Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T22:51:13.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selective Postemergence Herbicidal Control of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

B. A. Swisher  and
George Kapusta
B. A. Swisher
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sci. Dep., Southern Illinois Univ., Carbondale, IL 62901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two yr of field research were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of BAS-9021 {2-[1-(N-allyloxyamino)butylidene]-5,5-dimethyl-4-methoxycarbonylcyclohexane-1,3-dione, Na salt}, HOE 29152 {methyl 2-[4-(4-trifluoromethylphenoxy)phenoxy]propanoate}, and mefluidide N-[2,4-dimethyl-5-[[(trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl] amino] phenyl] acetamide as selective herbicides applied postemergence to johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.]. All three herbicides afforded 85% or greater control of rhizome johnsongrass in one experiment in 1977, where repeat applications were made and ideal growing conditions prevailed. HOE 29152 also afforded excellent control with a single application made at the boot stage of johnsongrass. In a second experiment in 1977, when drought conditions prevailed, HOE 29152 was the only herbicide that afforded 70% or greater control of the johnsongrass. Both BAS-9021 and mefluidide afforded less than 60% control of johnsongrass in the single 1978 experiment, when evaluated at the end of the season. This study also was subject to drought conditions throughout the growing season.

Keywords

BAS-9021HOE 29152mefluididerhizome johnsongrass
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , September 1980 , pp. 529 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1973. Absorption and translocation of herbicides. Pages 34–44 in Mode of Action of Herbicides. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
2. Crafts, A. S. 1956. Weed control: applied botany. Am. J. Bot. 43:548–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Gates, C. E. and Bilbro, J. D. 1978. Illustration of a cluster analysis method for mean separation. Agron. J. 70:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hamilton, K. C. 1969. Repeated, foliar applications of herbicides on johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 17:245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hamilton, K. C. and Tucker, H. 1964. Response of selected and random plantings of johnsongrass to dalapon. Weeds 12:220–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Holm, G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Sorghum halepense . Pages 54–61 in The World's Worst Weeds. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu.Google Scholar
7. McWhorter, C. G. 1971. Control of johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 19:229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G. 1977. Weed control in soybeans with glyphosate applied in the recirculating sprayer. Weed Sci. 25:135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. and Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting the translocation of 14C-mefluidide in soybeans, common cocklebur, and johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 26:382–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D., Packolak, E., Tiu, Lu-Chyuan, and Miller, S. D. 1976. BAS-9021 and HOE 29152 for grass weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:137–140.Google Scholar
11. Parochetti, J. V., Wilson, H. P., and Burt, G. W. 1975. Activity of glyphosate on johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 23:395–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Wyse, D. C. 1976. Quackgrass control in field crops. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 31:152–154.Google Scholar