Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:50:31.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference of Redroot Pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and Robust Foxtail (Setaria viridis var. robusta-alba or var. robusta-purpurea) in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. L. Orwick  and
M. M. Schreiber
P. L. Orwick
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. and Prof. Weed Sci., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
M. M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric. and Prof. Weed Sci., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and robust foxtail [Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. var. robusta-alba Schreiber (RWF) or Setaria viridis var. robusta-purpurea Schreiber (RPF)] were investigated regarding their ability to interfere with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Amsoy 71′] at different weed densities and soybean row spacing throughout two growing seasons. Final weed densities for each species tended to reach a common value because of intraspecific interference regardless of the initial density. With cultivation, a narrow soybean row spacing (38 cm) resulted in less weed growth than did a wide row spacing (76 cm) but with no cultivation, the trend was reversed. Soybeans provided less interference to foxtail than to pigweed during both growing seasons. Interference from foxtail adversely affected soybean yield components and soybean seed yield more than did pigweed interference. Water-stress conditions in 1976 increased the intensity of weed interference and reduced soybean seed yield more severely than in 1975 when moisture was adequate throughout the growing season.

Keywords

Weed densityrow spacingLAIsoybean yield componentsweed competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 6 , November 1979 , pp. 665 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. I. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.Google Scholar
2. Bergland, D. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1969. Wild mustard control in soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 24:83.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. and Juricek, C. 1968. Weed removal studies in soybeans. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 25:159–160.Google Scholar
4. Chen, T. M., Brown, R. H. and Black, C. C. 1970. CO2 compensation concentration, rate of photosynthesis, and carbonic anhydrase activity of plants. Weed Sci. 18:399–403.Google Scholar
5. Donald, C. M. 1958. The interaction of competition for light and for nutrients. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 9:421–435.Google Scholar
6. Dougherty, C. T. 1969. The influence of planting date, row spacing, and herbicides on the yield of soybeans in Canterbury. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 12:703–726.Google Scholar
7. Eaton, B. J., Feltner, K. C., and Russ, O. G. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–93.Google Scholar
8. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
9. Felton, W. L. 1976. The influence of row spacing and plant population on the effect of weed competition in soybeans (Glycine max) . Aust. J. Exp. Agric. and Animal Husb. 16:926–931.Google Scholar
10. Hatch, M. D., Slack, C. R., and Johnson, H. S. 1967. Further studies on a new pathway of photosynthetic carbon dioxide fixation in sugar cane and its occurrence in other plant species. Biochem. J. 102:417–422.Google Scholar
11. Hicks, D. R., Pendleton, J. W., Bernard, R. L., and Johnson, T. J. 1969. Response of soybean plant types to planting patterns. Agron. J. 61:290–293.Google Scholar
12. Knake, E. L. 1962. Losses caused by weeds. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 19:1.Google Scholar
13. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1962. Competition of Setaria faberi with corn and soybeans. Weeds 10:26–29.Google Scholar
14. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:281–283.Google Scholar
15. Kust, C. A. and Smith, R. R. 1969. Interaction of linuron and row spacing for control of yellow foxtail and barnyardgrass in soybeans. Weed Sci. 17:489–491.Google Scholar
16. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.Google Scholar
17. Schreiber, M. M. 1974. Growth analysis of redroot pigweed. WSSA Abstracts. p. 73.Google Scholar
18. Schreiber, M. M., Bula, R. J., Bergeson, G. B. and Jantz, O. K. 1969. Weed and nematode control in experimental field plots by soil fumigation. Down Earth 24(4):30–31.Google Scholar
19. Schreiber, M. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1971. Two new varieties of Setaria viridis . Weed Sci. 19:424–427.Google Scholar
20. Slatyer, R. O. 1970. Comparative photosynthesis, growth, and transpiration of two species of Atriplex . Planta 93:175–189.Google Scholar
21. Staniforth, D. W. 1958. Soybean-foxtail competition under varying soil moisture conditions. Agron. J. 50:13–15.Google Scholar
22. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.Google Scholar
23. Staniforth, D. W. and Weber, C. R. 1956. Effects of annual weeds on the growth and yield of soybeans. Agron. J. 48:467–471.Google Scholar
24. Waldrep, T. W. and McLaughlin, R. D. 1969. Cockelbur competition and control. The Soybean Farmer 3(3):26–27, 30.Google Scholar
25. Wax, L. M., Nave, W. R., and Cooper, R. L. 1977. Weed control in narrow and wide-row soybeans. Weed Sci. 25:73–78.Google Scholar
26. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.Google Scholar
27. Weber, C. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1957. Competitive relationships in variable weed and soybean stands. Agron. J. 49:440–444.Google Scholar
28. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.Google Scholar