Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:53:24.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistence of Dichlobenil and SD-7961 in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. J. Sheets
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
C. I. Harris
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland
J. W. Smith
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland

Abstract

The phytotoxicities of soil-incorporated 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile [dichlobenil] and 2,6-dichlorothiobenzamide [hereinafter referred to as SD-7961] were compared in five soils in the greenhouse. Dichlobenil and SD-7961 were about equally toxic to snap beans (Phaseolus vulgarus L., var. Black Valentine) in each of the five soils. The herbicides were more toxic in Christiana loam than in the other four soils. Phytotoxic residues of both herbicides disappeared most rapidly from Hagerstown silty clay loam and Christiana loam and least rapidly from Sharkey clay. Gas chromatographic analyses of soil extracts confirmed that dichlobenil was most persistent in the clay. Small amounts (0.14 ppmw or less) of 2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid [hereinafter referred to as 2,6-DBA] were detected in soil from greenhouse pot cultures about 9 months after incorporation of dichlobenil. In a field experiment at Beltsville, Maryland, residues of dichlobenil persisted from one season to the next but did not build up in soil sprayed annually for 3 years with 4 or 8 lb/A. Some movement from the surface 6 in into the 6 to 12-in zone occurred on plots sprayed 2 years in succession with 8 lb/A or once with 40 lb/A. Rapid loss of dichlobenil occurred during summer months. When the concentration of dichlobenil on the 40-lb/A plots dropped to about 10%, subsequent loss occurred at a very slow rate.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arle, H. F., Miller, J. H., and Sheets, T. J. 1965. Disappearance of herbicides from irrigated soils. Weeds 13:5660.Google Scholar
2. Barnsley, G. E. and Rosher, P. H. 1961. The relationship between the herbicidal effect of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile and its persistence in the soil. Weed Res. 1:147158.Google Scholar
3. Daams, J. 1965. Das Verhalten von Dichlobenil in Boden und Pflanze. Zeitschrift fur Pflanzenkrankheigten (Pflanzenpathologie) und Pflanzenschutz [Sonderheft 111] 172:139144.Google Scholar
4. Massini, P. 1961. Movement of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile in soils and in plants in relation to its physical properties. Weed Res. 1:142146.Google Scholar
5. Meulemans, K. J. and Upton, E. T. 1966. Determination of dichlobenil and its metabolite, 2,6-dichlorobenzoic acid, in agricultural crops, fish, soil, and water. J. Assoc. Offic. Anal. Chemists 49:976981.Google Scholar
6. Milborrow, B. V. 1963. The formation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile from related compounds in plants. Biochem. J. 87:255258.Google Scholar
7. Milborrow, B. V. 1965. Effects of rate of formation of 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile on its toxicity to plants. Weed Res. 5:332342.Google Scholar
8. Miller, C. W., Demoranville, I. E., and Charig, A. J. 1966. Persistence of dichlobenil in cranberry bogs. Weeds 14:296298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sheets, T. J., Crafts, A. S., and Drever, H. R. 1962. Influence of soil properties on the phytotoxicities of the s-triazine herbicides. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:458462.Google Scholar