Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:36:19.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Weed Management Systems Technology for Pest Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

W. C. Shaw
W. C. Shaw*
Affiliation:
National Res. Program Leader, National Program Staff, Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD 20705
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The people of the world required from the dawn of time until 1830 to reach a population of 1 billion. By 1960, we reached 3 billion and by 1980 we had a population of about 4 billion. It is estimated that by the year 2000 there will be 7 billion people in the world. Just 30 yr from now the world's population will have doubled. This means that within the next 30 yr we must produce as much food as we have produced since the beginning of history. Can we feed this many people? Yes, but expanded research to develop improved technology will be required to meet the challenge.

Type
Other
Information
Weed Science , Volume 30 , Issue S1: Supplement 1: Integrated Weed Management Systems Technology for Crop Production and Protection. Proceedings of a Symposium of the Weed Science Society of America. February 19, 1981. Las Vegas, Nevada , 1982 , pp. 2 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected Bibliography

1. Andrilenas, P. A. 1974. Farmer's use of pesticides in 1971 – Quantities. Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 252. Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 56 pp.Google Scholar
2. Andrilenas, P. A. 1975. Farmers' use of pesticides in 1971 – Extent of crop use. Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 268. Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 24 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bennett, I. L. Jr. 1967. The World Food Problem. A Report of the President's Science Advisory Committee. Supt. of Doc., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, DC. Vol I, 127 pp; Vol II, 772 pp; Vol III, 332 pp. Google Scholar
4. Bergland, R. S. 1977. USDA policy on management of pest problems. Secretary's Memo. No. 1929. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 3 pp.Google Scholar
5. Bertrand, A. R. 1978. Pesticide management and regulation issues. Regulatory Forum, Natl. Agric. Chem. Assoc. Mtg., Sept. 25, 1978, White Sulphur Springs, WV. Sci. Ed. Admin. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 8 pp.Google Scholar
6. Bertrand, A. R. 1980. SEA Integrated Pest Management programs. Sci. Ed. Admin. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 69 pp.Google Scholar
7. Blake, H. T. and Andrilenas, P. A. 1975. Farmers' use of pesticides in 1971 – expenditures. Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 296. Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 42 pp.Google Scholar
8. Butz, E. L. 1975. 100 Years of responsible technology, USDA 3237–75 (4984). U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 8 pp.Google Scholar
9. Byerly, T. C. 1968. A national program of research for environmental quality–pollution in relation to agriculture and forestry. A Report of a Joint Task Force of the U.S. Dep. Agric. and the State Univ. and Land-Grant Coll. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 111 pp.Google Scholar
10. Ennis, W. B. Jr., Dowler, W. M., and Klassen, W. 1975. Crop protection to increase food supplies. Science 188:593–598.Google Scholar
11. Ennis, W. B. Jr., Shaw, W. C., Danielson, L. L., Klingman, D. L., and Timmons, F. L. 1963. Impact of chemical weed control on farm management practices. Adv. Agron. 15:161–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Exp. Stn. Comm. on Organization and Policy. 1979. Integrated Pest Management. A program of reseach for the state agricultural experiment stations and colleges of 1980. Coop. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Washington, DC. 190 pp.Google Scholar
13. Ext. Comm. on Organization and Policy. 1979. IPM programs for the state cooperative extension services. Ala. Coop. Ext. Serv., Auburn University, Auburn, AL.Google Scholar
14. Ferguson, W. L. 1975. Farmers' expenditures for custom pesticide services. 1971. Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 314. Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 31 pp.Google Scholar
15. Fox, A. S., Jenkins, R. P., Holstun, J. T. Jr., and Klingman, D. L. 1971. Economic impact of banning the domestic use of 2,4,5-T. Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 199. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 21 pp.Google Scholar
16. Fowler, D. L. and Mahan, J. N. 1978. The pesticide review, 1978. Agric. Stabilization and Conservation Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. Washington, DC. 42 pp.Google Scholar
17. Freeman, O. L. and Bennett, I. L. Jr. 1969. Control of agriculture-related pollution. A report to the President, submitted by The Secretary of Agriculture and The Director, Office of Science and Technology. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 102 pp.Google Scholar
18. Good, J. M. 1978. Developing, planning, and coordinating IPM programs. Proc. Soc. Nematologists Mtg., Hot Springs, AR, Aug. 7. Ext., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
19. Handbook of Agricultural Charts. 1977. Agric. Hdbk. No. 524. U.S. Dep. Agric. Supt. of Doc., U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, DC. 125 pp.Google Scholar
20. Hawkins, D. E., Slife, F. W., and Swanson, E. R. 1977. Economic analysis of herbicide use in various crop sequences. Ill. Agric. Econ. 17(1).Google Scholar
21. Irving, G. W. Jr. 1970. Agricultural pest control. Science 168: 1419–1424.Google Scholar
22. Irving, G. W. Jr. and LeClerg, E. L. 1965. Losses in agriculture. Agric. Hdbk. No. 291. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 120 pp.Google Scholar
23. Jansen, L. L. 1972. Extent and cost of weed control with herbicides and an evaluation of important weeds. 1968. ARS-H-1. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 227 pp.Google Scholar
24. Klassen, W. 1975. Pest managment–organization and resources for implementation. Pages 227–256 in Insects, Science, and Society. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
25. Knake, E. L. 1978. The weed science phase of pest management. Dep. Agron., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana. 8 pp.Google Scholar
26. Office of Technology Assessment. 1979. Pest management strategies in crop protection. Vol. I and II. Congress of the United States. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
27. Shaw, W. C. 1964. Weed science–revolution in agricultural technology. Weed Sci. 12:153–162.Google Scholar
28. Shaw, W. C. 1971. How agricultural chemicals contribute to our current food supplies. Proc. Symp. Agric. Chem.–harmony or discord for food, people, and the environment, sponsored by the Univ. of Calif. Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD. 19 pp.Google Scholar
29. Shaw, W. C. 1974. Total farm weed control concepts for pest management. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD. 15 pp.Google Scholar
30. Shaw, W. C., Hilton, J. L., Moreland, D. E., and Jansen, L. L. 1960. Fate of herbicides in plants. Pages 119–133 in The Nature and Fate of Chemicals Applied to Soils, Plants, and Animals. ARS 20–9. Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 221 pp.Google Scholar
31. Shaw, W. C., Agric. Res. Serv. and Cooperating State Weed Sci. 1976. Agricultural Research Service, National Research Program, ARS-NRP 20280, Weed Control Technology for Protecting Crops, Grazing Lands, Aquatic Sites, and Noncropland Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD. 185 pp.Google Scholar
32. Shaw, W. C. and Jansen, L. L. 1972. Chemical weed control strategies for the future. Pages 197–215 in Proc. Symp. Pest Control Strategies for the Future. Natl. Acad. Sci. ISBNO-309-01945-1. Washington, DC. 376 pp.Google Scholar
33. Slife, F. W. 1979. Weed control systems in the corn belt states. Proc. Second World Soybean Res. Conf., Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
34. Slife, F. W. and Wax, L. M. 1976. Weed and herbicide management. Proc. First World Soybean Res. Conf., Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
35. Upchurch, L. P. and Heisig, C. P. 1964. The economic importance of pesticides to the U.S. consumer. Econ. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, DC. 6 pp.Google Scholar