Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:02:01.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological Effects of Bromacil on Kentucky Bluegrass and Orchardgrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. W. Shriver  and
S. W. Bingham
J. W. Shriver
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Path. and Physiol., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. 24061
S. W. Bingham
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Path. and Physiol., Virginia Polytech. Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA. 24061
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil) had no effect on germination but reduced growth of emerging shoots of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L. ‘Virginia Common’) more than Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratense L. ‘Merion’). Fresh weight gain and transpiration were reduced in orchardgrass seedlings at 0.125 ppmw of bromacil whereas 1.0 ppmw were required for reductions in bluegrass. Photosynthesis was inhibited in both plants; however, bluegrass recovered in 6 days. Water soluble carbohydrate content was greater and was not reduced as much by bromacil in bluegrass compared with orchardgrass. Absorption of 2-14C-bromacil from solution and translocation to shoots was directly related to transpiration rate. Bromacil was translocated acropetally from sheath and foliar treatments. Higher metabolic conversion of 2-14C-bromacil occurred in bluegrass compared to orchardgrass. Metabolites detected in plant extracts were 5-bromo-3-(2-hydroxy-1-methylpropyl)-6-methyluracil and an unknown. Traces of 3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil and 5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-hydroxymethyluracil were also detected. Bluegrass tolerance involved high carbohydrate levels in tissues, hydroxylation of bromacil, and recovery of photosynthesis.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , May 1973 , pp. 212 - 217
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M., Cutter, Elizabeth G., and Huffstutter, Donna. 1969. Growth and structural modifications of oats induced by bromacil. Weed Res. 9:198–204.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Isoparaffinic oil as a carrier for chloropropham and terbacil. Weed Sci. 18:365–372.Google Scholar
3. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Selective action of terbacil on peppermint and ivyleaf morningglory. Weed Sci. 18:373–377.Google Scholar
4. Bayer, D. E. and Yamaguchi, S. 1965. Absorption and distribution of diuron-C14 . Weeds 13:232–235.Google Scholar
5. Broadhurst, N. A., Montgomery, M. L., and Freed, V. H. 1966. Metabolism of 2-methoxy-3,6-dichloro-benzoic acid (dicamba) by wheat and bluegrass plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 14:585–588.Google Scholar
6. Couch, R. W. and Davis, D. E. 1966. Effect of atrazine, bromacil and diquat on C14O2-fixation in corn, cotton and soybeans. Weeds 14:251–255.Google Scholar
7. Figuerola, L. F. and Furtick, W. R. 1972. Effect of climatic conditions on phytotoxicity of terbutryn. Weed Sci. 20:60–63.Google Scholar
8. Gardiner, J. A., Reiser, R. W., and Sherman, H. 1969. Identification of the metabolites of bromacil in rat urine. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:967–973.Google Scholar
9. Gardiner, J. A., Rhodes, R. C., Adams, J. B. Jr., and Soboczenski, E. J. 1969. Synthesis and studies with 2-C14-labeled bromacil and terbacil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:980–986.Google Scholar
10. Hilton, J. L., Monaco, T. J., Moreland, D. E., and Gentner, W. A. 1964. Mode of action of substituted uracil herbicides. Weeds 12:129–131.Google Scholar
11. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta., Berkeley, Circ. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
12. Hoffmann, C. E., McGahen, J. W., and Sweetser, P. B. 1964. Effect of substituted uracil herbicides on photosynthesis. Nature 202:577–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Jordan, L. S., Murashige, T., Mann, J. D., and Day, B. E. 1966. Effect of photosynthesis inhibiting herbicides on nonphotosynthetic tobacco callus tissue. Weeds 14:134–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Morris, D. L. 1948. Quantitative determination of carbohydrates with Dreywoods Anthrone reagent. Science 107:254–255.Google Scholar
15. Murata, Y. 1969. Physiological responses to nitrogen in plants. Pages 235–259 in Eastin, J. D., Haskins, F. A., Sullivan, C. Y., and Van Bavel, C. H. M., eds. Physiological aspects of crop yield. Amer. Soc. Agron. and Crop Sci. Soc. of Amer., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
16. Negi, N. S., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Davis, D. E. 1964. Metabolism of atrazine by susceptible and resistant plants. Weeds 12:53–57.Google Scholar
17. O'Neill, L. A. 1963. Substituted uracils for weed control. Proc. Agr. Pest. Tech. Soc. Canada 10:8–13.Google Scholar
18. Pancholy, S. K. and Lynd, J. Q. 1969. Bromacil interactions in plant bioassay, fungi cultures and nitrification. Weed Sci. 17:460–463.Google Scholar
19. Van Oorschot, J. L. P. 1965. Selectivity and physiological inactivation of some herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis. Weed Res. 5:84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Van Oorschot, J. L. P. 1970. Effect of transpiration rate of bean plants on inhibition of photosynthesis by some root-applied herbicides. Weed Res. 10:230–242.Google Scholar
21. Wax, L. M. and Behrens, R. 1965. Absorption and translocation of atrazine in quackgrass. Weeds 13:107–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar