Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:55:34.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Littleseed Canarygrass (Phalaris minor) and Short-spiked Canarygrass (Phalaris brachystachys) Interference in Wheat and Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Catherine G. Afentouli  and
I. G. Eleftherohorinos
Catherine G. Afentouli
Affiliation:
Lab. Agron., Box 233, Univ. Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
I. G. Eleftherohorinos
Affiliation:
Lab. Agron., Box 233, Univ. Thessaloniki, 54006 Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were established in Greece from 1990 to 1993 to study the effect of littleseed and short-spiked canarygrass density on wheat and barley yield, as well as the influence of littleseed canarygrass removal time on wheat yield. Competitive ability of both canarygrass species in wheat was similar, though littleseed canarygrass showed faster growth rate and formed more panicles than short-spiked canarygrass. Grain yield of wheat was not significantly affected by the presence of 76 plants m−2 of either canarygrass species, but it was reduced by 36 to 39% by the presence of 304 canarygrass plants m−2. None of the canarygrass species at any density had any effect on grain yield of wheat when cold and dry conditions prevailed during the early stages of growth. Grain yield of barley was not affected by any density of either canarygrass species. Growth and consequently panicle number of both canarygrass species were severely reduced by the interference of barley. The littleseed canarygrass removal time study indicated that emergence of this weed was completed by the middle of February. Grain yield of wheat grown with 150 littleseed canarygrass plants m−2 was not affected even when these plants were removed early in April. However, the presence of these canarygrass plants until harvest reduced grain yield of wheat by 23 to 28%.

Keywords

Wheat, Triticum aestivum(L.) ‘Yekora’barley, Hordeum distichum(L.) ‘Carina’littleseed canarygrass, Phalaris minor Retz. ♯ PHAMIshort-spiked canarygrass, Phalaris brachystachys Link. ♯ PHABRCompetitionallelopathycanarygrass densityPHAMIPHABR
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 560 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1978. Relazione dell' attivita sperimentale anno 1976. Ist. Agron. Gen. e Coltivazioni Erbacee, Univ. di Bologna, Italy. Prosopis glandulosa Torr. pp. 160–170.Google Scholar
2. Bell, C. E. 1992. Littleseed canarygrass control in cereal grains. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. pp. 232–233.Google Scholar
3. Bir, S. S. and Sidhu, M. 1979. Observations on the weed flora of cultivable lands in Punjab—wheat fields in Patiala District. New Botanist 6: 79–89.Google Scholar
4. Butler, M. D., Howell, D. R., and Tickes, B. R. 1993. Littleseed canarygrass and london rocket control in bok choy with benefin and DCPA. Res. Prog. Rep. West Soc. Weed Sci. p. 115.Google Scholar
5. Catizone, P. and Viggiani, P. 1978. Primi risultati di ricerche sulla biologia del genere Phalaris. Fitoiatria del frumento del mais e del sorgo. Ist. Agron. Gen. e Coltivazioni Erbacee, Univ. di Bologna, Italy, pp. 213–228.Google Scholar
6. Catizone, P. and Viggiani, P. 1980. Un quadriennio di ricerche sulle falaridi infestanti il grano. Atti. Gi. Fitopatolog., Suppl. 3: 257–311.Google Scholar
7. Cudney, D. W. and Hill, J. E. 1979. The response of wheal grown with three population levels of canarygrass to various herbicide treatments. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 32: 55–56.Google Scholar
8. Damanakis, M. E. 1983. Weed species in wheat fields of Greece—1982, 1983 survey. Zizaniology 1: 85–90.Google Scholar
9. Dew, D. A. 1972. Effect of wild oat density on yields of wheat, barley, rape and flax. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27: 38–39.Google Scholar
10. Fogelfors, H. 1977. The competition between barley and five weed species as influenced by MCPA treatments. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 7: 147–151.Google Scholar
11. Garcia, B. J. M. 1983. Importancia del genero Phalaris corno adventicia en los cereales de invierno espanoles. Agricultura 52: 526–528.Google Scholar
12. Gill, H. S. and Mehra, S. P. 1981. Growth and development of Phalaris minor Retz., Chenopodium album and Melilotus indica All. in wheat crop ecosystem. Proc. 8th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. pp. 175–179.Google Scholar
13. Godinho, I. and Costa, J. C. A. 1981. Concorrencia da Phalaris minor Retz. na cultura de trigo. 1 Congresso Portugues de Fitiatria e de Fitofarmacologia e III Simposio Nacional de Herbologia, 1980. 3: 237–243.Google Scholar
14. Jimenez-Hidaldo, M. J., Saavedra, M., and Garcia-Torres, L. 1991. La emergencia de Phalaris spp. en el sur de Espana. Proc. Span. Soc. Weed Sci. pp. 65–69.Google Scholar
15. Kumar, V. and Kataria, O. P. 1977. Germination pattern and growth of Phalaris minor L. seeded at different depths. Proc. 6th Asian-Pacific Weed Sci. Soc. conf. 1: 75–79.Google Scholar
16. Mehra, S. P. and Gill, H. S. 1988. Effect of temperature on germination of Phalaris minor Retz. and its competition in wheat. Punjab Agric. Univ. Res. J. 25: 529–533.Google Scholar
17. Montegut, J. 1979. Facteurs climatiques et developpment des graminees envahissantes des cereales en France. Proc. European Weed Res. Soc. Symp. on the influence of different factors on the development and control of weeds, pp. 49–56.Google Scholar
18. Moss, S. R. 1987. Competition between blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides) and winter wheat. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds, pp. 367–374.Google Scholar
19. Overland, L. 1966. The role of allelopathic substances in the “smother crop” barley. Amer. J. Bot. 53: 423–432.Google Scholar
20. Porwal, M. K. and Gupta, D. P. 1989. Phenology of weeds in wheat as influenced by weed control. Madras Agric. J. 76: 630–635.Google Scholar
21. Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1979. Use of allelopathic cover crops to inhibit weeds. Science 36: 580–582.Google Scholar
22. Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1983. Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Prot. 2: 173–181.Google Scholar
23. Rosenthal, S. S., Maddox, D. M., and Brenetti, K. 1985. Biological control methods. Pages 65–94 in Principles of Weed control in California. Thomson Publications, Fresno.Google Scholar
24. Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421.Google Scholar