Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T04:18:06.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inhibition of Glyphosate Phytotoxicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

P. W. Stahlman  and
W. M. Phillips
P. W. Stahlman
Affiliation:
Fort Hays Branch, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Hays, KS 67601
W. M. Phillips
Affiliation:
Fort Hays Branch, Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Hays, KS 67601
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Effects of seven herbicides and two herbicide formulations on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate {[N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine]} were studied in the greenhouse. All herbicide formulations tested reduced glyphosate toxicity; the degree of reduction among herbicides varied. Type of formulation did not alter the reducing effects of propazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] or propachlor (2-chloro-N-isopropylacetanilide). Liquid formulations of cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazin-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropionitrile} and linuron [3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1-methoxy-1-methylurea] caused less reduction than the wettable powder formulations, but the liquid formulation of atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine] caused greater reduction than the wettable powder. Inert ingredients of the herbicide formulations were primarily responsible for reduced glyphosate toxicity.

Keywords

Formulationinert ingredientswettable powdertank mixtures
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 1979 , pp. 575 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P. and Somabhi, Montien. 1978. Antagonistic effect of atrazine and simazine on glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 26:135–139.Google Scholar
2. Baird, D. D., Upchurch, R. P., Homesley, W. B., and Franz, J. E. 1971. Introduction of a new broadspectrum postemergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:64–68.Google Scholar
3. Gates, C. E. and Bilbro, J. D. 1978. Illustration of a cluster analysis method for mean separation. Agron. J. 70:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Rieck, C. E., Wright, T. H., and Harper, T. R. 1974. Fate of glyphosate in soil. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. pp. 119–120.Google Scholar
5. Scott, A. J. and Knott, M. 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30:507–512.Google Scholar
6. Stahlman, P. W. and Phillips, W. M. 1979. Effects of water quality and spray volume on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 27:38–41.Google Scholar