Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T08:38:44.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating Herbicide Programs with Harvest Weed Seed Control and Other Fall Management Practices for the Control of Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Nicholas E. Korres ,
Michael J. Walsh  and
Stephen B. Powles
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, 72704 AR
Nicholas E. Korres*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, 72704 AR
Michael J. Walsh
Affiliation:
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (AHRI), School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6009, Australia
Stephen B. Powles
Affiliation:
Australian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (AHRI), School of Plant Biology, University of Western Australia, Perth WA 6009, Australia
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A large-plot field experiment was conducted at Keiser, AR, from fall of 2010 through fall of 2013 to understand to what extent soybean in-crop herbicide programs and postharvest fall management practices impact Palmer amaranth population density and seed production over three growing seasons. The effect of POST-only (glyphosate-only) or PRE followed by (fb) POST (glyphosate or glufosinate) + residual herbicide treatments were evaluated alone and in combination with postharvest management options of soybean residue spreading or soil incorporation, use of cover crops, windrowing with/without burning, and residue removal. Significant differences were observed between fall management practices on Palmer amaranth population density each fall. The use of cover crops and residue collection and removal fb the incorporation of crop residues into soil during the formation of beds were the most effective practices in reducing Palmer amaranth population. In contrast, the effects of fall management practices on Palmer amaranth seed production were inconsistent among years. The inclusion of a PRE herbicide application into the herbicide program significantly reduced Palmer amaranth population density and subsequent seed production each year when compared to the glyphosate-only program. Additionally, the glufosinate-containing residual program was superior to the glyphosate-containing residual program in reducing Palmer amaranth seed production. PRE fb POST herbicides resulted in significant decreases in the Palmer amaranth population density and seed production compared to POST application of glyphosate alone for all fall management practices, including the no-till practice. This study demonstrated that crop residue management such as chaff removal from the field, the use of cover crops, or seed incorporation during bed formation in combination with an effective PRE plus POST residual herbicide program is important for optimizing in-season management of Palmer amaranth and subsequently reducing the population density, which has a profound impact on lessening the risk for herbicide resistance and the consistency and effectiveness of future weed management efforts.

Keywords

GlufosinateglyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.soybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrCover cropscrop residuefall managementglufosinateglyphosateharvest weed seed controlPalmer amaranthseed production
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 540 - 550
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Chris Preston, University of Adelaide.

References

Literature Cited

Akemo, MC, Regnier, EE, Bennett, MA (2000) Weed suppression in spring-sown rye (Secale cereale) pea (Pisum sativum) cover crop mixes. Weed Technol 14: 545–549 Google Scholar
Amuri, N, Brye, KR, Gbur, EE, Oliver, D, Kelley, J (2010) Weed populations as affected by residue management practices in a wheat–soybean double-crop production system. Weed Sci 58: 234–243 Google Scholar
Anonymous (undated) Managing downy brome under conservation tillage systems in the Northwest cropping region. In Pacific Northwest Conservation Tillage Handbook. A Pacific Northwest Cooperative Extension Publication, Washington, Oregon, Idaho. http://pnwsteep.wsu.edu/tillagehandbook/chapter5/pnw0509.htm. Accessed December 16, 2015 Google Scholar
Armengot, L, Berner, A, Blanco-Moreno, J, Mader, P, Sans, FX (2015) Long-term feasibility of reduced tillage in organic farming. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 339–346 Google Scholar
Bates, RT, Gallagher, RS, Curran, WS, Harper, JK (2012) Integrating mechanical and reduced chemical weed control in conservation tillage corn. Agron J 104: 507–517 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Leeson, JY, Thomas, AG, Hall, LM, Brenzil, CA (2008) Risk assessment of weed resistance in the Canadian prairies. Weed Technol 22: 741–746 Google Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Moyer, JR, Doram, RC, Bosweell, AL (2001) Yellow sweet clover, green manure, and its residues effectively suppress weed during fallow. Weed Sci 49: 406–413 Google Scholar
Bryson, CT, Hanks, JE (2006) Weed Populations in Conventional and Conservation Tillage Management Cotton and Soybean Systems. Mississippi Agricultural & Forestry Experiment Station, Research Report Vol. 23, No. 18. Stoneville, MS: Mississippi State University. 5 pGoogle Scholar
Chahal, PS, Aulakh, JS, Jugulam, M, Jhala, AJ (2015) Herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) in the United States: mechanisms of resistance, impact, and management. Pages 1–29 in Price, A, Kelton, J, Sarunaite, L eds. Herbicides, Agronomic Crops and Weed Biology. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Google Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Abugho, SB (2013) Effect of crop residue on seedling emergence and growth of selected weed species in a sprinkler-irrigated zero-till dry-seeded rice system. Weed Sci 61: 403–409 Google Scholar
Crow, WD, Steckel, LE, Hayes, RM, Mueller, TC (2015) Evaluation of POST-harvest herbicide applications for seed prevention of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Technol 29: 405–411 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Kichler, J, Sosnoskie, L, York, A, Sammons, D, Nichols, B (2010) Integrating cover crop residue and moldboard plowing into glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth management programs. In Proceedings of the 2010 Beltwide Cotton Conference. Cordova, TN: National Cotton Council of America. 1531 pGoogle Scholar
Devenish, KL, Leaver, LJ (2000) The fate of ryegrass seed when sheep graze chaff cart heaps. Asian-Aus J Anim Sci 13 (Suppl):484. Available at: http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/2000/Devenish_0631.pdf. Accessed March 15, 2016Google Scholar
DeVore, JD, Norsworthy, JK, Brye, KR (2013) Influence of deep tillage, a rye cover crop, and various soybean production systems on Palmer amaranth emergence in soybean. Weed Technol 27: 263–270 Google Scholar
Fogelfors, H (1982) Collection of chaff, awns and straw when combining and its influence on the seed bank and the composition of the weed flora. Pages 339–345 in Weeds and Weed Control: 23rd Swedish Weed Conference. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Plant Husbandry and Research Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Science Google Scholar
Haramoto, ER, Gallandt, ER (2004) Brassica cover cropping for weed management: a review. Renew Agr Food Syst 19: 187–198 Google Scholar
Harker, KN, O'Donovan, JT (2013) Recent weed control, weed management, and integrated weed management. Weed Technol 27: 1–11 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed March 15, 2016Google Scholar
Holding, D, Lemerle, D, Stewart, V, Walsh, M (2014) Tactics for managing weed populations (Section 4). Pages 31–235 in Storrie, AM, ed. Integrated Weed Management in Australian Cropping Systems. Canberra, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation Google Scholar
Kleemann, S, Preston, C, Gill, G (undated) Harvest Weed Seed Control: Narrow Windrow Burning. The University of Adelaide, Hart Field-Site Group. http://www.hartfieldsite.org.au/media/2014%20Trial%20Results/2014_Results_Harvest_weed_seed_control_narrow_windrow_burning.pdf. Accessed March 24, 2016 Google Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42: 523–527 Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Froud-Williams, RJ (2002) Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora. Weed Res 42: 417–428 Google Scholar
Korres, NE, Norsworthy, JK (2015) Influence of a rye cover crop on the critical period for weed control in cotton. Weed Sci 63: 346–352 Google Scholar
Kruidhof, HM, Bastiaans, L, Kropff, MJ (2008) Ecological weed management by cover cropping: effects on weed growth in autumn and weed establishment in spring. Weed Res 48: 492–502 Google Scholar
Liebl, R, Simmons, FW, Wax, LM, Stoller, EW (1992) Effects of rye (Secale cereale) mulch on weed control and soil moisture in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 6: 838–846 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, R, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J Jr (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49: 202–208 Google Scholar
Morgan, GD, Bauman, PA, Chandler, JM (2001) Competitive impact of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technol 15: 408–412 Google Scholar
Neve, P, Norsworthy, JK, Smith, KL, Zelaya, IA (2011) Modelling glyphosate resistance management strategies for Palmer amaranth in cotton. Weed Technol 25: 335–343 Google Scholar
Neyman, JS, Dabrowska, DM, Speed, TP (1990) On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9. Statistical Sci 5: 332–338 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, G, Griffin, T, Gbur, EE (2014) In-field movement of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and its impact on cotton lint yield: evidence for a zero threshold. Weed Sci 62: 237–249 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci (Special Issue) 60: 31–62 Google Scholar
Owen, MDK (2008) Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Manag Sci 64: 377–387 Google Scholar
Price, AJ, Balkcom, KS, Culpepper, SA, Kelton, JA, Nichols, RL, Schomberg, H (2011) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth: a threat to conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 66: 265–275 Google Scholar
Rankins, A Jr Byrd, JD Jr Mask, DB, Barnett, JW, Gerard, PD (2005) Survey of soybean weeds in Mississippi. Weed Technol 19: 492–498 Google Scholar
Reed, JD, Keeling, JW, Dotray, PA (2014) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) management in GlyTol LibertyLink cotton. Weed Technol 28: 592–600 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Bond, JA (2013a) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Midsouthern United States cotton: a following-up survey. Weed Technol 27: 778–787 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Steckel, LE, Stephenson, DO, Eubank, TW, Scott, RC (2013b) Assessment of weed management practices and problem weeds in the Midsouth United States soybean: a consultant's perspective. Weed Technol 27: 612–622 Google Scholar
Rowland, MW, Murray, DS, Verhalen, LM (1999) Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 47: 305–309 Google Scholar
Scaboo, AM, Chen, P, Sleper, DA, Clark, KM (2010) Classical breeding and genetics of soybean. Pages 19–55 in Bilyeu, K, Ratnaparkhe, MB, Kole, C, eds. Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Soybean. Series on Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Crop Plants. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Google Scholar
Schomberg, HH, McDaniel, RG, Mallard, E, Endale, DM, Fisher, DS, Cabrera, ML (2006) Conservation tillage and cover crop influences on cotton production on a southeastern U.S. coastal plain soil. Agron J 98: 1247–1256 Google Scholar
Schwartz, LM, Norsworthy, JK, Young, BG, Bradley, KW, Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Steckel, LE, Walsh, MJ (2016) Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seed production and retention at soybean harvest. Weed Technol 30: 284–290 Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, SJ, Entz, MH (2005) Chaff collection reduces seed dispersal of wild oat (Avena fatua) by a combine harvester. Weed Sci 53: 465–470 Google Scholar
Skroch, WA, Powell, MA, Bilderback, TE, Henry, PH (1992) Mulches: durability, aesthetic value, weed control and temperature. J Environ Hort 10: 43–45 Google Scholar
Sparks, OC, Barrentine, JL, Burgos, NR, McClelland, MR (2003) Effect of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) seedbank density on the performance of pendimethalin and fluometuron. Summaries of Arkansas Cotton Research 2003. AAES Research Series 521: 167–172 Google Scholar
Storrie, AM, ed (2014) Integrated Weed Management in Australian Cropping Systems. Canberra, Australia: Grains Research and Development Corporation. 386 pGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1996) Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable systems. J Prod Agric 9: 475–479 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Mohler, CL (1993) Light transmittance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron J 85: 673–680 Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Newman, P (2007) Burning narrow windrows for weed seed destruction. Field Crops Res 104: 24–30 Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Newman, P, Powles, SB (2013) Targeting weed seeds in-crop: a new weed control paradigm for global agriculture. Weed Technol 27: 431–436 Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2004) Herbicide resistance: an imperative for smarter crop weed management. Pages 1–6 in Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, Australia: The Regional Institute Ltd Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2007) Management strategies for herbicide-resistant weed populations in Australian dryland crop production systems. Weed Technol 21: 332–338 Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): a review. Weed Technol 27: 12–27 Google Scholar
Watson, GW (1988) Organic mulch and grass competition influence tree root development. J Arboriculture 14: 200–203 Google Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS (2010) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in soybean with glyphosate and conventional herbicide systems. Weed Technol 24: 403–410 Google Scholar