Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:14:40.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Movements of Herbicides through Isolated American Pondweed (Potamogeton nodosus) Epidermal Tissues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

John C. Pringle Jr.  and
Lars W. J. Anderson
John C. Pringle Jr.
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Aquatic Weed Control Lab., P.O. Box 25007, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
Lars W. J. Anderson
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Aquatic Weed Control Lab., P.O. Box 25007, Denver Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enzymatically isolated American pondweed (Potamogeton nodosus Poir.) epidermal tissues were exposed to 14C-labeled dichlobenil (2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile), diquat (6,7-dihydrodipyrido[1,2-α: 2′, 1′-c] pyrazinediium ion), silvex [2-(2,4,5-trichlorophenoxy) propionic acid] or 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at concentrations of 5 × 10−4, 5 × 10−5, and 5 × 10−610M, and the amount of herbicide crossing the tissue layer was measured. Rates of herbicide movement were compared to those found when copper sulfate pentahydrate was added as a potential synergist at concentrations of 5 × 10−5 M (12.5 ppm), 5 × 10−6 M (1.25 ppm), and 5 × 10−7 M (0.125 ppm). Copper sulfate at 5 × 10−6 M increased the rate of movement of all herbicides. However, diquat and dichlobenil exhibited the most enhanced movement in the presence of copper sulfate. Without copper sulfate, 0.1 nmoles of 5 × 10−6 M 14C diquat penetrated the tissue within 24 h, compared to 1.3 nmoles following the addition of 5 × 10−7 M of copper sulfate.

Keywords

Dichlobenildiquatsilvex2,4-Dcopper sulfatesynergism
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , July 1980 , pp. 419 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartley, T. R. 1967. Progress report on evaluation of copper for aquatic weed control and herbicide residues on irrigation systems. U.S. Dep. Inter. Rep. No. WC-32. 55 pp.Google Scholar
2. Button, K. S. and Hostetter, H. P. 1977. Copper dispersal in a water-supply reservoir. Water Res. 11:539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Davies, P. J. and Seaman, D. E. 1968. Uptake and translocation of diquat in elodea. Weeds 16:293–295.Google Scholar
4. Mottley, J. and Kirkwood, R. C. 1978. The uptake, translocation and metabolism of dichlobenil in selected aquatic species. Weed Res. 18:187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Otsuki, Y. and Takebe, J. 1969. Isolation of intact mesophyll cells and their protoplasts from higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 10. 917–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Richardson, R. G. 1977. A review of foliar absorption and translocation of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T. Weed Res. 17:259–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sikka, H. C., Lynch, R. S., and Lindenberger, M. 1974. Uptake and metabolism of dichlobenil by emersed aquatic plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:230–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Stanley, R. A. 1974. Effect of 2,4-D and various salts on Eurasian watermilfoil. Weed Sci. 22:591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Sutton, D. L. and Foy, C. L. 1971. Effect of diquat and several surfactants on membrane permeability in red beet root tissue. Bot. Gaz. 132:299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Sutton, D. L., Haller, W. L., Steward, K. K., and Blackburn, R. D. 1972. Effect of copper on uptake of diquat-14C by hydrilla. Weed Sci. 20:581–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Sutton, D. L., Weldon, L. W., and Blackburn, R. D. 1970. Effect of diquat on uptake of copper in aquatic plants. Weed Sci. 18:703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Swader, J. A. 1978. Diquat enhancement of cupric ion toxicity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 9:140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Yamada, Y., Wittwer, S. H., and Bukovac, M. J. 1964. Penetration of ions through isolated cuticles. Plant Physiol. 39:28–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Zhirmunskaya, N. M. 1975. Penetration of plant cells by organic herbicides. Fiziol. Rast. 22:408–420.Google Scholar