Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:02:50.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Siduron Effects on Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) Emergence, Growth, and High Temperature Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. C. Shearman
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
E. J. Kinbacher
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
K. A. Reierson
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Spring establishment of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb. ‘Kentucky 31’) is preferred over fall for turfs in Nebraska. Siduron [1-(2-methylcyclohexyl)-3-phenylurea] is commonly used for weed control in spring-seeded tall fescue. Siduron application rates of 6.8, 13.6, 27.2, and 40.8 kg/ha were compared with an untreated control in this study. All siduron applications reduced stand development. The 6.8 kg/ha rate nearly doubled the number of days for seedling emergence. Abnormal seedlings increased with increasing application rates and percent germination decreased with increasing rates. Tiller number declined at rates of 13.6 kg/ha and above. Plants treated with 6.8 kg/ha were 1.3 cm shorter than those growing in the untreated control. Plant and root dry matter production decreased with increasing application rates. Root weight was reduced more than plant weight. Degree of wilting and drought injury increased at 13.6 kg/ha. Water use declined with increased siduron application rates. The amount of water lost before wilting occurred also declined as siduron application rates increased. High temperature injury on seedlings was reduced with increasing rates of siduron. Reduction in high temperature injury was significantly correlated (r = 0.98) to reduced plant tissue moisture.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass: Science and Culture. Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 291 pp.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. 1969. A laboratory sprayer-flamer. Weed Sci. 17:102104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Dexter, S. T., Trottingham, W. E., and Graber, L. F. 1932. Investigations of hardiness of plants by measurement of electrical conductivity. Plant Physiol. 7:6378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Downs, W. G. and Duich, J. M. 1966. Pre- and postemergence effect of siduron on crabgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. pp. 519526.Google Scholar
5. Duich, J. M. and Perkins, A. T. 1967. Effect of preemergence chemicals on Poa annua and bentgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. pp. 484489.Google Scholar
6. Herbicide Handbook Weed Science Society of America. 1974. 3rd ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Champaign, Illinois. 356 pp.Google Scholar
7. Kerr, H. D. 1969. Selective grass control with siduron. Weed Sci. 17:181186.Google Scholar
8. Moshier, Loren, Turgeon, A. J., and Penner, Donald. 1976. Effects of glyphosate and siduron on turfgrass establishment. Weed Sci. 24:445448.Google Scholar
9. Shearman, R. C. and Beard, J. B. 1973. Environmental and cultural preconditioning effects on the water use rate of Agrostis palustris Huds., cultivar Penncross. Crop Sci. 13:424427.Google Scholar
10. Skogley, C. R. and Jagshitz, J. A. 1966. Chemical control of crabgrass and spotted spurge in turfgrass. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. pp. 531536.Google Scholar
11. Splittstoesser, W. E. and Hopen, H. J. 1967. Response of bentgrass to siduron. Weeds. 15:8283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Turgeon, A. J. and Meggitt, W. F. 1971. A small-plot sprayer. Weed Sci. 19:245247.Google Scholar