Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-28T01:57:10.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Simazine on Apparent Photosynthesis of Aquatic Plants and Herbicide Residue Removal from Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Sutton ,
D. A. Durham ,
S. W. Bingham  and
C. L. Foy
David L. Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg
D. A. Durham
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia
S. W. Bingham
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg
C. L. Foy
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Physiology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simazine (2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine) at 0.12 to 1.0 ppmw in nutrient cultures of common duckweed (Lemna minor L.), elodea (Elodea canadensis Michx.), and parrotfeather (Myriophyllum brasiliense Camb.) inhibited oxygen evolution within 24 hr. Of the plants studied, the submersed form of parrotfeather exhibited the greatest reduction in apparent photosynthesis as measured by dissolved oxygen in the water. Simazine in nutrient culture without plants remained relatively stable during the treatment period; a slight, but not significant, diminution of chemical was detected after 4 days. Each species, elodea or emersed parrotfeather, reduced the concentration of simazine in solution within 48 hr after treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1969 , pp. 56 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartley, C. E. 1957. Simazine and related triazines as herbicides. Agr. Chem. 12:34–36, 113–115.Google Scholar
2. Burchfield, H. P. and Storrs, E. E. 1956. A colorimetric method for determination of 2,4-dichloro-6-(o-chloro-analine)-s-triazine and related compounds. Boyce Thompson Inst. Contrib. 18:319–330.Google Scholar
3. Davis, D. E., Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Sansing, N. G. 1959. The absorption and translocation of C14-labeled simazine by corn, cotton, and cucumber. Weeds 7:300–309.Google Scholar
4. Flanagan, J. H. 1960. A review of simazine for aquatic weed control. Proc. NEWCC 14:502–505.Google Scholar
5. Good, N. E. 1961. Inhibitors of the Hill reaction. Plant Physiol. 36:788–803.Google Scholar
6. Knüsli, E., Burchfield, H. P., and Storrs, E. E. 1964. Simazine, p. 213–233. In Zweig, G. (ed.). Analytical Methods for Pesticides, Plant Growth Regulators, and Food Additives. Vol. IV. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Moreland, D. E., Gentner, W. A., Hilton, J. L., and Hill, K. L. 1959. Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine. Plant Physiol. 34:432–435.Google Scholar
8. Roth, W. 1958. Substances régulartrices de la croissance vegetale. Experientia 14:137–138.Google Scholar
9. Sheets, T. J. 1961. Uptake and distribution of simazine by oat and cotton seedlings. Weeds 9:1–13.Google Scholar
10. Snow, J. R. 1963. Simazine as an algicide for bass ponds. Progressive Fish-Cult. 25:34–36.Google Scholar
11. Sutton, D. L., Evrard, T. O., and Chappell, W. E. 1965. Effects of simazine on aquatic plants in a farm pond. Proc. NEWCC 19:440–444.Google Scholar
12. Walker, C. R. 1964. Simazine and other s-triazine compounds as aquatic herbicides in fish habitats. Weeds 12:134–139.Google Scholar