Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:47:33.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scale dependent relationships between native plant diversity and the invasion of croftonweed (Eupatorium adenophorum) in southwest China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Zhijun Lu  and
Keping Ma
Zhijun Lu
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Quantitative Vegetation Ecology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincun, Xiangshan, Haidian District, Beijing 100093, China; Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19 Yuquanlu (Jia), Shijingshan District, Beijing 100039, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Croftonweed is an invasive plant in southwest China. We examined the relationships between its invasion patterns and native plant diversity at different spatio-temporal scales. At the 25 m2 scale, invasion success was negatively correlated with native plant diversity, indicating that resource availability might be the dominant factor regulating community invasibility. At the 400-m2 scale, both negative and positive relationships were detected, possibly identifying a spatial scale threshold where extrinsic environmental factors became more important to community invasibility. At the vegetation province scale, variations in physical environment outweighed the importance of intrinsic biotic factors and positive relationships between diversity and invader success were found. Native plant diversity also inhibited croftonweed over the course of community succession and at the early stages of invasion at local spatial scales. However, the changing relationship might be an artifact of sampling at different spatial scales.

Keywords

Croftonweed, Eupatorium adenophorum Sprengel EUPADBiodiversitybiological invasionscommunity successioninvasive speciesspatio-temporal scale
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 53 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 600 - 604
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Auld, B. A. 1969. The distribution of E. adenophorum Spreng. on the Far North Coast of New South Wales. J. Proc. Royal Soc. New South Wales 102:159–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, B. A. 1970. Eupatorium weed species in Australia. Pest Articles and News Summaries 16:82–86.Google Scholar
Auld, B. A. and Martin, P. M. 1975. The autecology of E. adenophorum Spreng. in Australia. Weed Res 15:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, T. J. 1990. Invasion resistance arises in strongly interacting species-rich model competition communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 87:9610–9614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, J. S. 2001. Biodiversity and invasibility in grassland microcosms. Oecologia 126:563–568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London, Great: Britain: Methuen. 181 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, B. L., Smith, V. H., Dickson, T. L., and Hildebrand, T. 2002. Invasibility and compositional stability in a grassland community: relationships to diversity and extrinsic factors. Oikos 99:300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelbard, J. L. and Belnap, J. 2003. Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv. Biol 17:420–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hector, A., Dobson, K., Minns, A., Bazeley-White, E., and Lawton, J. H. 2001. Community diversity and invasion resistance: an experimental test in a grassland ecosystem and a review of comparable studies. Ecol. Res 16:819–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. 1989. The nature and effect of disturbance relative to invasions. Pages 389–540 in Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmánek, M., and Williamson, M. eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, Great Britain: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Chapin, F. S. III, and Ewel, J. J. et al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr 75:3–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsone, I. M. 1986. Plant invasion windows: a time-based classification of invasion potential. Biol. Rev 61:369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, T. A., Naeem, S., Howe, K. M., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., and Relch, P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417:636–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., and Haddad, N. M. et al. 1999. Effects of plant species richness on invasion dynamics, disease outbreaks, insect abundances and diversity. Ecol. Lett 2:286–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, R. and Morton, R. D. 1996. Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77:762–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J. 2000. Plant diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, J. and D'Antonio, C. M. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invasibility. Oikos 87:15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B. 1993. General Ecology. Huhhot, China: Inner Mongolia University Press. 107 p.Google Scholar
Liu, L. H., Xie, S. C., and Zhang, J. H. 1985. Studies on the distribution, damage and control of E. adenophorum Spreng. Acta Ecol. Sinica 5:1–11.Google Scholar
McGrady-Steed, J., Harris, P. M., and Morin, P. J. 1997. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem reliability. Nature 390:162–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Microcal software, Inc. 1999. Origin. Version 6.0. Northampton, MA: Microcal Software.Google Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A. 1989. Biological invasions: a SCOPE program overview. Pages 491–506 in Drake, J. A., Mooney, H. A., di Castri, F., Groves, R. H., Kruger, F. J., Rejmánek, M., and Williamson, M. eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, Great Britain: J. Wiley.Google Scholar
Naeem, S., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., Howe, K. M., Kennedy, T., and Gale, S. 2000. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papes, M. and Peterson, A. T. 2003. Predicting the potential invasive distribution for E. adenophorum Spreng. in China. J. Wuhan Bot. Res 21:137–142.Google Scholar
Parendes, L. A. and Jones, J. A. 2000. Role of light availability and dispersal in exotic plant invasion along roads and streams in the H. J. Andrews Experimental Forest, Oregon. Conserv. Biol 14:64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planty-Tabacchi, A. M., Tabacchi, E., Naiman, R. J., Deferrari, C., and Decamps, H. 1996. Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones. Conserv. Biol 10:598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiang, S. 1998. The history and status of the study on croftonweed (E. adenophorum Spreng.) a worst worldwide weed. J. Wuhan Bot. Res 16:366–372.Google Scholar
Shea, K. and Chesson, P. 2002. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol 17:170–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohlgren, T. J., Binkley, D., and Chong, G. W. et al. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol. Monogr 69:25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symstad, A. J. 2000. A test of the effects of functional group richness and composition on grassland invasibility. Ecology 81:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1997. Community invasibility, recruitment limitation, and grassland biodiversity. Ecology 78:81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80:1455–1474.Google Scholar
Wang, F., Summerell, B. A., Marshall, D. R., and Auld, B. A. 1997. Inoculum production of Phaeoramularia, a potential mycoherbicide for croftonweed. Aust. Plant Pathol 26:173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. J., He, P., and Ma, J. L. 1994. An investigation and research report on the dissemination of A. adenophora on rangeland areas in Liangshan District of Sichuan Province. Grassl. China 87(1):62–64.Google Scholar
Wiser, S. K., Allen, R. B., Clinton, P. W., and Platt, K. H. 1998. Community structure and forest invasion by an exotic herb over 23 years. Ecology 79:2071–2081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, R. R., Zhang, D. Y., and Lu, X. S. 1984. On the distribution, perniciousness and control of the two weeds, Chromolaena coelestina and C. odorata in Yunnan Province of China. Grassl. China 77(2):17–22.Google Scholar
Wu, Z. Y. 1995. Vegetation of China. Beijing: Science Press. 1375 p.Google Scholar
Xue, J. R., Dong, S. R., Yin, J. H., and Hong, S. D. 1979. E. coelestium L.: its adaptability, damage and control. Acta Botanica Yunnaica 1:106–114.Google Scholar
Zhao, G. J. and Ma, Y. P. 1989. Investigation and study on the distribution and damage of E. adenophorum in Yunnan Province. J. Weed Sci 3:37–40.Google Scholar