Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:43:11.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of Carbon-Coated Rice Seed on Flooded Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. Nangju ,
D. L. Plucknett  and
S. R. Obien
D. Nangju
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron. and Soil Sci., Univ. of Hawaii, HI 96822
D. L. Plucknett
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron. and Soil Sci., Univ. of Hawaii, HI 96822
S. R. Obien
Affiliation:
Dept. Agron. and Soil Sci., Univ. of Hawaii, HI 96822
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pelleting rice (Oryza sativa L., ‘IR8′) seeds with activated carbon was developed as a means of overcoming herbicide phytotoxicity to direct-seeded, flooded rice. Field and greenhouse experiments showed that pregerminated rice seeds coated three times with activated carbon with 50% polyvinyl acetate as an adhesive, were adequately protected from the injurious effects of chloramben (3-amino-2,5-dichlorobenzoic acid), butachlor [N-(butoxymethyl)-2-chloro-2′,6′-diethylacetanilide] and oxadiazon [2-tert-butyl-4-(2,4-dichloro-5-isopropoxyphenyl)-Δ2-1,3,4-oxadiazolin-5-one]. The performance of carbon-coated rice seeds in flooded soil, however, was dependent on time of flooding, method and rate of sowing, rate and time of herbicide application, and quality of activated carbon.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 1976 , pp. 73 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arte, H.F., Leonard, O.A., and Harris, V.C. 1948. Inactivation of 2,4-D on sweet potato slips with activated carbon. Science 107:247–248.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O.C., Wicks, G.A., and Fenser, C.R. 1971. Protecting corn from herbicide injury by seed treatment. Weed Sci. 19:565–568.Google Scholar
3. Burr, R.J., Lee, W.O., and Appleby, A.P. 1972. Factors affecting use of activated carbon to improve herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 20:180–183.Google Scholar
4. Coffey, D.L. and Warren, G.F. 1969. Inactivation of herbicides by activated carbon and other adsorbents. Weed Sci. 17:16–19.Google Scholar
5. DeDatta, S.K., Lacsina, R.Q., and Seaman, D.E. 1971. Phenoxy acid herbicides for barnyardgrass control in transplanted rice. Weed Sci. 19:203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gray, R.A. and Weierich, A.J. 1969. The importance of root, shoot and seed exposure on the herbicidal activity of EPTC. Weed Sci. 17:223–229.Google Scholar
7. Green, R.E. and Obien, S.R. 1969. Herbicide equilibrium in soils in relation to soil water content. Weed Sci. 17:514–519.Google Scholar
8. Hassler, J.W. 1963. Activated carbon. Chemical Publishing Co., Inc. New York. 397 pp.Google Scholar
9. International Rice Research Institute. 1969. Annual Report for 1968. Los Banos, Philippines. 266 pp.Google Scholar
10. Jordan, P.D. and Smith, L.W. 1971. Adsorption and deactivation of atrazine and diuron by charcoals. Weed Sci. 19:541–45.Google Scholar
11. Kratky, B.A., Coffey, D.L., and Warren, G.F. 1970. Activated carbon root dips on transplanted strawberries. Weed Sci. 18:577–580.Google Scholar
12. Kratky, B.A. and Warren, G.F. 1971. Activated carbon-vermiculite mixture for increasing herbicide selectivity. Weed Sci. 19:79–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Linscott, D.L. and Hagin, R.D. 1967. Protecting Alfalfa seedlings from a triazine with activated charcoal. Weed Sci. 15:304–306.Google Scholar
14. Locascio, S.J. 1967. Effect of activated charcoal on the toxicity of dichlobenil to vegetables. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 20:157–163.Google Scholar
15. Obien, S.R. and Plucknett, D.L. 1970. Chloramben and five newer herbicides for weed control in transplanted rice. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:711–717.Google Scholar
16. Obien, S.R., Plucknett, D.L., de la Pena, R.S., and Shibao, G.H. 1971. Weed control in direct-sown rice. Studies with benthiocarb, RP 17623, and MBR 76343. Proc. 3rd Asian-Pac. Weed Contr. Inter., Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 2:241–243.Google Scholar
17. Palada, M.C. and Vergara, B.S. 1972. Environmental effects on the resistance of rice seedlings to complete submergence. Crop Sci. 12:209–212.Google Scholar
18. Plucknett, D.L. 1971. Use of pelleted seed in crop and pastures establishment. Coop. Ext. Serv. Cir. 446, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu. 15 pp.Google Scholar
19. Ripper, W.E. 1956. A new method of selective weed control for related plants, in particular broadleaf weeds in beet. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 3:225–233.Google Scholar
20. Robinson, D.W. 1965. The use of adsorbents and simazine on newly planted strawberries. Weed Res. 5:43–51.Google Scholar
21. Smith, R.J. Jr. and Fox, W.T. 1971. Progress report of weed control in rice. Rice J. 74:35–37.Google Scholar
22. Stickler, R.I., Knake, E.L., and Hinesly, T.D. 1969. Soil moisture and effectiveness of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 17:257–259.Google Scholar
23. Talbert, R.E., Runyan, R.L., and Baker, H.R. 1970. Behaviour of amiben and dinoben derivatives in Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 18:10–15.Google Scholar
24. Weber, J.B., Perry, P.W., and Upchurch, R.P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D and prometone by clays, charcoal and an anion exchange resin. Soil Sci. of Am. Proc. 29:678–688.Google Scholar
25. Yamane, V.K. and Green, R.E. 1972. Adsorption of ametryne and atrazine on an oxisol, montmorillonite, and charcoal in relation to pH and solubility effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 36:58–64.Google Scholar