Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T11:17:08.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Time of Emergence on the Growth and Development of Wild Oat (Avena fatua)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jing Dai ,
Jochum J. Wiersma ,
Krishona L. Martinson  and
Beverly R. Durgan
Jing Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Jochum J. Wiersma*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Krishona L. Martinson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
Beverly R. Durgan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Successful control of wild oat in cereal crops requires an accurate prediction of the developmental stages of wild oat plants that emerged during the growing season. The main objective of this research was to evaluate wild oat growth and to predict the phyllochron of wild oat plants that emerge at various times in the Red River Valley region of Minnesota and North Dakota. Field experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 in Crookston, MN, and Fargo, ND. Four emergence cohorts were established in 4 successive wk. Research plots were arranged in randomized complete blocks with six replications. From the naturally emerged wild oat population, 10 randomly selected plants per plot were evaluated for plant height, leaves on main stem, tillers per plant, total leaves per plant, days to flag leaf emergence and to heading, biomass per plant, and seeds per plant. Haun's numerical cereal development scale was regressed on days after emergence (DAE), day length (DL), growing degree days (GDD), or photothermal units (PTU). Wild oats that emerged first required more time for flag leaf emergence and heading, were taller, and had more biomass, leaves, tillers, and seed production than wild oat plants that emerged later. Wild oat phyllochron intervals were 5.3 d, 94 GDD, or 1,468 PTU, regardless of emergence timing. These data suggest that wild oat phyllochron is primarily driven by air temperature and is relatively stable during the extended emergence period. Later-emerging wild oat plants, although not as competitive as earlier emerging ones, still have the potential to contribute to the seed bank if left uncontrolled.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua L. AVEFAGrowing degree daysphotothermal unitsphyllochron
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 60 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 389 - 393
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adkins, S. W., Loewen, M., and Symons, S. J. 1987. Variation within pure lines of wild oats (Avena fatua) in relation to temperature of development. Weed Sci. 35:169–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. K. and Gallagher, J. N. 1983. The development of winter wheat in the field, 2: the control of primordium initiation rate by temperature and photoperiod. J. Agric. Sci. 101:337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, D. A., Klepper, B., and Rydrych, D. J. 1995. Comparative above-ground development rates for several annual grass weeds and cereal grains. Weed Sci. 43:410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, A., Frank, A. B., and Black, A. L. 1984. Estimation of spring wheat leaf growth rates and anthesis from air temperature. Agron. J. 76:829–835.Google Scholar
Behrens, R. and Strand, O. E. 1979. Survey of Wild Oat and Other Weeds in Small Grains in Minnesota. St. Paul, MN University of Minnesota Extension Service. 254 p.Google Scholar
Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N. C. B. 1972. Germination periodicity, plant survival and seed production in populations of Avena fatua L. growing in spring barley. Pages 218–225 in Proceedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference. Alton, Hampshire, U.K. British Crop Protection Council.Google Scholar
Cousens, R., Weaver, S. E., Martin, T. D., Blair, A. M., and Wilson, J. 1991. Dynamics of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and winter cereals. Weed Res. 39:203–210.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Corbett, C. J., and Bendixen, W. E. 1989. Developmental rates of wild oats (Avena fatua) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 37:521–524.Google Scholar
Delecolle, R., Hay, R. K. M., Guerif, M., Pluchard, P., and Varlet-Grancher, C. 1989. A method of describing the progress of apical development in wheat, based on the time-course of organogenesis. Field Crops Res. 21:147–160.Google Scholar
Frank, A. B. and Ries, R. E. 1990. Effect of soil water, nitrogen, and growing degree-days on morphological development of crested and western wheatgrass. J. Range Man. 43(3):257–260.Google Scholar
Frank, A. B., Berdahl, J. D., and Barker, R. E. 1985. Morphological development and water use in clonal lines of four forage grasses. Crop Sci. 25:339–344.Google Scholar
Haun, J. R. 1973. Visual quantification of wheat development. Agron. J. 65:116–119.Google Scholar
Imam, I. G. and Allard, R. W. 1965. Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species, VI: genetic variability between and within natural populations of wild oats from differing habitats in California. Genetics. 51:49–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinson, K., Durgan, B., Forcella, F., Wiersma, J., Spokas, K., and Archer, D. 2007. An emergence model for wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 55:584–591.Google Scholar
McMaster, G. S. and Wilhelm, W. W. 1995. Accuracy of equations predicting the phyllochron of wheat. Crop Sci. 35:30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., and Mulder, C. E. C. 1982. Morphological and physiological variation in wild oat. Agron. J. 74:771–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K. J. and Moser, L. E. 1995. Quantifying development morphology of perennial grasses. Crop Sci. 35:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, L. A. and Gealy, D. R. 1983. Growth characteristics of wild oat (Avena fatua) in the Pacific Northwest. Weed Sci. 31:226–229.Google Scholar
Nuttonson, M. Y. 1948. Some preliminary observations of phenological data as a tool in the study of photoperiod and thermal requirements of various plant materials. Pages 29–143 in Murneek, A. E. and Whyte, R. O., eds. Vernalization and Photoperiodism—A Symposium. Waltham, MA Chronica Botanica.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 32:498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] SAS Institute. 2009. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 9.2. Cary, NC SAS.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P. and Vanden Born, W. H. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds, 27: Avena Fatua L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:141–157.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P., McBeath, D. K., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Studies of the biology of wild oat, I: dormancy, germination and emergence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:611–618.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. P., McBeath, D. K., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1977. Studies of the biology of wild oat, II: growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:811–817.Google Scholar
Somody, C. N., Nalewaja, J. D., and Miller, S. D. 1984. The response of wild oat (Avena fatua) and Avena sterilis accessions to photoperiod and temperature. Weed Sci. 32:206–213.Google Scholar
Thill, D. C., O'Donovan, J. T., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1994. Integrated weed management strategies for delaying herbicide resistance in wild oats. Phytoprotection. 75(suppl.):61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, J. M. 1957. Morphological and physiological variation in wild oats (Avena fatua and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and in hybrids between wild and cultivated oats. J. Agric. Sci. 49:259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J. Y. 1960. A critique of the heat unit approach to plant response studies. Ecol. 41:785–790.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. J. 1979. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:716–739.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stage of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.Google Scholar
Zollinger, R. K., Ries, J. L., and Hammond, J. J. 2003. Survey of Weeds in North Dakota 2000. Fargo, ND North Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report ER-83, 97 p.Google Scholar