Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:45:21.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaf characteristics and surfactants affect primisulfuron droplet spread in three broadleaf weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Debanjan Sanyal ,
Prasanta C. Bhowmik  and
Krishna N. Reddy
Prasanta C. Bhowmik
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003
Krishna N. Reddy
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to examine the leaf surface, epicuticular wax content, and spray droplet behavior on common lambsquarters, common purslane, and velvetleaf. Adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy, and leaf wax was extracted and quantified for all three weed species. The spread of 1-μl droplets of distilled water, primisulfuron solution (without surfactant), primisulfuron solution with a nonionic low foam wetter/spreader adjuvant (0.25% v/v), and with an organosilicone wetting agent (0.1% v/v) was determined on the adaxial leaf surfaces of each of the weed species. Glands and trichomes were present on both the adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces of velvetleaf. Common purslane had neither glands nor trichomes on either side of the leaf. Common lambsquarters did not have any glands or trichomes, but it had globular bladder hairs on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces. Stomata were present on both adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces in all three weed species. Common purslane had a much lower number of stomata per unit area of leaf as compared with velvetleaf or common lambsquarters. Common lambsquarters had the highest epicuticular wax content on the leaf surface (274.5 μg cm−2), followed by common purslane (153.4 μg cm−2) and velvetleaf (7.4 μg cm−2). There were no significant variations in the spread of the 1-μl droplet of distilled water and primisulfuron (without adjuvant) among the species. Spread of primisulfuron droplets with surfactant was highest on the leaf surface of velvetleaf that had the lowest wax content. Droplet spread was greatest with organosilicone surfactant followed by the nonionic surfactant.

Keywords

Primisulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. CHEALcommon purslane, Portulaca oleracea L. POROLvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik, ABUTHEpicuticular waxdroplet spreadleaf surface morphologyscanning electron microscopysurfactant
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 2006 , pp. 16 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, E. A. 1982. Chemistry and morphology of plant epicuticular waxes. Pages 139–166 in Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E. eds. The Plant Cuticle. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A. and Mortensen, D. A. 1992. A comparison of economic optimum thresholds for two annual weeds in soybeans:. Weed Technol 6:228–235.Google Scholar
Bellinder, R. R., Arsenovic, M., Shah, D. A., and Rauch, B. J. 2003. Effect of weed growth stage and adjuvant on the efficacy of fomesafen and bentazon. Weed Sci 51:1016–1021.Google Scholar
Benzing, D. H. and Burt, K. M. 1970. Foliar permeability among twenty species of the Bromeliaceae. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 97:269–279.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1995. Integrated techniques for controlling Elytrigia repens populations. Pages 611–618 in Proceedings of the 9th Annual Changes for Weed Science in a Changing Europe. Doorwerth, The Netherlands: European Weed Research Society.Google Scholar
Bhowmik, P. C. 1999. Effects of primisulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) populations in corn (Zea mays). Pages 466–471 in The Proceedings of the 17th Annual Weeds and Environmental Impact Conference. Bangkok, Thailand: Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Chachalis, D., Reddy, K. N., and Elmore, C. D. 2001a. Characterization of leaf surface, wax composition, and control of redvine and trumpetcreeper with glyphosate. Weed Sci 49:156–163.Google Scholar
Chachalis, D., Reddy, K. N., Elmore, C. D., and Steele, M. L. 2001b. Herbicide efficacy, leaf structure, and spray droplet contact angle among Ipomoea species and small flower morningglory. Weed Sci 49:628–634.Google Scholar
Colquhoun, J., Stoltenberg, D. E., Binning, L. K., and Boerboom, C. M. 2001. Phenology of common lambsquarters growth parameters. Weed Sci 49:177–183.Google Scholar
[CPR] Crop Protection Reference, 18th edition. 2002. New York: C & P. Pp. 1791–1796.Google Scholar
Ferreira, J. F. S. and Reddy, K. N. 2000. Absorption and translocation of glyphosate in Erythroxylum coca and E. novogranatense . Weed Sci 48:193–199.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. 2002. Weed specificity of alcohol ethoxylate surfactants applied with rimsulfuron. Weed Technol 16:79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harr, J., Guggenheim, R., Schulke, G., and Falk, R. H. 1991. The leaf surface of major weeds. Champaign, IL: Sandoz Agro.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D. 1985. Herbicide absorption and translocation and their relationship to plant tolerances and susceptibility. Pages 191–214 in Duke, S. O. ed. Weed Physiology. Volume II. Herbicide Physiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D., Bayer, D. E., and Falk, R. H. 1974. Herbicide dispersal patterns, 1: as a function of leaf surface. Weed Sci 22:394–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci 1:156–163.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Chenopodium album L. Chenopodiaceae, goosefoot family. Pages 84–91 in The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution and Ecology. Honolulu, HI: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Hull, H. M. 1970. Leaves structure as related to absorption of pesticides and other compounds. Pages 1–155 in Gunther, F. A. and Gunther, J. D. eds. Residue Review. Volume 31. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Actions of adjuvant on plant surface. Pages 26–67 in Adjuvants for Herbicides. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. E., Hazen, J. L., and Penner, D. 2002. Citric ester surfactants as adjuvants with herbicides. Weed Technol 16:867–872.Google Scholar
Juniper, B. E. 1960. Growth, development, and the effect of environment on the ultrastructure of plant surfaces. J. Linn. Soc. Bot 56:413–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juniper, B. E. and Bradley, D. E. 1958. The carbon replica technique in the study of the ultrastructure of leaf surfaces. J. Ultrastruct. Res 2:16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. C., McKay, I., and Livingstone, R. 1982. The use of model systems to study the cuticular penetration of 14C- MCPA and 14C-MCPB. Pages 253–266 in Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E., eds. The Plant Cuticle. Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 10. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1985. The physiological effects of adjuvants on plants. Pages 141–158 in Duke, S. O. ed. Weed Physiology: Herbicide Physiology. Volume II. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. Epicuticular wax on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) leaves. Weed Sci 41:475–482.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1997. Common purslane (Portulaca oleracea). Weed Technol 11:394–397.Google Scholar
Nandula, V. K., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., and Hartwig, N. L. 1995. Effectiveness of adjuvants with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron for wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) control in no till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 9:525–530.Google Scholar
Ormrod, D. J. and Renney, A. J. 1968. A survey of weed leaf stomata and trichomes. Can. J. Plant Sci 48:197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sattin, M., Zanin, G., and Berti, A. 1992. Case history for weed competition/population ecology: velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 6:213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, N. R. 1984. Velvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti, history and economic impact in the United States. Econ. Bot 38:407–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, D. and Holloway, P. J. 1993. Possible mechanisms for surfactant induced foliar uptake of agrochemicals. Pestic. Sci 38:165–177.Google Scholar
Strahan, R. E., Griffin, J. L., Jordan, D. L., and Miller, D. K. 2000. Influence of adjuvants on Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) control in corn (Zea mays) with nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol 14:66–71.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci 4:215–231.Google Scholar
Warwick, S. I. and Black, L. D. 1988. The biology of Canadian weeds. 90. Abutilon theophrasti . Can. J. Plant Sci 68:1069–1085.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, P., Holloway, P. J., and Caseley, J. C. 1982. The epicuticular wax of wild oats in relation to foliar entry of the herbicides diclofopmethyl and difenzoquat. Pages 315–330 in Cutler, D. F., Alvin, K. L., and Price, C. E. eds. The Plant Cuticle. Linn. Soc. Symp. Ser. 10. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar