Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:05:23.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Sowing Time on Winter Wild Oat (Avena ludoviciana) Control in Wheat (Triticum aestivum) with Isoproturon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Samunder Singh ,
R. K. Malik ,
R. S. Panwar  and
R. S. Balyan
Samunder Singh
Affiliation:
Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar, India, 125 004
R. K. Malik
Affiliation:
Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar, India, 125 004
R. S. Panwar
Affiliation:
Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar, India, 125 004
R. S. Balyan
Affiliation:
Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar, India, 125 004
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during the winters of 1987–88 and 1988–89 at Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India to evaluate the response of winter wild oat to sowing date and isoproturon application time in wheat. In another experiment, the effect of sowing time on emergence and growth of winter wild oat and wheat sown separately was studied. The treatments that provided more than 75% control of winter wild oat were: isoproturon at 0.75 kg ha−1 applied at the 2-leaf stage of winter wild oat; isoproturon 1 kg ha−1 applied at the 4-leaf stage of winter wild oat in the November 30 planting; and isoproturon 0.50 kg ha−1 applied at the 1- to 2-leaf stage of winter wild oat in the December 20 sowing. Isoproturon did not provide more than 50% control of winter wild oat in the November 10 sowing. Mortality of winter wild oat increased from 38 to 72 to 87% in November 10, November 30, and December 20 sowings, respectively. Mortality of winter wild oat was similar in November 30 and December 20 sowings but higher grain yield was recorded in November 30 sowing. Due to vigorous growth of winter wild oat in the November 10 sowing, isoproturon did not provide good control. December 20 sowing favored wheat growth due to lower density and late emergence of winter wild oat but reduction in wheat grain yield was greater. When averaged over isoproturon treatments, the grain yield of wheat was 4607, 5297, and 4457 kg ha−1 in the November 10, November 30, and December 20 sowings, respectively.

Keywords

Isoproturon, N′-(4-isopropylphenyl)-N,N-dimethyl ureawinter wild oat, Avena ludoviciana Durieu #3 AVELUwheat, Triticum aestivum (L.) ‘WH-283.’Physiological stageweed competitionAVELU
Type
Weed biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , September 1995 , pp. 370 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Balyan, R. S., Malik, R. K., Panwar, R. S., and Bhan, V. M. 1987. Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in wheat. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 17:170–173.Google Scholar
2. Balyan, R. S. and Malik, R. K. 1988. Effect of time of application of isoproturon + 2,4-D on the control of weeds in wheat. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 18:47–49.Google Scholar
3. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
4. Bhan, V. M. and Bhaskar Chaudhary, D. B. 1976. Germination, growth, and reproductive behaviour of Phalaris minor Retz. as affected by date of planting. Indian J. Weed Sci. 8:126–130.Google Scholar
5. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.Google Scholar
6. Gillespie, R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1988. Economic control of weeds in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 2:257–262.Google Scholar
7. Gonzalezponce, R. and Rodrigue Senas, J. 1983. Experiments with isoproturon on the control of weeds in winter cereal crops. Weed Res. 23:19–43.Google Scholar
8. Gupta, V. K., Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Bhan, V. M. 1990. Effect of growth stages of wild oat on the efficacy of urea herbicides applied post emergence. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 20:57–65.Google Scholar
9. Hawton, D. and Drennen, D.S.H. 1980. Studies on competition between Setaria anceps and Eleusine indica . Weed Res. 20:211–215.Google Scholar
10. Ibrahim, A. F., Kandil, A. A., Fl. Halter, A. H., and Eissa, A. K. 1986. Effect of sowing date and weed control on grain yield and its components in some wheat cultivars. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 157:199–207.Google Scholar
11. Lutman, P.J.W. 1989. Objectives of weed control in oilseed rape. Aspects of Applied Biology 23. Page 199–210 in Production and Protection of Oilseed Rape and Other Brassica Crops. Assoc. Appl. Biologists, Warwick.Google Scholar
12. Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Bhan, V. M. 1984. Integrated control of Phalaris minor in wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci. 16:52–55.Google Scholar
13. Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Bhan, V. M. 1988. Effect of surfactants on the efficacy of some post emergence grass herbicides. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 18:276–283.Google Scholar
14. Malik, R. K., Malik, R. S., Bhan, V. M., and Panwar, R. S. 1989. Influence of time of application of urea herbicides and diclofop-methyl in wheat. Indian J. Agron. 34:312–315.Google Scholar
15. Malik, R. K., Panwar, R. S., and Katyal, S. K. 1990. Effect of method of application of isoproturon on weed control in wheat. Haryana J. Agron. 6:110–112.Google Scholar
16. Martin, M.P.L.D. and Field, R. J. 1987. Competition between vegetative plants of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Weed Res. 27:119–124.Google Scholar
17. Martin, M.P.L.D. and Field, R. J. 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28:111–116.Google Scholar
18. Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1988. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and development in monoculture and mixed culture. Weed Sci. 36:43–48.Google Scholar
19. O'Donovan, J.T.D. 1988. Wild oat (Avena fatua) infestations and economic returns as influenced by frequency of weed control. Weed Technol. 2:495–498.Google Scholar
20. Pandey, J. and Singh, S. J. 1984. Effect of herbicides on Phalaris minor, Avena fatua and yield of wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci. 16:190–193.Google Scholar
21. Panse, V. G. and Sukhatame, P. V. 1967. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Pages 592–593 in Panse, V. G., ed. ICAR, New Delhi.Google Scholar
22. Panwar, R. S., Malik, R. K., and Malik, R. S. 1990. Effect of herbicides and sowing time on wild oat control in wheat. Haryana Agric. Univ. J. Res. 20:268–272.Google Scholar
23. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crops in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agric. 16:151–160.Google Scholar
24. Regnier, E. E. and Soller, E. W. 1989. The effect of soybean (Glycine max) interference on the canopy architecture of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), jimsonweed (Datura stramonium), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 37:187–195.Google Scholar
25. Ross, M. A. and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupational and biological space during seeding establishment. J. Ecol. 60:77–88.Google Scholar
26. Sharma, M. P., McBeath, D. K., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1977. Studies on the biology of wild oats. II. Growth. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:811–817.Google Scholar
27. Singh, M., Ahuja, R. L., and Khanna, S. S. 1985. Soils of Haryana and their management. Pages 130–148 in Biswas, B. C., Yadav, D. S., and Maheswari, S., ed. Soils of India and Their Management. FAI, New Delhi.Google Scholar
28. Singh, R. K. and Ghosh, A. K. 1992. Effect of temperature and sowing date on germination and infestation of wild oats. Indian J. Weed Sci. 24:42–48.Google Scholar
29. Singh, S., Malik, R. K., Balyan, R. S., and Singh, S. 1992. Weed survey of wheat in Haryana. Weed Sci. Soc. India, Annu. Meeting, Haryana Agric. Univ., Hisar. Abstract 1.11.Google Scholar
30. Singh, S. B. and Dixit, R. S. 1985. Effect of sowing date on wheat varieties. Indian J. Agron. 32:512–513.Google Scholar
31. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:716–739.Google Scholar
32. Wilson, B. J. and Wright, K. J. 1990. Predicting the growth and competition effects of annual weeds in wheat. Weed Res. 30:201–211.Google Scholar
33. Yaduraju, N. T. and Mani, V. S. 1987. The influence of delayed planting and seedbed preparation on the competition of wild oat in wheat. Indian J. Agron. 32:299–301.Google Scholar