Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:58:10.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal variation of picloram metabolism in broom (Gutierrezia sarothrae) and threadleaf (Gutierrezia microcephala) snakeweed populations in a common garden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Larissa A. Gibbs
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Weed Science, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003

Abstract

Broom and threadleaf snakeweed are major rangeland weeds in the western United States, and picloram is the major herbicide used for their management. Previous work has shown that these species are most susceptible to picloram applied in autumn or when precipitation is high and that differences in herbicide absorption and tissue sensitivity as measured by picloram-induced ethylene production do not fully explain variation in seasonal response. Therefore, the role of picloram metabolism in seasonal susceptibility to picloram was examined. Because snakeweed is characterized as highly genetically variable, picloram metabolism was evaluated monthly for 3 yr among populations from two species as well. Picloram metabolism was examined monthly for 3 yr among two populations of threadleaf and nine populations of broom snakeweed grown in a common garden. Metabolism ranged from 30 to 70% of picloram applied, and picloram was converted to two metabolites more polar than picloram regardless of species or population. Although metabolism was greatest in the year with the most precipitation, rate of metabolism was unrelated to precipitation received in the 7-d period before treatment. Application timing as defined by a given month or specific phenological stage was not related to the level of metabolism. We conclude that variation in picloram metabolism is not involved in differential susceptibility across season or population.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Chaleff, R. S. 1980. Further characterization of picloram-tolerant mutants of Nicotiana tabacum . Theor. Appl. Genet 58:9195.Google Scholar
Chkanikov, D. I., Makeev, A. M., Pavlova, N. N., and Nazarova, T. A. 1983. Formation of picloram N-glucoside in plants. Soviet Plant Physiol 30:7074.Google Scholar
Chkanikov, D. I., Pavlova, N. N., Makeev, A. M., and Nazarova, T. A. 1984. Conjugates of picloram and 2,4-D with mustard oils in plants of the family Cruciferae . Soviet Plant Physiol 31:257262.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Physiology of Herbicide Action. Edgewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 441 p.Google Scholar
Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Mansager, E. R. 1989. Picloram metabolism in leafy spurge: isolation and identification of glucose and gentiobiose conjugates. J. Agric. Food Chem 37:14081412.Google Scholar
Gesink, R. W., Alley, H. P., and Lee, G. A. 1973. Vegetative response to chemical control of broom snakeweed on a blue grama range. J. Range Manage 26:139143.Google Scholar
Hall, J. C. and VandenBorn, W. H. 1988. The absence of a role of absorption, translocation, or metabolism in the selectivity of picloram and clopyralid in two plant species. Weed Sci 36:914.Google Scholar
Hallmen, U. 1974. Translocation and complex formation of picloram and 2,4-D in rape and sunflower. Physiol. Plant 32:7883.Google Scholar
Hou, Y. and Sterling, T. M. 1995. Isozyme variation in broom snakeweek (Gutierrezia sarothrae). Weed Sci 42:156162.Google Scholar
Kudaikina, I. V., Makeev, A. M., and Chkanikov, D. I. 1981. Picloram metabolism in certain plants. Fiziol. Biokhim. Kul't. Rast 13/3:306309.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1991. Correlation of environment and root carbohydrate content to picloram translocation in leafy spurge. J. Range Manage 44:254258.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. C. and Duncan, K. W. 1987. Control with picloram and metsulfuron. Weed Sci 35:837841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, K. C. and Sosebee, R. E. 1988. Ecology management and poisonous properties associated with perennial snakeweeds. Pages 4356 in James, L. F., Ralphs, M. H., and Nielson, D. B. eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K. C., Wood, B. L., and Murray, L. 2002. Broom snakeweed control and seed damage after herbicide applications. J. Range Manage 55:604611.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. J. F. and Stephenson, G. R. 1973. The selective action of picloram in red maple and white ash. Weed Res 13:169178.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1991. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6, 4th ed, Volume 2. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 943 p.Google Scholar
Schmutz, E. M. and Little, D. E. 1970. Effects of 2,4,5-T and picloram on broom snakeweed in Arizona. J. Range Manage 23:354357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M. P. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1973. Uptake, cellular distribution, and metabolism of 14C-picloram by excised plant tissues. Physiol. Plant 29:1016.Google Scholar
Solbrig, O. T. 1960. Cytotaxonomic and evolutionary studies in the North American species of Gutierrezia (Compositae). Contrib. Gray Herb 188:161.Google Scholar
Sosobee, R. E. 1985. Timing—The Key to Herbicidal Control of Broom Snakeweed. Texas Tech Management Note 6. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Hou, Y. 1997. Genetic diversity of broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) and threadleaf snakeweed (G. microcephala) populations. Weed Sci 45:674680.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Jochem, H. S. 1995. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism of picloram and metsulfuron methyl by two locoweed species. Weed Sci 43:1317.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M. and Lownds, N. K. 1992. Picloram absorption by broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) leaf tissue. Weed Sci 40:390394.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M., Lownds, N. K., and Murray, L. W. 1996. Environmental effects on picloram uptake and ethylene production by broom snakeweed. J. Range Manage 49:245250.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M., Murray, L. W., and Hou, Y. 2000. Morphological variation among Gutierrezia sarothrae populations. Weed Sci 48:356365.Google Scholar
Sterling, T. M., Thompson, D. C., and McDaniel, K. C. 1999. Perennial snakeweeds. Pages 323335 in Sheley, R. L. and Petroff, J. K. eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Torell, L. A., Gordon, H. W., McDaniel, K. C., and McGinty, A. 1988. Economic impacts of perennial snakeweed infestations. Pages 5769 in James, L. F., Ralphs, M. H., and Nielson, D. B. eds. The Ecology and Economic Impact of Poisonous Plants on Livestock Production. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar