Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:57:51.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Soybean (Glycine max) Planting Date on Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

L. R. Oliver
L. R. Oliver*
Affiliation:
Altheimer Lab., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A 2-yr study was conducted to determine the influence of early and late soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] planting dates on the competitiveness of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic). Velvetleaf was planted at densities of one plant per 61 and 30 cm of row, and competition ranged from 4 weeks to full season. Soybean planting dates were mid-May and late-June. Velvetleaf emerging with soybeans in mid-May were twice as competitive as those emerging with soybeans planted in late-June. A density of one velvetleaf per 30 cm of row competing full season reduced soybean yields 27% for the early and only 14% for the late planting date. The competitive difference was due to the short-day photoperiodic response of velvetleaf. Although the early growth stages of soybeans are more competitive than those of velvetleaf, 10 weeks after emergence velvetleaf competition reduced soybean growth and development. Velvetleaf does not appear to be a potential major problem in Arkansas for soybeans planted in June due to its photoperiodic response and late season competitiveness. However, the weed could present problems for soybeans planted early, especially when an early maturing variety is used.

Keywords

Leaf area indexphotoperiodcrop growth rate
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1979 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. and Oliver, L. R. 1977. Competition, threshold levels, and control of cocklebur in soybeans. Mississippi Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 83. 27 pp.Google Scholar
2. Chandler, J. M. and Dale, J. E. 1974. Comparative growth of four Malvaceous species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:116–117.Google Scholar
3. Chandler, J. M. 1977. Competition of spurred anoda, velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in cotton. Weed Sci. 25:151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eaton, B. J. 1973. Venice mallow competition in soybeans. Weed Sci. 21:89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Eaton, B. J., Russ, O. G., and Feltner, K. C. 1976. Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci. 24:224–228.Google Scholar
6. Lambert, W. M. and Oliver, L. R. 1975. Competitive potential of spurred anoda in soybeans and in cotton. Arkansas Farm Res. 24:5.Google Scholar
7. Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., and Talbert, R. E. 1976. Field competition between tall morningglory and soybean. I. Growth analysis. Weed Sci. 24:482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species on soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.Google Scholar