Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:33:45.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing Herbicide Injury to Sorghum with Crop Protectants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. F. Spotanski  and
O. C. Burnside
R. F. Spotanski
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68503
O. C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron., University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68503
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field studies were used to evaluate crop protectants with herbicides in order to obtain selective, broad-spectrum weed control in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench ‘RS 626’]. Of the herbicides evaluated alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl) acetanilide] was the only one causing sorghum injury that could be moderated with crop protectants. The crop protectant anhydride (1,8-napthalic anhydride) was most effective in reducing alachlor injury when applied as a seed treatment at 0.5% (w/w). Storage of anhydride-treated seed for 1 year did not increase anhydride damage to sorghum seedlings. Preplant applications of alachlor, incorporated into the soil, caused four times more injury to sorghum than did the same rate applied preemergence. Combinations of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] and alachlor did not increase sorghum injury or alter the effects of the crop protectants. In the field, anhydride was the most effective crop protectant used. Crop protectant R-28725 (2,2-dimethyl-3-dichloroacetyloxazolidine) at 0.5% w/w to sorghum seed and at 0.6 kg/ha as a tank mix was effective in reducing sorghum injury at the lower alachlor rates. Crop protectant R-25788 (N,N-diallyl-2,2-dichloroacetamide) was the least effective of those studied; however, seed treatment at 0.5% w/w was more effective than the tank mixes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , November 1973 , pp. 531 - 536
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ahrens, J. F. 1965. Improving herbicide selectivity in horticulture crops with activated carbon. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 19:366–367.Google Scholar
2. Ahrens, J. F. 1967. Improving herbicide selectivity in transplanted crops with root dips of activated charcoal. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:64.Google Scholar
3. Arnold, W. E. and O'Neal, W. B. 1971. Evaluations of herbicides in corn. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 28:126–129.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W. and Miller, F. R. 1969. Effect of activated carbon on the phytotoxicity of herbicides in a tropical soil. Weed Sci. 17:189–192.Google Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., Fenster, C. R., Moomaw, R. S., and Robison, L. R. 1969. Chemical control of weeds in grain sorghum across Nebraska. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 24:21–25.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1971. Protecting corn from herbicide injury by seed treatment. Weed Sci. 19:565–568.Google Scholar
7. Coffey, D. L. and Warren, G. F. 1969. Inactivation of herbicides by activated carbon and other adsorbants. Weed Sci. 17:16–19.Google Scholar
8. Harvey, R. G. 1971. Herbicide performance in corn. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 28:137–140.Google Scholar
9. Kapusta, G. 1970. Naphthalic anhydride antidote for EPTC on corn. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 27:79.Google Scholar
10. Knake, E. L. 1971. Evaluation of preplant and preemergence herbicides for sorghum. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rep. 28:151.Google Scholar
11. Linscott, D. L. and Hagin, R. D. 1967. Protecting alfalfa seedlings from a triazine with activated charcoal. Weeds 15:304–306.Google Scholar
12. McGlamery, M. D. and Slife, F. W. 1970. Naphthalic anhydride seed treatment. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Res. Rep. 27:82.Google Scholar
13. Niccum, D. E. 1970. Variations in inbred and varietal tolerance of corn to butylate, alachlor, and propachlor. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 25:33–35.Google Scholar
14. Phillips, W. M. 1970. Weed control methods, losses and costs due to weeds, and benefits of weed control in grain sorghum. Pages 101–108. in FAO International Conference on Weed Control. Weed Science Society of America, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar