Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:23:02.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Seedlings of Three Perennial Grasses to Dalapon, Amitrole, and Glyphosate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard D. Comes
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
Louis Y. Marquis
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
Allen D. Kelley
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350

Abstract

Differential tolerances to dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid), amitrole (3-amino-s-triazole) plus ammonium thiocyanate, and glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] of 3- to 10-week-old seedlings of creeping red fescue (Festuca rubra L. ‘Boreal’) and redtop (Agrostis alba L.), which are desirable ditchbank grasses, and reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundianacea L.), a troublesome ditchbank weed, were evaluated in the field. Within each of four treatment dates (growth stages), dalapon affected all species similarly; effects among treatment dates ranged from none to severe. Amitrole at 4.5 kg/ha plus ammonium thiocyanate at 4.1 kg/ha reduced the stand of 3-week-old seedlings of redtop, creeping red fescue, and reed canarygrass by 0, 42, and 94%, respectively, but had little effect on older seedlings. Glyphosate at 1.1 kg/ha did not significantly reduce the stand of 5- to 10-week-old creeping red fescue seedlings, but killed nearly all reed canarygrass seedlings. Redtop was intermediate in its tolerance to glyphosate. Applications of amitrole plus ammonium thiocyanate or glyphosate should be effective in converting ditchbank vegetation from an undesirable stand of reed canarygrass to a desirable stand of redtop and creeping red fescue, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, S. W., Segura, J., and Foy, C. L. 1980. Susceptibility of several grasses to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 28:579585.Google Scholar
2. Bruns, V. F. 1973. Studies on the control of reed canarygrass along irrigation systems. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. publication ARS-W-3. 17 pp.Google Scholar
3. Comes, R. D. 1974. Control of reed canarygrass on ditchbanks with glyphosate. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 116.Google Scholar
4. Fisher, R. and Faulkner, J. S. 1975. The tolerance of twelve grass species to a range of foliar-absorbed and root-absorbed grass-killing herbicides. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. pp. 204215.Google Scholar
5. Hodgson, J. M. 1968. Chemical control of reed canarygrass on irrigation canals. Weeds 16:465468.Google Scholar
6. Marquis, L. Y., Comes, R. D., and Yang, C. P. 1979. Selectivity of glyphosate in creeping red fescue and reed canarygrass. Weed Res. 19:335342.Google Scholar