Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:26:58.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Tillage, Crop Rotation, and Weed Management on Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi) Population Dynamics and Corn Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marvin M. Schreiber
Marvin M. Schreiber*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric. and Prof., Weed Sci., Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A long-term integrated pest management study initiated in 1980 and continued through 1991 was conducted to determine interactions of tillage, crop rotation, and herbicide use levels on weed seed populations, weed populations, and crop yield. This paper presents giant foxtail seed population and stand along with corn yield in continuous corn, corn rotated with soybean, or corn following wheat in a soybean-wheat-corn rotation. Increasing herbicide use levels above the minimum reduced giant foxtail seed in the 0- to 2.5-cm depth of soil. Reducing tillage from conventional moldboard plowing to chiseling to no-tilling increased giant foxtail seed in only the top 0 to 2.5 cm of soil. No-tilling increased giant foxtail seed over conventional tillage in each year data were collected. Growing corn in a soybean-corn or soybean-wheat-corn rotation reduced giant foxtail seed from corn grown continuously in all three soil depths sampled: 0 to 2.5 cm, 2.5 to 10 cm, and 10 to 20 cm. Although stands of giant foxtail tended to follow soil weed seed counts, crop rotation significantly reduced giant foxtail stand with maximum reduction in the soybean-wheat-corn rotation in all tillage systems. Giant foxtail stands were reduced following wheat in no-tilling, probably because of the allelopathic influence of wheat straw. Corn yields showed weed management levels above minimum control are not justified regardless of tillage and crop rotation.

Keywords

Giant foxtail, Setaria faberiHerrm. #3 SETFAcorn, Zea mays L., ‘Callahan 766’soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Conventional moldboard plowchisel plowno-tillageweed densitycorn yieldallelopathyweed seedbankZea maysGlycine maxTriticum aestivumSETFA
Type
Special Topics
Information
Weed Science , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 645 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1990. Weed seed population response to tillage and herbicide use in three irrigated cropping systems. Weed Sci. 38:511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Mester, T. C. 1991. Effect of tillage systems on the emergence depth of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis). Weed Sci. 39:200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) density and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C., Moomaw, R. S., Roeth, F. W., Wicks, G. A., and Wilson, R. G. 1986. Weed seed demise in soil in weed-free corn (Zea mays) production across Nebraska. Weed Sci. 34:248–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K. 1991. Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio soils. Weed Sci. 39:186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Coote, D. R. and Ramsey, J. F. 1983. Quantification of the effects of over 35 years of intensive cultivation on four soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 63:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Cousens, R. and Moss, S. R. 1990. A model of the effects of cultivation on the vertical distribution of weed seeds within the soil. Weed Res. 30:61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Edwards, J. H., Thurlow, D. L., and Eason, J. T. 1988. Influence of tillage and crop rotation on yield of corn, soybean, and wheat. Agron. J. 80:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Egley, G. H. and Williams, R. D. 1990. Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbances. Weed Sci. 38:504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Forcella, F. and Lindstrom, M. J. 1988. Movement and germination of weed seeds in ridge-till crop production systems. Weed Sci. 36:56–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Griffith, D. R., Kladivko, E. J., Mannering, J. V., West, T. D., and Parsons, S. D. 1988. Long-term tillage and rotation effects on corn growth and yield on high and low organic matter in poorly drained soils. Agron. J. 80:599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kremer, R. J. and Spencer, N. R. 1989. Impact of a seed-eating insect and microorganisms on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed viability. Weed Sci. 37:211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Lund, R. D. and Turpin, F. T. 1977. Carabid damage to weed seeds found in Indiana corn fields. Environ. Entomol. 6:695–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Malone, C. R. 1967. A rapid method for enumeration of viable seeds in the soil. Weeds 15:381–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Martin, M. A., Schreiber, M. M., Riepe, J. R., and Bahr, J. R. 1991. The economics of alternate tillage systems, crop rotations, and herbicide use on three representative east-central corn belt farms. Weed Sci. 39:299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Pareja, M. R. and Staniforth, D. W. 1985. Seed-soil microsite characteristics in relation to weed seed germination. Weed Sci. 33:190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Petty, A., Staniforth, D. W., and Tiffany, L. H. 1987. Fungi associated with caryopses of Setaria species from field-harvested seeds and from soil under two tillage systems. Weed Sci. 35:319–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Schreiber, M. M. 1965. Effect of date of planting and stage of cutting on seed production of giant foxtail. Weeds 13:60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Schreiber, M. M., Abney, T. S., and Foster, J. E. 1987. Integrated pest management systems: a research approach. Agric. Exp. Res. Bull. 985. Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN. 31 pp.Google Scholar
20. Schweizer, E. E. and Zimdahl, R. L. 1984. Weed seed decline in irrigated soil after six years of continuous corn (Zea mays) and herbicides. Weed Sci. 32:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Schweizer, E. E., Lybecker, D. W., and Zimdahl, R. L. 1988. Systems approach to weed management in irrigated crops. Weed Sci. 36:840–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Staricka, J. A., Burford, P. M., Allmaras, R. R., and Nelson, W. W. 1990. Tracing the vertical distribution of simulated shattered seeds as related to tillage. Agron. J. 82:1131–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Steinsiek, J. W., Oliver, L. R., and Collins, F. C. 1982. Allelopathic potential of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw on selected weed species. Weed Sci. 30:495–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Stevens, O. A. 1932. The number and weight of seeds produced by weeds. Am. J. Bot. 19:784–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Terpstra, R. 1986. Behavior of weed seed in soil clods. Weed Sci. 34:889–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Wilson, R. G., Kerr, E. D., and Nelson, L. A. 1985. Potential for using weed seed content in the soil to predict future weed problems. Weed Sci. 33:171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wilson, H. P., Mascianica, M. P., Hines, T. E., and Walden, R. F. 1986. Influence of tillage and herbicides on weed control in a wheat (Triticum aestivum)-soybean (Glycine max) rotation. Weed Sci. 34:590–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Worsham, A. D. 1984. Crop residues kill weeds—allelopathy at work with wheat and rye. Crops Soils Mag. 37(2):18–20.Google Scholar