Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:26:14.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Wild Oat (Avena fatua), Flax (Linum usitatissimum), and Rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) to Diclofop-methyl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. N. P. Chow
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Brandon, Manitoba R7A 5Z7 and Morden, Manitoba R0G 1J0, Canada
D. G. Dorrell
Affiliation:
Agriculture Canada, Brandon, Manitoba R7A 5Z7 and Morden, Manitoba R0G 1J0, Canada

Abstract

Diclofop-methyl {methyl ester of 2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoic acid} applied as postemergence treatment at rates of 0.84 to 1.68 kg/ha controlled 65 to 87% of the wild oat (Avena fatua L.) without injuring flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) or rapeseed (Brassica campestris L. and B. napus L.) Yields of both crops were significantly increased because wild oat competition was minimized. Wild oat control was further improved when adjuvants were added with the herbicide at a concentration of 0.5% (v/v) to the spray mixture. Oil content, iodine number, and linolenic acid concentration of flax, and oil content of rapeseed were increased with the application of the herbicide, while the protein content of meal from both crops was unaffected. When flax was grown in the greenhouse under weed-free conditions, the 0.84 and 1.12 kg/ha rates of the herbicide did not affect seed and oil composition, whereas the 1.68 kg/ha rate decreased protein content, and slightly increased oil content, but had no significant effect on iodine number when compared with the untreated check. The change in seed and oil quality of flax appears to be related to a reduction in weed competition by the herbicide.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oats in flax. Weed Sci. 16:501504.Google Scholar
2. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bowren, K. E. 1974. Date of removal of wild oats from rapeseed. Res. Rep., Can. Weed Comm. (West. Sec.), p. 484485.Google Scholar
4. Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinney, R. L. 1977. Control of Italian ryegrass and wild oats in winter wheat with HOE 23408. Agron. J. 69:911913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Chow, P. N. P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Dew, D. A. and Keys, C. H. 1976. An index of competition for estimating loss of rape due to wild oats. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:10051006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Dorrell, D. G. 1973. Effects of unusual field weathering on the quality of flaxseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:907910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Friesen, H. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. HOE 23408, a new selective herbicide for wild oats and green foxtail in wheat and barley. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:567578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Keys, C. H. 1974. Effect of wild oat competition (time of removal) on rapeseed reproduction. Res. Rep., Can. Weed Comm. (West. Sec.), p. 490.Google Scholar
10. Miller, S. D. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1974. HOE 23408 for postemergence wild oat and foxtail control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 29:3839.Google Scholar
11. Wu, C. H. and Santelmann, P. W. 1976. Phytotoxicity and soil activity of HOE 23408. Weed Sci. 24:601604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar