Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:49.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spatial Growth of Kikuyugrass (Pennisetum clandestinum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Cheryl A. Wilen
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124
Jodie S. Holt
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Plant Sci., Univ. California, Riverside, CA 92521-0124

Abstract

Photographic techniques and the point-frame transect method were used to study areal growth of kikuyugrass grown in the field without competition in 1990 and 1991. The effect of cutting height on plant extension was also examined in 1991. There were no differences in sward area between eight selections planted in 1990, except on the first measurement date, but selections differed in height and number of primary and secondary stolons. Expansion was irregular in all but one selection, and the patch shape of all irregular selections was defined by the direction and number of the earliest buds to sprout from the stolons. Only two of the eight selections were planted in 1991. Cutting height affected extension from the plot center, linear plant frequency, and plant biomass. The lowest height of cut, 2.5 cm, had the least extension and frequency, the higher cut, 5 cm, was intermediate, and the unmowed plots had the highest extension and frequency. There were differences between selections in number of nodes per unit area, which resulted in differences in response to mowing. Results from a greenhouse clipping experiment showed that although root weight of stolon sections used as propagules was reduced by defoliation, starch content was not affected. The spreading ability of kikuyugrass appears to be based on its ability to branch from its stolons presumably due to reallocation of resources. Based on these results, close mowing could slow the process of kikuyugrass invasion into other turf species but is inadequate to control it.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Auld, B. A. and Coote, B. G. 1980. A model of a spreading plant population. Oikos 34: 287292.Google Scholar
2. Auld, B. A., Menz, K. M., and Monaghan, N. M. 1979. Dynamics of weed spread: implications for policies of public control. Protection Ecol. 1: 141148.Google Scholar
3. Barrett, S. C. H. 1982. Genetic variation in weeds. Pages 7398 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H.L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds With Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
4. Beach, G. A. 1963. Management practices in the care of lawns. Proc. 10th Rocky Mtn. Regional Turf Conf., pp. 4245.Google Scholar
5. Bonham, C. D. 1989. Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation. John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 1924, 108–110.Google Scholar
6. Brede, A. D. 1992. Cultural factors for minimizing bermudagrass invasion into tall fescue turf. Agron. J. 84: 919922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Brower, J. E., Zar, J. H., and von Ende, C. N. 1990. Field and Laboratory Methods for General Ecology. Wm. C. Brown Publishers, Dubuque, Iowa, p. 85.Google Scholar
8. Bullock, J. M., Mortimer, A. M., and Begon, M. 1994. The effect of clipping on interclonal competition in the grass Holcus lantantus: A response surface analysis. J. Ecol. 82: 259270.Google Scholar
9. Carmen, J. G. and Briske, D. D. 1982. Root initiation and root and leaf elongation of dependent little bluestem tillers following defoliation. Agron. J. 74: 432435.Google Scholar
10. Chapman, D. F., Robson, M. J., and Snaydon, R. W. 1992. Physiological integration in the clonal perennial herb Trifolium repens L. Oecologia 89: 338347.Google Scholar
11. Conover, W. J. and Iman, R. L. 1981. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Amer. Stat. 35: 124129.Google Scholar
12. Cudney, D. W., Downer, J. A., Gibeault, V. A., Henry, J. M., and Reints, J. S. 1993. Kikuyugrass (Pennisetum clandestinum) management in turf. Weed Technol. 7: 180184.Google Scholar
13. Dernoeden, P. H., Carroll, M. J., and Krouse, J. M. 1994. Mowing of three fescue species for low moisture turf sites. Crop Sci. 34: 16451649.Google Scholar
14. Edwards, D. C. 1937. Three ecotypes of Pennisetum clandestinum (Hochst) kikuyu grass. Empire J. Exp. Agric. 5: 371377.Google Scholar
15. Forcella, F. 1985. Final distribution is related to rate of spread in alien weeds. Weed Res. 25: 181191.Google Scholar
16. Freeman, M. F. and Tukey, J. W. 1950. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann. Math. Statist. 21: 607611.Google Scholar
17. Griffin, G. F. 1989. An enhanced wheel-point method for assessing cover, structure and heterogeneity in plant communities. J. Range Management 42: 7981.Google Scholar
18. Holt, J. S. 1994. Genetic variation in life history traits in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) from California. Weed Sci. 42: 378384.Google Scholar
19. Horowitz, M. 1972. Spatial growth of Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. Weed Res. 12: 373383.Google Scholar
20. Horowitz, M. 1973. Spatial growth of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Weed Res. 13: 200208.Google Scholar
21. Humphreys, L. R. and Robinson, A. R. 1966. Interrelations of leaf area and non-structural carbohydrate status as determinants of the growth of subtropical grasses. Proc. 10th Int. Grasslands Conf., Pages 113115.Google Scholar
22. Jones, C. A. 1985. C4 Grasses and Cereals. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. pp. 179189.Google Scholar
23. Levy, B. and Madden, E. A. 1933. The point method of pasture analysis. N. Z. J. Agr. 46: 267279.Google Scholar
24. McWhorter, C. G. and Chandler, J. M. 1982. Conventional weed control technology. Pages 528 in Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
25. Moody, M. E. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25: 10091021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Morgan, J. A. and Brown, R. H. 1983. Photosynthesis and growth of bermudagrass swards. I. Carbon dioxide exchange characteristics of swards mowed at weekly and monthly intervals. Crop Sci. 23: 347352.Google Scholar
27. Navas, M.-L. 1991. Using plant population biology in weed research: a strategy to improve weed management. Weed Res. 31: 171179.Google Scholar
28. Reipma, P. and Weng, W. P. 1963. A comparison of methods of recording herbaceous weeds in weed control experiments. Weed Res. 3: 2634.Google Scholar
29. Richards, J. H. and Caldwell, M. M. 1985. Soluble carbohydrates, concurrent photosynthesis and efficiency in regrowth following defoliation: a field study with Agropyron species. J. Appl. Ecol. 22: 907920.Google Scholar
30. Rose, C., Rose, R., Omi, S., Forry, K., Durall, D., and Bigg, W. 1991. Starch determination by perchloric acid vs. enzymes: Evaluating the accuracy and precision of six colorimetric methods. J. Agric. Food Chem. 39: 211.Google Scholar
31. Ross, M. A. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60: 7788.Google Scholar
32. SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT, Users Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina. Pages 548640.Google Scholar
33. Wilen, C. A., Holt, J. S., Ellstrand, N. C., and Shaw, R. G. 1995. Genotypic diversity of kikuyugrass (Pennisetum clandestinum) populations in California. Weed Sci. 43: 209214.Google Scholar
34. Youngner, V.B. 1972. Physiology of defoliation and regrowth. Pages 292303 in Youngner, V. B. and McKell, C. M., eds. The Biology and Utilization of Grasses. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
35. Youngner, V. B., Wright, W. W., and Zimmerman, E. 1971. Kikuyugrass—its management and control. Calif. Turfgrass Cult. 21: 13.Google Scholar