Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T21:33:18.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference of turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) and Mexican pricklepoppy (Argemone mexicana) in wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Sudheesh Manalil Open the ORCID record for Sudheesh Manalil [Opens in a new window]  and
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Sudheesh Manalil*
Affiliation:
Honorary Associate Professor, Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia; Adjunct Lecturer, School of Agriculture and Environment, University of Western Australia, Perth, Crawley, WA, Australia; Professor, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, India
Bhagirath Singh Chauhan
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Sudheesh Manalil, Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Turnipweed [Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All.] and Mexican pricklepoppy (Argemone mexicana L.) are increasingly prevalent in the northern cropping regions of Australia. The effect of different densities of these two weeds was examined for their potential to cause yield loss in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through field studies in 2016 and 2017. There was 72% to 78% yield reduction in wheat due to competition from R. rugosum. Based on the exponential decay model, 18.2 and 24.3 plants m−2 caused a yield reduction of 50% in 2016 and 2017, respectively. Rapistrum rugosum produced a maximum of 32,042 and 29,761 seeds m−2 in 2016 and 2017, respectively. There was 100% weed seed retention at crop harvest. Competition from A. mexicana resulted in a yield loss of 17% and 22% in 2016 and 2017, respectively; however, plants failed to set seeds due to intense competition from wheat. Among the yield components, panicles per square meter and grains per panicle were affected by weed competition. The studies indicate a superior competitiveness of R. rugosum in wheat and a suppressive effect of wheat on A. mexicana. The results indicate that a wheat crop can be included in crop rotation programs where crop fields are infested with A. mexicana. High seed retention in R. rugosum indicates the possibility to manage this weed through seed catching and harvest weed seed destruction.

Keywords

Prashant Jha, Iowa State UniversityBiologyseed productionseed retentionweed competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 666 - 672
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkins, SW, Wills, D, Boersma, M, Walker, SR, Robinson, G, McLeod, RJ, Einam, JP (1997) Weeds resistant to chlorsulfuron and atrazine from the north-east grain region of Australia. Weed Res 37:343–349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Lemerle, D, Mailer, R, Young, KR (2002) Influence of wild radish on yield and quality of canola. Weed Sci 50:344–349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Gill, G, Preston, C (2006) Factors affecting turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) seed germination in southern Australia. Weed Sci 54:1032–1036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CottonInfo (2014) Weedpak Weed ID Guide. Narrabri, NSW: New South Wales Department of Primary Industries. 303 pGoogle Scholar
Cousens, R, Armas, G, Baweja, R (1994) Germination of Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All. from New South Wales, Australia. Weed Res 34:127–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eslami, SV, Gill, GS, Bellotti, B, McDonald, G (2006) Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) interference in wheat. Weed Sci 54:749–756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[GRDC] Grains Research Development Corporation (2018) Growing Regions. https://grdc.com.au/about/our-industry/growing-regions. Accessed: December 15, 2018Google Scholar
Hani, M, Lebazda, R, Fenni, M (2017) Studies of morphological characteristics and production of seeds weeds of species of family Brassicaceae (cruciferous) in Setifian high plateau, Algeria. Annu Res Rev Biol 12:1–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatami, ZM, Gherekhloo, J, Rojano-Delgado, AM, Osuna, MD, Alcántara, R, Fernández, P, Sadeghipour, HR, de Prado, R (2016) Multiple mechanisms increase levels of resistance in Rapistrum rugosum to ALS herbicides. Front Plant Sci 7:169 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkpatrick, HE (1998) Factors affecting the success of California poppy (Eschscholzia californica) introduced into western Washington state. Northwest Sci 72:180–189 Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Norsworthy, JK, Mauromoustakos, A (2019) Effects of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) establishment time and distance from the crop row on biological and phenological characteristics of the weed: implications on soybean yield. Weed Sci 67:126–135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamego, FP, Ruchel, Q, Kaspary, TE, Gallon, M, Basso, CJ, e Santi, AL (2013) Competitive ability of wheat cultivars against weeds. Planta Daninha 31:521–531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, D, Luckett, DJ, Lockley, P, Koetz, E, Wu, H (2014) Competitive ability of Australian canola (Brassica napus) genotypes for weed management. Crop Pasture Sci 65:1300–1310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manalil, S, Ali, HH, Chauhan, BS (2018) Germination ecology of turnip weed (Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All.) in the northern regions of Australia. PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0201023 Google Scholar
Manalil, S, Werth, J, Jackson, R, Chauhan, BS, Preston, C (2017) An assessment of weed flora 14 years after the introduction of glyphosate-tolerant cotton in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 68:773–780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, P, Gardner, M, McMullen, G (2014) What Is Driving Flowering Time Differences of Wheat Varieties between Years. GRDC Updates. Goondiwindi, Australia: Grains Research Development Corporation Google Scholar
Mwendwa, JM, Brown, WB, Wu, H, Weston, PA, Weidenhamer, JD, Quinn, JC, Weston, LA (2018) The weed suppressive ability of selected Australian grain crops; case studies from the Riverina region in New South Wales. Crop Prot 103:9–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naderi, R, Ghadiri, H (2011) Competition of wild mustard (Sinapis arvense L.) densities with rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. J Agric Sci Technol 13:45–51 Google Scholar
Ohadi, S, Mashhadi, HR, Tavakol-Afshari, R (2011) Effects of storage and burial on germination responses of encapsulated and naked seeds of turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) to light. Weed Sci 59:483–488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J, Kristensen, L, Weiner, J (2005) Effects of density and spatial pattern of winter wheat on suppression of different weed species. Weed Sci 53:690–694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J, Kristensen, L, Weiner, J (2006) Influence of sowing density and spatial pattern of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) on the suppression of different weed species. Weed Biol Manag 6:165–173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osten, VA, Walker, SR, Storrie, A, Widderick, M, Moylan, P, Robinson, GR, Galea, K (2007) Survey of weed flora and management relative to cropping practices in the north-eastern grain region of Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 47:57–70 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, MJ, Martinez, NJ, Powles, SB (2015) Multiple herbicide-resistant wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) populations dominate Western Australian cropping fields. Crop Pasture Sci 66:1079–1085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pipan, B, Šuštar-Vozlič, J, Meglič, V (2013) Genetic differentiation among sexually compatible relatives of Brassica napus L. Genetika 45:309–327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed: February 25, 2018)Google Scholar
Reiss, A, Fomsgaard, IS, Mathiassen, SK, Stuart, RM, Kudsk, P (2018) Weed suppression by winter cereals: relative contribution of competition for resources and allelopathy. Chemoecology 28:109–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Young, BG, Bradley, KW, Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Steckel, LE, Walsh, MJ (2016) Tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seed production and retention at soybean maturity. Weed Technol 30:284–290 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Robinson, DE, Sprague, CL, Morishita, DW, Lawrence, NC, Kniss, AR, Jha, P, Felix, J, Nurse, RE, Sikkema, PH (2018) Potential yield loss in sugar beet due to weed interference in the United States and Canada. Weed Technol 32:749–753 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M, Newman, P, Powles, S (2013) Targeting weed seeds in-crop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture. Weed Technol 27:431–436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Broster, JC, Schwartz-Lazaro, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Davis, AS, Tidemann, BD, Beckie, HJ, Lyon, DJ, Soni, N, Neve, P, Bagavathiannan, MV (2018) Opportunities and challenges for harvest weed seed control in global cropping systems. Pest Manag Sci 74:2235–2245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walsh, MJ, Harrington, RB, Powles, SB (2012) Harrington Seed Destructor: a new nonchemical weed control tool for global grain crops. Crop Sci 52:1343–1347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2014) High seed retention at maturity of annual weeds infesting crop fields highlights the potential for harvest weed seed control. Weed Technol 28:486–493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werth, J, Boucher, L, Thornby, D, Walker, S, Charles, G (2013) Changes in weed species since the introduction of glyphosate-resistant cotton. Crop Pasture Sci 64:791–798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whish, JPM, Sindel, BM, Jessop, RS, Felton, WL (2002) The effect of row spacing and weed density on yield loss of chickpea. Aust J Agric Res 53:1335–1340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, BJ, Wilson, JT (1981) Effect of time of seedling emergence on seed production and time to flowering of eight weeds. Pages 35–38 in Proceedings of 6th Australian Weeds Conference. Gold Coast, QLD, Australia: Queensland Weed Society for the Council of Australian Weed Science SocietiesGoogle Scholar