Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:54:20.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inhibition of Plant Acetolactate Synthase by Nicosulfuron, Rimsulfuron, and Their Mixture DPX-79406

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mounir Mekki
Affiliation:
Dep. Phytologie, Univ. Laval, Ste-Foy, Qc, G1K 7P4, Canada
Gilles D. Leroux
Affiliation:
Dep. Phytologie, Univ. Laval, Ste-Foy, Qc, G1K 7P4, Canada

Abstract

Nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron are two selective postemergence sulfonylurea herbicides commercialized, respectively, in Europe and USA for weed control in maize. They are under development in Canada as a 1:1 premix (DPX-79406). The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of these herbicides and their interactions on acetolactate synthase (ALS) activity of selected annual weed species. Each nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron treatment used over a concentration range of 0.01 to 10 μM produced a distinct pattern of ALS inhibition for common ragweed, proso millet, redroot pigweed, smooth crabgrass, and wild oats. Based on ALS specific activity, I50 values for each herbicide differed slightly among the five weed species. However, rimsulfuron was much more inhibitory to ALS than was nicosulfuron. Common ragweed ALS activity increased linearly from 30 to 120 min, even in the continual presence of both herbicides in the assay buffer. This suggests the reversibility of their interaction with ALS. Delaying nicosulfuron (1 μM) or rimsulfuron (0.1 μM) additions to the assay buffer, after initiating the reaction with the enzyme, resulted in a quadratic increase of common ragweed ALS activity. In the continual presence of 0.1 μM of rimsulfuron, addition of 0.1 or 1 μM nicosulfuron did not affect ALS activity any further. However, in the continual presence of 0.1 μM of nicosulfuron, delaying rimsulfuron addition caused an increase in ALS activity. This increase was lower in the presence of 1 μM of nicosulfuron. Inhibition of common ragweed ALS by nicosulfuron and rimsulfuron was not independent of each other, suggesting some competition between the two herbicides for a common binding site on ALS.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. DPX-79406: Experimental Herbicide for Corn. Technical Information. E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc., Agricultural Products Dep., Wilmington, DE. 5 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. DPX-V9360: Experimental Herbicide for Corn. Technical Bulletin. E.I. duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc., Agricultural Products Dep., Wilmington, DE. 6 pp.Google Scholar
3. Babczinski, P. and Zelinski, T. 1991. Mode of action of herbicidal ALS-inhibitors on acetolactate synthase from green plant cell cultures, yeast and Escherichia coli . Pestic. Sci. 31:305323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Devine, M. D., Maries, M. A. S., and Hall, L. M. 1991. Inhibition of acetolactate synthase in susceptible and resistant biotypes of Stellaria media . Pestic. Sci. 31:273280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Durner, J. and Böger, P. 1989. Inhibition of purified acetolactate synthase from barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) by chlorsulfuron and imazaquin. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Monogr. 42:8384.Google Scholar
6. Durner, J., Gailus, V., and Böger, P. 1991. New aspects on inhibition of plant acetolactate synthase by chlorsulfuron and imazaquin. Plant Physiol. 95:11441149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Hatzios, K. K. and Penner, D. 1985. Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev. Weed Sci. 1:163.Google Scholar
8. Hawkes, T. R., Howard, J. L., and Pontin, S. 1989. Herbicides that inhibit the biosynthesis of branched chain amino acids. Pages 113137 in Dodge, A. D., ed. Herbicides and Plant Metabolism. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
9. LaRossa, R. A., and Schloss, J. V. 1984. The sulfonylurea herbicide sulfometuron methyl is an extremely potent and selective inhibitor of acetolactate synthase in Salmonella typhimurium . J. Biol. Chem. 259:87538757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Mekki, M. and Leroux, G. D. 1994. Activity of nicosulfuron, rimsulfuron, and seven weed species. Weed Technol. (in press).Google Scholar
11. Monks, D. W., Mullins, C. A., and Johnson, K. E. 1992. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:280283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Morrison, J. F. and Walsh, C. T. 1988. The behavior and significance of slow-binding enzyme inhibitors. Pages 201301 in Meister, A., ed. Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology. Vol. 61. John Wiley and Sons, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1991. Effect of DPX-V9360 and terbufos on field and sweet corn (Zea mays) under three environments. Weed Technol. 5:130136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Muhitch, M. J., Shaner, D. L., and Stidham, M. A. 1987. Imidazolinones and acetohydroxyacid synthase from higher plants. Plant Physiol. 83:451456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Ray, T. B. 1984. Site of action of chlorsulfuron: Inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol. 75:827831.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Ray, T. B. 1985. The site of action of the sulfonylurea herbicides. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 1:131138.Google Scholar
17. Reinke, H., Rosenzweig, A., Claus, J., Kreidi, M., Chisholm, C., and Jensen, P. 1991. DPX-E9636, Experimental sulfonylurea herbicide for potatoes. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 3:445450.Google Scholar
18. SAS Institute, Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT® User's Guide. Version 6. 4th ed. Vol. 2. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. 846 pp.Google Scholar
19. Schloss, J. V. 1990. Acetolactate synthase, mechanism of action and its herbicide binding site. Pestic. Sci. 29:283292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Singh, B., Szamosi, I., Hand, J. M., and Misra, R. 1992. Arabidopsis acetohydroxyacid synthase expressed in Escherichia coli is insensitive to the feedback inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 99:812816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Singh, B. K., Stidham, M. A., and Shaner, D. L. 1988. Assay of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Anal. Biochem. 171:173179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Smith, J. K., Schloss, J. V. and Mazur, B. J. 1989. Functional expression of plant acetolactate synthase genes in Escherichia coli . Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86:41794183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
24. Streibig, J. C. 1981. A method for determining the biological effect of herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci. 29:469473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Umbarger, H. E. 1969. Regulation of amino metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 38:323370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Walsh, C. 1979. Pages 688689 in Enzymatic Reaction Mechanisms. 1st ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, CA. 978 pp.Google Scholar
27. Westerfield, W. W. 1945. A colorimetric determination of blood acetoin. J. Biol. Chem. 161:495502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Wiersma, P. A., Hachey, J. E., Crosby, W. L., and Moloney, M. M. 1990. Specific truncations of an acetolactate synthase gene from Brassica napus efficiently complement ilvB/ilvH mutants of Salmonella typhimurium . Mol. Gen. Genet. 224:155159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar