Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:55:01.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reduced rates of sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron and glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant Glycine max

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeremy T. Dirks ,
William G. Johnson ,
Reid J. Smeda ,
William J. Wiebold  and
Raymond E. Massey
Jeremy T. Dirks
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Reid J. Smeda
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
William J. Wiebold
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Raymond E. Massey
Affiliation:
Department of Ag Economics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 to evaluate crop response, weed control, Glycine max yield, and economic returns of labeled (1×) and one-half labeled (½×) rates of early preplant (EPP) sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron and postemergence glyphosate, compared to glyphosate-alone systems in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant G. max. Treatments containing a 1× or ½× rate of EPP sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron with glyphosate followed by (fb) a postemergence treatment of glyphosate provided 80 to 100% control of Xanthium strumarium, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, and Polygonum pensylvanicum and 82 to 100% control of Setaria faberi and Amaranthus rudis if glyphosate was applied mid-postemergence (MPOST) or late postemergence (LPOST). Glyphosate alone EPP fb glyphosate postemergence or sequential postemergence treatments of glyphosate provided 77 to 100% control of S. faberi, A. artemisiifolia, and P. pensylvanicum. Glycine max yield did not significantly differ between treatments that contained 1× or ½× rates of sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron EPP with postemergence glyphosate or sequential glyphosate. Residual herbicides fb glyphosate reduced overall weed control variability but did not reduce the overall yield variability compared to glyphosate alone. Greater weed control, G. max yield, net incomes, and lower coefficient of variation (CV) of net incomes were generally associated with treatments that included both EPP and postemergence treatments vs. single herbicide applications. A greenhouse study was conducted to determine the optimal spray additive to maximize the foliar activity of sulfentrazone on three annual weeds. Sulfentrazone alone and in combination with a nonionic surfactant (NIS), methylated seed oil (MSO), crop oil concentrate (COC), and a silicone-based surfactant (SBS), with and without ammonium sulfate (AMS), were applied on two sizes of Abutilon theophrasti, P. pensylvanicum, and S. faberi. AMS provided little additional efficacy of sulfentrazone on S. faberi, but improved efficacy on A. theophrasti and P. pensylvanicum. SBS or MSO plus AMS with sulfentrazone generally provided the greatest efficacy on all species.

Keywords

ChlorimuronglyphosatesulfentrazoneXanthium strumarium L. XANST, common cockleburAmbrosia artemisiifolia L. AMBEL, common ragweedAmaranthus rudis AMATA, common waterhempSetaria faberi Herrm. SETFA, giant foxtailPolygonum pensylvanicum L. POLPY, Pennsylvania smartweedAbutilon theophrasti (L.) Medik. ABUTH, velvetleafGlycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 3601’, soybeanSoybean yieldeconomic returns
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 48 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 618 - 627
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Buhler, D. D. 1985. Early pre-plant and split herbicide applications for weed control in no-till and reduced tillage corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 49:48.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced rates of bentazon and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CTIC] Conservation Tillage Information Center. 1998. CTIC Tillage Survey. National Crop Residue Management Survey Executive Summary. Lafayette, IN: CTIC. 22 p.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Green, H. M., Weete, J. D., and Hancock, H. G. 1996. Postemergence activity of sulfentrazone: effects of surfactants and leaf surfaces. Weed Sci. 44:797–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Duke, S. O., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:634–641.Google Scholar
DeFelice, M. S., Brown, W. B., Aldrich, R. J., Sims, B. D., Judy, D. T., and Guethle, D. R. 1989. Weed control in soybeans (Glycine max) with below-label rates of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 37:365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddux, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:834–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duke, S. O., Dayan, R. E., Yamamoto, M., Duke, M. V., and Reddy, K. N. 1996. Protoporphyringen oxidase inhibitors—their current and future role. Proc. 2nd Int. Weed Control Congr. 3:775–780.Google Scholar
Gonzini, L. C., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Herbicide combinations for weed management in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, J. M. 1991. Maximizing herbicide efficiency with mixtures and expert systems. Weed Technol. 5:894–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gronwald, J. W., Jourdan, S. W., Wyse, D. L., Somers, D. A., and Magnusson, M. U. 1993. Effect of ammonium sulfate on absorption of imazethapyr by quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) and maize (Zea mays) cell suspension cultures. Weed Sci. 41:325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, H. G. 1992. Weed spectrum of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:49.Google Scholar
Hancock, H. G. 1994. Post-emergent activity of F6285 in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:63.Google Scholar
Harr, J. R., Guggenheim, G., Schulke, G., Falk, R. H. 1991. The Leaf Surface of Major Weeds. Richmond, CA: Sandoz Agro. 190 p.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Dilbeck, J. S., DeFelice, M. S., and Kendig, J. A. 1998a. Weed control with reduced rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin and imazethapyr in no-till, narrow-row soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Dilbeck, J. S., DeFelice, M. S., and Kendig, J. A. 1998b. Weed control with reduced rates of imazaquin and imazethapyr in notill, narrow-row soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 46:105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Massey, R. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Becker, C. D. 1997. Weed control and economic returns with postemergence herbicides in narrow-row soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 11:453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muyonga, C. M., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1996. Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 44:148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. G., ed. 1994. Combined analysis of several experiments. Pages 205–260 in Agricultural Field Experiments, Design and Analysis, Marcel Dekker: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prostko, E. P. and Meade, J. A. 1993. Reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in conventional soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 7:365–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggenbuck, F. C., Penner, D., Burow, R. R., and Thomas, B. 1993. Study of the enhancement of herbicide activity and rainfastness by an organosilicone adjuvant using radiolabeled herbicide and adjuvant. Pestic. Sci. 37:121–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, R., Shaw, D. R., and Barrentine, W. L. 1998. Glyphosate tank mixtures with SAN582 for burndown or postemergence applications in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:23–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. M. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1992. Ammonium sulfate increases efficacy of sethoxydim through increased absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 40:351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. L., Mohan, R. G., and Kollman, G. E. 1985. Enhanced velvetleaf activity with 10-34-0 in acifluorfen-sodium and combinations. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:70–72.Google Scholar
Steckel, L. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1990. Integrating reduced rates of postemergence herbicides and cultivation for broadleaf weed control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:541–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1999. Missouri Farm Facts 1999. Columbia, MO: Missouri Agricultural Statistics Service. 92 p.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Jordan, D. L., and Girlinghouse, J. M. 1994. Efficacy of F6285 in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:62.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with reduced rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosateresistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:478–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. H. 1994. F6285 applied postemergence in soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:64.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–232.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci. 37:400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar