Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:57:09.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) Control in Soybean (Glycine max) Grown in Rotations of 97- and 18-cm Row Spacings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David R. Shaw ,
Clyde A. Smith  and
Charles E. Snipes
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Clyde A. Smith
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Charles E. Snipes
Affiliation:
Delta Branch, Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn., Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Various 3-yr rotation sequences of 97- and 18-cm row spacings, with appropriate sicklepod control treatments within each row spacing, were implemented to evaluate sicklepod population and soybean yield at two locations. Alachlor plus metribuzin applied preemergence followed by either a postemergence-directed spray of metribuzin plus 2,4-DB or hand hoeing in 97-cm rows consistently reduced sicklepod populations. Reductions with 97-cm rows and preemergence-applied herbicides coupled with cultivation were not as great. At one location, using a split application of metribuzin preplant incorporated followed by preemergence with 18-cm rows reduced sicklepod populations if effective control measures had been used in wide rows the previous year, but the narrow-row treatments did not reduce sicklepod numbers if 18-cm rows had been used previously. Soil-applied metribuzin was more effective under high soil pH conditions, and sicklepod populations were reduced substantially whether the previous row spacing was 18 or 97 cm. After the third year, all plots were planted in 97-cm rows with no herbicides. No differences were found among sicklepod populations with any previous row spacing or sicklepod control program, indicating that, even with 3 yr of effective control, subsequent sicklepod populations were not affected.

Keywords

Alachlor, 2-chloro-N-(2,6-diethylphenyl)-N-(methoxymethyl)acetamidemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidsicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia L. ♯3 CASOBsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Centennial’Hand hoedpopulation dynamicspostemergence-directed sprayweed freeweed management systemsalachlormetribuzin2,4-DBCASOB
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 37 , Issue 6 , November 1989 , pp. 748 - 752
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bridges, D. C. and Walker, R. H. 1985. Influence of weed management and cropping systems on sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) seed in soil. Weed Sci. 33:800–804.Google Scholar
2. Buchanan, G. A. and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacing on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 28: 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chitapong, P. 1984. Competition and control of jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) in narrow- and wide-row soybeans. Diss. Abstr. Int. 44: 3601.Google Scholar
4. Colvin, D. L., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M., and Walker, R. H. Weed management in minimum-tillage peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) as influenced by cultivar, row spacing, and herbicides. 1985. Weed Sci. 33:233–237.Google Scholar
5. Creel, J. M. Jr., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1968. Germination, growth, and ecology of sicklepod. Weed Sci. 16:396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1983. Longevity of seed after 5.5 years in the Stoneville 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 31:264–270.Google Scholar
7. Elmore, C. D. 1984. Weed survey of the southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:192–198.Google Scholar
8. Harper, J. L. 1957. Ecological aspects of weed control. Outlook Agric. 1: 197–205.Google Scholar
9. Jordan, J. H., Currey, W. L., and Teem, D. H. 1983. Influence of soybean planting dates and row spacing on sicklepod control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:417.Google Scholar
10. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of pH on metribuzin activity in the soil. Weed Sci. 24:505–507.Google Scholar
11. Legere, A. and Schreiber, M. M. 1984. Influence of row width and weed density on patterns of biomass allocation in soybean-pigweed stands. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:34–35.Google Scholar
12. McWhorter, C. G. and Sciumbato, G. L. 1988. Effects of row spacing, benomyl, and duration of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference on soybean (Glycine max) yields. Weed Sci. 36:254–259.Google Scholar
13. Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1978. Interaction of metribuzin and trifluralin with soil type on soybean (Glycine max) growth. Weed Sci. 26: 327–331.Google Scholar
14. Roberts, H. A. and Feast, P. M. 1972. Fate of seeds of some annual weeds in different depths of cultivated and undisturbed soil. Weed Res. 12:316–324.Google Scholar
15. Shaw, D. R. and Coats, G. E. 1988. Herbicides and cultivation for sicklepod, Cassia obtusifolia, control in soybeans, Glycine max . Weed Technol. 2:187–190.Google Scholar
16. Shaw, D. R., Snipes, C. E., and Whatley, L.L. 1986. Chemical control of sicklepod in soybeans. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. Vol. 11. No. 12.Google Scholar
17. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1980. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and coffee senna (Cassia occidentalism): geographic distribution, germination, and emergence. Weed Sci. 28:68–71.Google Scholar
18. Thurlow, D. L. and Buchanan, G. A. 1972. Competition of sicklepod with soybeans. Weed Sci. 20:379–384.Google Scholar
19. Walker, R. H., Patterson, M. G., Hauser, E., Isenhauer, D. J., Todd, J. W., and Buchanan, G. A. 1984. Effect of insecticide, weed-free period, and row spacing on soybean and sicklepod growth. Weed Sci. 32:702–706.Google Scholar
20. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effects of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.Google Scholar
21. Wax, L. M., Nave, W. R., and Cooper, R. L. 1977. Weed control in narrow- and wide-row soybeans. Weed Sci. 25:73–78.Google Scholar
22. Wiley, G. L., Williams, J. L. Jr., Bauman, T. T., and Weller, S. C. 1984. Velvetleaf competition in soybeans as influenced by row width. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:36–37.Google Scholar