Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T15:18:05.474Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pendimethalin Efficacy and Dissipation in Turfgrass as Influenced by Rainfall Incorporation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John J. Gasper ,
John R. Street ,
S. Kent Harrison  and
William E. Pound
John J. Gasper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
John R. Street
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
S. Kent Harrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
William E. Pound
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2-yr field study was conducted to determine effects of posttreatment irrigation timing on pendimethalin efficacy and dissipation in turfgrass. Factors investigated included herbicide rate, formulation, and the interval between pendimethalin application and the initial posttreatment irrigation. Plots received an initial posttreatment irrigation of 1.25 cm 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 d after treatment. Pendimethalin efficacy on smooth crabgrass was evaluated, and turfgrass foliage and the upper 2.5-cm layer of soil were periodically assayed for pendimethalin residues. Pendimethalin 1.71% granular provided better weed control than pendimethalin 60% wettable powder at all rates, irrigation events, and years. Efficacy of granular pendimethalin was not affected by a delay in posttreatment irrigation, whereas efficacy of pendimethalin in the wettable powder formulation was reduced when irrigation was applied later than the day of treatment. Chromatographic analyses indicated that an average of 54% of the applied pendimethalin (wettable powder formulation) was retained on turfgrass foliage immediately after treatment, compared to 9% for the granular formulation. Soil residue analyses confirmed that a greater proportion of applied pendimethalin reached the soil surface immediately after treatment in the granular formulation than in the wettable power formulation.

Keywords

Pendimethalin, N-(1-ethylpropyl)-3,4-dimethyl-2,6-dinitrobenzenaminesmooth crabgrass, Digitaria ischaemum (L.) (Schreb. ex Schweig.) Schreb. ex Muhl. # DIGISDinitroanilinesposttreatment irrigationpreemergence herbicidesPoa pratensisDIGIS
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 586 - 592
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–92.Google Scholar
2. Barrett, M. R. and Lavy, T. L. 1983. Effects of soil water content on pendimethalin dissipation. J. Environ. Qual. 12:504–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cooper, R. J., Jenkins, J. J., and Curtis, A. S. 1990. Pendimethalin volatility following application to turfgrass. J. Environ. Qual. 19:508–513.Google Scholar
4. Davis, R. R. 1958. The effect of other species and mowing height on persistence of lawn grasses. Agron. J. 50:671–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Gibson, R. D. and Hamilton, K. C. 1977. Dinitroaniline herbicide persistence under fallow and irrigated conditions. Proc. West. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 30:52–54.Google Scholar
6. Harris, C. I. 1967. Movement of herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:214–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hurton, K. A. and Turgeon, A. J. 1979. Influence of thatch on preemergence herbicide activity in Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) turf. Weed Sci. 27:154–157.Google Scholar
9. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Persistence of dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. Weed Sci. 27:660–665.Google Scholar
10. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of DNA type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373–381.Google Scholar
11. Ketchersid, M. L., Bovey, R. W., and Merkle, M. G. 1969. The detection of trifluralin vapors in air. Weed Sci. 17:484–485.Google Scholar
12. Lambert, S. M. 1968. Omega, a useful index of soil sorption equilibria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:340–343.Google Scholar
13. Leitus, E. and Crosby, D. G. 1974. Photodecomposition of trifluralin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22: 842–348.Google Scholar
14. Menges, R. M. and Tamez, S. 1974. Movement and persistence of bensulide and trifluralin in irrigated soil. Weed Sci. 22:67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Messersmith, C. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1971. Biological and non-biological degradation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285–290.Google Scholar
16. Meyer, L. D. and Harmon, W. C. 1979. Multiple-intensity rainfall simulator erosion research on row sideslopes. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 100–103.Google Scholar
17. Parochetti, J. V. and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Parochetti, J. V. and Dec, G. W. Jr. 1978. Photodecomposition of 11 dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 26:153–156.Google Scholar
19. Parochetti, J. V., Dec, G. W., and Burt, G. W. 1976. Volatility of 11 dinitroaniline herbicides. Weed Sci. 24:120–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Prinster, M. G. and Hurto, K. A. 1989. Dislodgeable residues of pesticides applied to lawn turfs. Agron. Abstr. 81:163.Google Scholar
21. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.Google Scholar
22. Sirons, G. J., Anderson, G. W., Frank, R., and Ripley, B. D. 1982. Persistence of hormone-type herbicide residues in tissue of susceptible crop plants. Weed Sci. 30:572–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Stahnke, G. K., Shea, P. J., Tupy, D. R., Stougaard, R. N., and Shearman, R. C. 1991. Pendimethalin dissipation in Kentucky bluegrass turf. Weed Sci. 39:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Thompson, D. J. and Stephenson, G. R. 1984. Persistence, distribution, and dislodgeable residues of 2,4-D following its application to turfgrass. Pestic. Sci. 15:353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Walker, A. and Bond, W. 1977. Persistence of the herbicide AC-92553 (N-(1-ethylpropyl)-2,6-dinitro-3,4-xylidine), in soils. Pestic. Sci. 8:359–365.Google Scholar
26. Wauchope, R. D. 1978. The pesticide content of surface water drainage from agricultural fields—a review. J. Environ. Qual. 7:459–472.Google Scholar
27. Weber, J. B. 1988. Behavior of dinitroaniline herbicides in soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. Feb. Page 108.Google Scholar
28. Weber, J. B., Shea, P. J., and Strek, H. J. 1980. An evaluation of non-point sources of pesticide pollution in runoff. Pages 68–98 in Overcash, M. R. and Davison, J. M., eds. Environmental Impact at Non-point Source Pollution. Ann Arbor Sci. Publishing, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
29. Weed Science Society of America. 1983. Herbicide Handbook. 5th ed. Champaign, IL. Pages 369–372.Google Scholar
30. Wright, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Zimdahl, R. L., Catizone, P., and Butler, A. C. 1984. Degradation of pendimethalin in the soil. Weed Sci. 32:408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar