Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:35:47.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological mechanisms for differential responses of three weed species to prosulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Guoying Ma ,
Harold D. Coble ,
Frederick T. Corbin  and
James D. Burton
Guoying Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Frederick T. Corbin
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
James D. Burton*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7609
*
[email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differential response of three weed species to prosulfuron was examined through studies of acetolactate synthase (ALS) sensitivity, uptake, translocation, and metabolism of the herbicide. Sensitivity of common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, and sicklepod ALS to prosulfuron was similar with I50 values of 3.3, 4.5, and 8.8 nM, respectively. Absorption of the herbicide increased with time for all three weed species. Percent absorption 2 d after application for common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, and sicklepod was 8, 33, and 26%, respectively. An average of 53% of the absorbed herbicide remained in the treated leaves of common cocklebur, 80% in common lambsquarters, and 93% in sicklepod. Approximately 33, 15, and 5% of the absorbed herbicide was translocated into the upper shoots of common cocklebur, common lambsquarters, and sicklepod, respectively. Metabolism of 14C-prosulfuron 1, 2, and 4 d after application was greater in sicklepod than in common lambsquarters or common cocklebur. The results suggest a combination of differential rates of translocation and metabolism may account for the differing sensitivity of these weeds at the whole plant level.

Keywords

Prosulfuroncommon cocklebur, L. Xanthium strumarium L. XANSTcommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia L. Irwin and Barneby CASOBAbsorptiontranslocationmetabolismacetolactate synthase (ALS)
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 642 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Beyer, E. M., Duffy, J. J., Hay, J. V., and Schlueter, D. D. 1988. In Kearner, P. C. and Kaufman, D. D., eds. Herbicides: Chemistry, Degradation, and Mode of Action. Volume 3. New York: Marcel-Dekker, pp. 117–189.Google Scholar
Blair, A. M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 22: 195–219.Google Scholar
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein using the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 72: 248–252.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. 1990. Mode of action, crop selectivity, and soil relations of the sulfonylurea herbicide. Pestic. Sci. 29: 263–281.Google Scholar
Brown, H. M. and Cotterman, J. C. 1994. Recent advances in sulfonylurea herbicides. in Stetter, J., ed. Herbicides Inhibiting Branched Chain Amino Acid Biosynthesis. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H. M., Wittenbach, V. A., Forney, D. R., and Strachan, S. D. 1990. Basis for soybean tolerance to thifensulfuron methyl. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 37: 303–313.Google Scholar
Burton, J. D., Maness, E. P., Monks, D. W., and Robinson, D. K. 1994. Sulfonylurea selectivity and safener activity in &Landmark& and &Merit& sweet corn. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 48: 163–172.Google Scholar
Chaleff, R. S. and Mauvais, C. V. 1984. Acetolactate synthase is the site of action of two sulfonylurea herbicides in higher plants. Science 224: 1443–1445.Google Scholar
Ciba-Geigy Corp. 1992. CGA-152005: Experimental Herbicide for Broadleaf Weed Control. Technical Information. Greensboro, NC: Ciba-Geigy.Google Scholar
Ciba-Geigy Corp. 1995. Prosulfuron: Herbicide for Broadleaf Weed Control. Technical Bulletin. Greensboro, NC: Ciba-Geigy.Google Scholar
Corbin, F. T. and Swisher, B. A. 1986. Radioisotope techniques. in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society, pp. 265–267.Google Scholar
Devine, D. D., Maries, M.A.S., and Hall, L. M. 1991. Inhibition of acetolactate synthase in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Stellaria media. Pestic. Sci. 31: 273–280.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Rosow, K. M., Geadelmann, J. L., and Openshaw, S. J. 1989. Differential tolerance of corn genotypes to DPX-M6316. Weed Sci. 37: 651–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frear, D. S. and Swanson, H. R. 1994. Oxidation of the sulfonylurea herbicide CGA-152005 by wheat seedling microsomes. 207th ACS National Meeting, San Diego, CA, March 13–17, Div. of Agrochemicals Abstr. No. 70.Google Scholar
Ma, G., Coble, H. D., Corbin, F. T., and Burton, J. D. 1996. Differential responses of weed species to prosulfuron. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. Abstr. 67: 273.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 75: 827–831.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Smith, W. F., and Primiani, M. M. 1992. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistance in common chickweed, perennial ryegrass, and Russian thistle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 42: 110–118.Google Scholar
Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., and Thill, D. C. 1994. Resistance to acetolactate synthase inhibiting herbicides. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J.A.M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 83–141.Google Scholar
Schmirzer, P. R., Eilers, R. J., and Cseke, C. 1993. Lack of cross-resistance of imazaquin-resistant Xanthium strumarium acetolactate synthase to flumetsulam and chlorimuron. Plant Physiol. 103: 281–283.Google Scholar
Siminszky, B., Corbin, F. T., and Sheldon, Y. 1995. Nicosulfuron resistance and metabolism in terbufos- and naphthalic anhydride-treated corn. Weed Sci. 43: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, B. J., Stidham, M. A., and Shaner, D. L. 1988. Assay of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Anal. Biochem. 171: 173–179.Google Scholar
Sunderland, S. L., Burton, J. D., Coble, H. D., and Maness, E. P. 1995. Physiological mechanism for tall morningglory resistance to DPX-PE350. Weed Sci. 43: 21–27.Google Scholar
Sweetser, P. B., Schow, P. B., and Hutchison, G. S. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17: 18–23.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C, Mallory-Smith, C. A., Saari, L. L., Cotterman, J. C., Primiani, M. M., and Saladini, J. L. 1990. Sulfonylurea herbicide resistant weeds: discovery, distribution, biology, mechanism, and management. in Caseley, J. C., Cussans, G. W., and Atkin, R. D., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Weeds and Crops. Jordan Hill, Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. Linacre House, pp. 115–129.Google Scholar