1991a. Metribuzin degradation in soil. I. Effects of soybean residue amendment, metribuzin level, and soil depth. Pestic. Sci. 31: 221–237.Google Scholar
Locke, M. A. and Harper, S. S. 1991b. Metribuzin degradation in soil. II. Effects of tillage. Pestic. Sci. 31: 239–247.Google Scholar
Ma, L., Southwick, L. M., Willis, G. H., and Selim, H. M. 1993. Hysteretic characteristics of atrazine adsorption–desorption by a Sharkey soil. Weed Sci. 41: 627–633.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Dayan, F. E., and Duke, S. O. 1998. QSAR analysis of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors. Pages 197-233 in Devillers, J., ed. Comparative QSAR. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Gaston, L. A. 1997a. Tillage and cover crop effects on cyanazine adsorption and desorption kinetics. Soil Sci. 162: 501–509.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., Wagner, S. C., Zablorowicz, R. M., Gaston, L. A., and Smeda, R. J. 1995a. Chlorimuron ethyl sorption and desorption kinetics in soils and herbicide-desiccated cover crop residues. J. Agric. Food Chem. 43: 2752–2757.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Locke, M. A., and Zablotowicz, R. M. 1997b. Soil type and tillage effects on sorption of cyanazine and degradation products. Weed Sci. 45: 727–732.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N., Zablotowicz, R. M., and Locke, M. A. 1995b. Chlorimuron adsorption, desorption, and degradation in soils from conventional tillage and no-tillage systems. J. Environ. Qual. 24: 760–767.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS System for Regression. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
van Genuchten, M. Th. 1981. Non-equilibrium Transport Parameters from Miscible Displacement Experiments. Research Rep. 119. Riverside, CA: U.S. Salinity Laboratory.Google Scholar
Wagner, S. C., Zablotowicz, R. M., Locke, M. A., Smeda, R. J., and Bryson, C. T. 1995. Influence of herbicide-desiccated cover crops on biological soil quality in the Mississippi Delta. Pages 86-89 in Kingery, W. L. and Buehring, N., eds. Proceedings—Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University.Google Scholar