Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:33:27.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Soybean Oil Carrier and Method of Application on Weed Control in Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Van E. Banks
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Lawrence R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703
Marilyn McClelland
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703

Abstract

Acifluorfen {5-[2-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]-2-nitrobenzoic acid} and bentazon [3-(1-methylethyl-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] plus acifluorfen were applied through hydraulic flat-fan nozzles or controlled-droplet applicators (CDA) in water plus surfactant, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] oil and water emulsions, and soybean oil alone. Except for inadequate weed control with CDA applications at 7 L/ha, method of application did not affect weed control of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L. #3 XANST) or smooth pigweed (Amaranthus hybridus L. # AMACH) at high rates of bentazon plus acifluorfen (560 plus 280 g ai/ha or above). With low rates (280 plus 140 g/ha or less), hydraulic flat-fan nozzles were more effective than CDA applications. Early CDA applications of acifluorfen in an oil carrier at a volume of 9 L/ha were as effective as hydraulic nozzle applications at a carrier volume of 47 L/ha. Later applications resulted in inadequate weed control. Increasing soybean oil concentration from 2.5 to 40% (v/v) in acifluorfen spray mixtures did not significantly increase the phytotoxicity of acifluorfen.

Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ambach, R. M. and Ashford, R. 1982. Effects of variations in drop makeup on the phytotoxicity of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 30:221224.Google Scholar
2. Baldwin, F. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1985. A reduced rate, intensive management soybean weed control program. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:487.Google Scholar
3. Banks, V. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Soybean oil and postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:92.Google Scholar
4. Barrentine, W. L. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Oil carriers for herbicides on johnsongrass – a summary. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:533.Google Scholar
5. Bode, L. E., Butler, B. J., Pearson, S. L., and Bouse, L. F. 1983. Characteristics and operating parameters of CDA applicators. Trans. Am. Soc. Agric. Eng. 27:9991005.Google Scholar
6. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124130.Google Scholar
7. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574583.Google Scholar
8. Cantwell, J. R. and Kapusta, G. 1986. Application of bentazon and sethoxydim in soybean oil with rotary atomizers. Agron. J. 78:478482.Google Scholar
9. Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13–8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.Google Scholar
10. Ennis, W. B. and Williamson, R. E. 1963. Influence of droplet size on effectiveness of low-volume herbicidal sprays. Weeds 11:6772.Google Scholar
11. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development description for soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Crop Sci. 11:929931.Google Scholar
12. Frans, R. E., Talbert, R., Marx, D., and Crowley, H. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant response to weed control practices. Pages 2946 in Camper, N. D., ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. South. Weed Sci. Soc., Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
13. Hardman, D. 1986. New developments in turbo rotary atomization. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:535537.Google Scholar
14. Harrison, S. K. and Wax, L. M. 1986. Adjuvant effects on absorption, translocation, and metabolism of haloxyfop-methyl in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:185195.Google Scholar
15. Harrison, K. S., Wax, L. M., and Bode, L. E. 1986. Influence of adjuvants and application variables on postemergence weed control with bentazon and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 34:462466.Google Scholar
16. Hartzler, R. G. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Efficacy of three postemergence grass herbicides for soybeans. Weed Sci. 31:557561.Google Scholar
17. Helpert, C. W., Finley, C. M., and Viar, B. V. 1984. Vegetable oil concentrates as additives to bentazon and sethoxydim. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:91.Google Scholar
18. McGarvey, F. X. 1980. “C.D.A.” herbicide application. Weeds Today 11(2):89.Google Scholar
19. McKinlay, K. S., Ashford, R., and Ford, R. J. 1974. Effects of drop size, spray volume, and dosage on paraquat toxicity. Weed Sci. 22:3134.Google Scholar
20. McKinlay, K. S., Brandt, S. A., Morse, P., and Ashford, R. 1972. Droplet size and phytotoxicity of herbicides. Weed Sci. 20:450452.Google Scholar
21. Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1975. Influence of climate and additives on bentazon. Weed Sci. 23:504507.Google Scholar
22. Nalewaja, J. D. and Skzypczak, G. A. 1986. Absorption and translocation of fluazifop with additives. Weed Sci. 34:572576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Parker, W. B., Thompson, L., and Godley, M. F. 1985. Integrating sethoxydim into soybean (Glycine max) weed management systems. Weed Sci. 33:100108.Google Scholar