Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:29:32.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of Ipomoea spp. and Smallflower Morningglory (Jacquemontia tamnifolia) to Temperature and Osmotic Stresses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. H. Crowley
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas located at the Southeast Res. and Ext. Center, Monticello, AR 71655
G. A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ., Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn, AL 36830

Abstract

Seed germination responses to temperature and osmotic stress were determined for smallflower morningglory [Jacquemontia tamnifolia (L.) Griseb.] and seven species of Ipomoea. Cypressvine (I. quamoclit L.), willowleaf (I. wrightii Gray) and smallflower morningglory germinated and seedlings developed more slowly than the other morningglories at 16 C. Maximum germination of ivyleaf [I. hederacea (L.), Jacq. var. hederacea], entireleaf [I. hederacea (L.) Jacq. var. integriuscula Gray], pitted (I. lacunosa L.), tall [I. purpurea (L.) Roth], cotton (I. trichocarpa Ell.), and smallflower morningglories occurred in 24 h at 20 C. Cypressvine and willowleaf morningglories reached maximum germination in 24 h at 24 C. Optimal root-hypocotyl development occurred at 24 C for pitted, tall, and willowleaf morningglories, while all other species required a temperature of 28 C for maximal root-hypocotyl development in 4 days. Increasing osmotic pressure decreased or delayed germination of all morningglory species. Species tolerance to osmotic stress during germination could be ranked, most to least tolerant, as follows: ivyleaf=entireleaf>pitted=cotton>tall = willowleaf>cypressvine=smallflower. Maximum germination was delayed approximately 24 h for each 2 bar increment increase in osmotic pressure.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cole, A. W. and Coats, G. E. 1973. Tall morningglory germination response to herbicides and temperature. Weed Sci. 21:443446.Google Scholar
2. Czabator, F. J. 1962. Germination value: An index combining speed and completeness of pine seed germination. For. Sci. 8:386396.Google Scholar
3. Frazee, R. W. and Stoller, E. W. 1974. Differential growth of corn, soybean and seven dicotyledonous weed seedlings. Weed Sci. 22:336339.Google Scholar
4. Hoveland, C. S. and Buchanan, G. A. 1973. Weed seed germination under simulated drought. Weed Sci. 21:322324.Google Scholar
5. Hunter, J. R. and Erickson, A. E. 1952. Relation of seed germination to soil moisture tension. Agron. J. 44:107109.Google Scholar
6. Jarvis, P. G. and Jarvis, M. S. 1963. Effect of several osmotic substrates on the growth of Lupinus albus seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 16:485500.Google Scholar
7. Mayer, A. M. and Poljakoff-Mayber, A. 1963. The germination of seeds. The MacMillan Company, New York. 236 pp.Google Scholar
8. Parmar, M. T. and Moore, R. P. 1966. Effects of simulated drought by polyethylene glycol solutions on corn (Zea mays L.) germination and seedling development. Agron. J. 58:391392.Google Scholar
9. Pollock, B. M. 1972. Effects of environment after sowing on viability. Pages 150171 in Roberts, E. H., ed. Viability of seeds. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
10. Raynal, D. J. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1973. Establishment of early successional plant populations on forest and prairie soil. Ecology 54: 13351341.Google Scholar
11. Teem, D. H., Hoveland, C. S., and Buchanan, G. A. 1974. Primary root elongation of three weed species. Weed Sci. 22:4750.Google Scholar
12. Wiese, A. F. and Davis, R. G. 1967. Weed emergence from two soils at various moistures, temperatures, and depths. Weeds 15:118121.Google Scholar
13. Wiggans, S. C. and Gardner, F. P. 1959. Effectiveness of various solutions for simulating drought conditions as measured by germination and seedling growth. Agron. J. 51:315338.Google Scholar
14. Young, J. A., Evans, R. A., Gifford, R. O., and Eckert, R. E. Jr. 1968. Germination of Medusahead in response to osmotic stress. Weed Sci. 16:364368.Google Scholar
15. Young, J. A. and Evans, R. A. 1977. Moisture stress and weed seed germination experimental approaches. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:83.Google Scholar