Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:57:06.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Picloram and Aminopyralid Sorption to Soil and Clay Minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brandon J. Fast ,
Jason A. Ferrell ,
Gregory E. MacDonald ,
L. Jason Krutz  and
William N. Kline
Brandon J. Fast*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Jason A. Ferrell
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Gregory E. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
L. Jason Krutz
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
William N. Kline
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, Duluth, GA 30096
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research was conducted to determine picloram and aminopyralid sorption in five soils and three clay minerals and to determine if the potential for off-target movement of aminopyralid in soil is less than that of picloram. Nearly all sorption of picloram and aminopyralid occurred between 0 and 8 h, and the maximum theoretical sorption of picloram and aminopyralid were 10.3 and 15.2%, respectively. Freundlich distribution coefficients (K f) for picloram ranged from 0.12 in a Cecil sandy loam to 0.81 in an Arredondo fine sand, while K f values for aminopyralid ranged from 0.35 in a Cecil sandy loam to 0.96 in an Arredondo fine sand. Furthermore, K f values of aminopyralid were higher than those of picloram in all soils tested. K f values of picloram in clay minerals were 0.25 (kaolinite), 1.17 (bentonite), and 1,016.4 (montmorillonite), and those of aminopyralid were 5.63 (kaolinite), 2.29 (bentonite), and 608.90 (montmorillonite). It was concluded that soil sorption of aminopyralid was greater than that of picloram and that the potential for off-target movement of aminopyralid is less than that of picloram.

Keywords

AminopyralidpicloramFreundlich distribution coefficientherbicide adsorptionherbicide leachingherbicide sorption kinetics
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 484 - 489
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2008. Milestone® herbicide product label. Dow AgroSciences Publication No. D02-879-002. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 9 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2009. Tordon® 22K herbicide product label. Dow AgroSciences Publication No. D02-111-013. Indianapolis, IN Dow AgroSciences. 14 p.Google Scholar
ArgusLab 2004. ArgusLab Version 4.0.1. Seattle, WA Planaria Software LLC.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. S. and Farmer, W. J. 1979. Exchangeable cations and picloram sorption by soil and model adsorbents. Weed Sci. 27:257–262.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. W., White, J. L., and Rothberg, I. 1968. Adsorption of organic herbicides by montmorillonite: role of pH and chemical character of adsorbate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32:222–234.Google Scholar
Baur, J. R., Baker, R. D., Bovey, R. W., and Smith, J. D. 1972. Concentration of picloram in the soil profile. Weed Sci. 20:305–309.Google Scholar
Biggar, J. W. and Cheung, M. W. 1973. Adsorption of picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) on Panoche, Ephrata, and Palouse soils: a thermodynamic approach to the adsorption mechanism. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37:863–868.Google Scholar
Biggar, J. W., Mingelgrin, U., and Cheung, M. W. 1978. Equilibrium and kinetics of adsorption of picloram and parathion with soils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:1306–1312.Google Scholar
Cox, L., Koskinen, W. C., Celis, R., Yen, P. Y., Hermosin, M. C., and Cornejo, J. 1998. Sorption of imidacloprid on soil clay mineral and organic components. Soil Sci. Am. J. 62:911–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSutter, T. M., Clay, S. A., and Clay, D. E. 2003. Atrazine sorption and desorption as affected by aggregate size, particle size, and soil type. Weed Sci. 51:456–462.Google Scholar
Farmer, W. J. and Aochi, Y. 1974. Picloram sorption by soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38:418–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrell, J. A., Vencill, W. K., Xia, K., and Grey, T. L. 2005. Sorption and desorption of flumioxazin to soil, clay minerals, and ion-exchange resin. Pest Manag. Sci. 61:4046.Google Scholar
Fushiwaki, Y. and Urano, K. 2001. Adsorption of pesticides and their biodegraded products on clay minerals and soils. J. Health Sci. 47:429–432.Google Scholar
Gan, J., Weimer, M. R., Koskinen, W. C., Buhler, D. D., Wyse, D. L., and Becker, R. L. 1994. Sorption and desorption of imazethapyr and 5-hydroxyimazethapyr in Minnesota soils. Weed Sci. 42:92–97.Google Scholar
Gantz, R. L. and Laning, E. R. 1963. Tordon for the control of woody rangeland species in the western United States. Down to Earth. 19 (3):10–13.Google Scholar
Green, R. E. and Karickhoff, S. W. 1990. Sorption estimates for modeling. Pages 79–102. In Cheng, H. H. ed. Pesticides in the Soil Environment: Processes, Impacts, and Modeling. Madison, WI Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., Adams, J. Jr., Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Hancock, H. G., and Kwon, O. 2000. Behavior of sulfentrazone in ionic exchange resins, electrophoresis gels, and cation-saturated soils. Weed Sci. 48:239–247.Google Scholar
Grover, R. 1971. Adsorption of picloram by soil colloids and various other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 19:417–418.Google Scholar
Hamaker, J. W., Goring, C. A., and Youngson, C. R. 1966. Sorption and leaching of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropcolinic acid in soils. Adv. Chem. Ser. 60:23–37.Google Scholar
Hamaker, J. W., Johnston, H., Martin, R. T., and Redeman, C. T. 1963. A picolinic acid derivative: a plant growth regulator. Science. 141:363.Google Scholar
Hance, R. J. 1969. Influence of pH, exchangeable cation, and the presence of organic matter on the adsorption of some herbicides by montmorillonite. Can. J. Soil Sci. 49:357–364.Google Scholar
Herr, D. E., Stroube, E. W., and Ray, Dale A. 1966. The movement and persistence of picloram in soil. Weeds. 14:248–250.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. and Stobbe, E. H. 1972. Movement and persistence of picloram in soil. Weed Sci. 20:486–488.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1988. Survey for picloram in North Dakota groundwater. Weed Technol. 2:217–222.Google Scholar
Nicholls, P. H. and Evans, A. A. 1991. Sorption of ionisable organic compounds by field soils. Part 1: acids. Pestic. Sci. 33:319–330.Google Scholar
Noyan, H., Önal, M., and Sarikaya, Y. 2006. The effect of heating on the surface area, porosity and surface acidity of a bentonite. Clays Clay Miner. 54:375–381.Google Scholar
Osteryoung, J. and Whittaker, J. W. 1980. Picloram: solubility and acid-base equilibria determined by normal pulse polarography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:95–97.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Locke, M. A. 1998. Sulfentrazone sorption, desorption, and mineralization in soils from two tillage systems. Weed Sci. 46:494–500.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems 2007. Software Version 9.2. Cary, NC Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Scifres, C. J., Burnside, O. C., and McCarty, M. K. 1969. Movement and persistence of picloram in pasture soils of Nebraska. Weed Sci. 17:486–488.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. ed. 2007a. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 353–356.Google Scholar
Senseman, S. A. ed. 2007b. Herbicide Handbook. 9th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 331–332.Google Scholar
Seybold, C. A. and Mersie, W. 1996. Adsorption and desorption of atrazine, deethylatrazine, deisopropylatrazine, hydroxyatrazine, and metolachlor in two soils from Virginia. J. Environ. Qual. 25:1179–1185.Google Scholar
SigmaPlot 2006. Software Version 10.0. Chicago, IL Systat Software, Inc.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E., Waite, D., Grover, R., Kerr, L. A., Milward, L. J., and Sommerstad, H. 1988. Persistence and movement of picloram in a northern Saskatchewan watershed. J. Environ. Qual. 17:262–268.Google Scholar
[USOPPEPTS] United States Office of Prevention, Pesticides, Environmental Protection, and Toxic Substances 2005. Aminopyralid Pesticide Fact Sheet. http://www.epa.gov/opprd001/factsheets/aminopyralid.pdf. Accessed: May 8, 2009.Google Scholar
Wauchope, R. D., Yeh, S., Linders, J. B., Kloskowski, R., Tanaka, K., Rubin, B., Katayama, A., Kordel, W., Gerstl, Z., Lane, M., and Unsworth, J. B. 2002. Pesticide soil sorption parameters: theory, measurement, uses, limitations, and reliability. Pest Manag. Sci. 58:419–445.Google Scholar
Weber, J. B. 1986. Herbicide adsorption by solids from solution. Pages 174–179. In Camper, N. D. ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Southern Weed Science Society. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G., Dickens, R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hajek, B. F. 1987. Sorption and mobility of sulfometuron and imazapyr in five Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 35:858–864.Google Scholar
Wood, J. A. and Anthony, D. H. J. 1997. Herbicide contamination of prairie springs at ultratrace levels of detection. J. Environ. Qual. 26:1308–1318.Google Scholar