Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:22:24.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interaction of Surfactant and Leaf Surface in Glyphosate Absorption

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Moritz Knoche
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824–1325
Martin J. Bukovac
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824–1325

Abstract

The effect of oxyethylene (OE) chain length of three homologous series of nonionic surfactants (allinol, nonoxynol, octoxynol) on glyphosate uptake was markedly affected by the leaf surface fine-structure of sugarbeet and kohlrabi. Adaxial leaf surfaces of sugarbeet were covered with a layer of amorphous wax, whereas the adaxial surface of kohlrabi leaves was covered with fine crystalline wax. Foliar uptake of glyphosate (1 mM glyphosate, 20 mM glycine, pH 3.2) averaged 4% for sugarbeet without surfactant, but droplets were not retained by kohlrabi leaves in the absence of a surfactant. Glyphosate absorption with octoxynol (9 to 10 OE units, 0.5 g L−1) was rapid initially (0 to 2 h) and leveled off about 2 h after application in both species. Absorption by sugarbeet decreased from 12 to 3% as OE content of octoxynol was increased from 5 to 30 OE units. In contrast, surfactants of intermediate OE content (octoxynol, 16 OE units) induced the greatest uptake (17%) on kohlrabi. Leaf wetting was markedly affected by surfactant and leaf surface. As OE content of octoxynol increased from 5 to 30 OE units, droplet/leaf interface areas of 1-μl droplets decreased from 4 to 3 mm2 on the adaxial leaf surface of sugarbeet and from 61 to 2 mm2 on kohlrabi. Concurrently, the rate of droplet evaporation (1 μl) decreased from 1.0 to 0.7 nl s−1 on sugarbeet and 4.2 to 0.5 nl s−1 on kohlrabi leaves. The effect of OE content on enhancement of glyphosate uptake and wetting characteristics of spray solutions was similar within species for different hydrophobic moieties but differed markedly between species.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bayer, D. E. and Lumb, J. M. 1973. Penetration and translocation of herbicides. Pages 387439 in Van Valkenburg, W., ed. Pesticide Formulations. Marcel-Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
2. Flore, J. A. and Bukovac, M. J. 1974. Pesticide effects on the plant cuticle: I. Response of Brassica oleracea (L.) to EPTC as indexed by epicuticular wax production. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 99:3437.Google Scholar
3. Geyer, R. and Schönherr, J. 1988. In vitro test for effects of surfactants and formulations on plant cuticles. Pages 2233 in Cross, B. and Scher, H. B., eds. Pesticide Formulations—Innovations and Developments. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
4. Greene, D. W. and Bukovac, M. J. 1974. Stomatal penetration: Effect of surfactants and role in foliar absorption. Am. J. Bot. 61:100106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holloway, P. J. 1970. Surface factors affecting the wetting of leaves. Pestic. Sci. 1:156163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Holloway, P. J. and Silcox, D. 1985. Behavior of three nonionic surfactants following foliar application. Pages 297302 in Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1985.Google Scholar
7. Holloway, P. J. and Stock, D. 1990. Factors affecting the activation of foliar uptake of agrochemicals by surfactants. Pages 303337 in Karsa, D. R., ed. Industrial Applications of Surfactants II. Special Publ. No. 77. Royal Soc. Chem., Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
8. Hull, H. M., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Action of adjuvants on plant surfaces. Pages 2667 in Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
9. Knoche, M. and Bukovac, M. J. 1991. Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants: IX. Effect of oxyethylene chain length on GA3 absorption by sour cherry leaves. J. Plant Growth Regul. 10:173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Knoche, M., Noga, G., and Lenz, F. 1992. Surfactant induced phytotoxicity: Evidence for interaction with epicuticular wax fine structure. Crop Prot. 11:5156.Google Scholar
11. Mack, G. L. 1936. The determination of contact angles from measurements of the dimensions of small bubbles and drops. J. Phys. Chem. 40:159167.Google Scholar
12. Prasad, R., Foy, C. L., and Craft, A. S. 1967. Effect of relative humidity on absorption and translocation of foliarly applied dalapon. Weeds 15:149156.Google Scholar
13. Price, C. E. and Anderson, N. H. 1985. Uptake of chemicals from foliar deposits: Effects of plant species and molecular structure. Pestic. Sci. 16:369377.Google Scholar
14. Rosen, M. J. 1989. Wetting and its modification by surfactants. Pages 240245 in Surfactants and Interfacial Phenomena. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
15. Schönherr, J. and Bukovac, M. J. 1970. Preferential polar pathways in the cuticle and their relationship to ectodesmata. Planta 109:7393.Google Scholar
16. Schönherr, J. and Bukovac, M. J. 1972. Penetration of stomata by liquids. Dependence on surface tension, wettability and stomatal morphology. Plant Physiol. 49:813819.Google Scholar
17. Shafer, W. E. and Bukovac, M. J. 1989. Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants. 7. Effects of Triton X-100 on sorption of 2-(1-naphthyl)acetic acid by tomato fruit cuticles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 37:486492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Shafer, W. E., Bukovac, M. J., and Fader, R. G. 1987. Sorption of polyethoxylated surfactants and their effects on NAA sorption by plant cuticles. Pages 3950 in Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Vol. II. Mode of Action and Physiological Activity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
19. Silcox, D. and Holloway, P. J. 1986. A simple method for the removal and assessment of foliar deposits of agrochemicals using cellulose acetate film stripping. Pages 1317 in Aspects of Applied Biology 11, Biochemical and Physiological Techniques in Herbicide Research. Assoc. Appl. Biol., Nottingham, Trent Polytechnic.Google Scholar
20. Steurbaut, W., Melkebeke, G., and Dejonckheere, W. 1987. The influence of nonionic surfactants on the penetration and transport of systemic fungicides in plants. Pages 93103 in Chow, P.N.P., Grant, C. A., Hinshalwood, A. M., and Simundsson, E., eds. Adjuvants and Agrochemicals. Vol. I. Mode of Action and Physiological Activity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
21. Stevens, P.J.G. and Baker, E. A. 1987. Factors affecting the foliar absorption and redistribution of pesticides. 1. Properties of leaf surfaces and their interactions with spray droplets. Pestic. Sci. 19:265281.Google Scholar
22. Stevens, P.J.G. and Bukovac, M. J. 1987. Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants. Part 1: Effects of oxyethylene content on properties of potential relevance to foliar absorption. Pestic. Sci. 20:1935.Google Scholar
23. Stevens, P.J.G. and Bukovac, M. J. 1987. Studies on octylphenoxy surfactants. Part 2: Effects on foliar uptake and translocation. Pestic. Sci. 20:3752.Google Scholar
24. Zabkiewicz, J. A., Coupland, D., and Ede, F. 1988. Effects of surfactants on droplet drying rates in relation to foliar uptake. Pages 7789 in Cross, B. and Scher, H. B., eds. Pesticide Formulations—Innovations and Developments. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Zisman, W. A. 1964. Relation of equilibrium contact angle to liquid and solid constitution. Pages 151 in Gould, R. F., ed. Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.Google Scholar